3.Comparison of wound healing after pancreaticojejunostomy with three anastomotic methods in piglets.
Ying-bin LIU ; Jin-hui ZHU ; Jian-wei WANG ; He-qing FANG ; Jiang-tao LI ; Fu-bao LIU ; Jian-feng XUE ; Xu-an WANG ; Wei-long CAI ; Jun WANG ; Shu-you PENG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2006;44(5):339-343
OBJECTIVETo evaluate wound healing after pancreaticojejunostomy of three anastomotic methods.
METHODSFifty-four domestic piglets were divided into three groups according to the types of anastomoses: group of end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination (EE group), group of binding pancreaticojejunostomy (BP group) and group of inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy (IP group). Bursting pressure, breaking strength and histopathological findings of anastomosis were assessed on operative day and on the 5th and 10th day after operation.
RESULTSBursting pressure was (67+/-8) mm Hg, (96+/-11) mm Hg and (131+/-9) mm Hg in EE group on day 0, 5 and 10; and (140+/-8) mm Hg, (179+/-10) mm Hg and (269+/-13) mm Hg in BP group; and (102+/-10) mm Hg, (171+/-18) mm Hg and (254+/-24) mm Hg in IP group. Compare to EE group, bursting pressure of BP group and IP group were all increased with significant differences (P<0.05). Another significant difference was observed between BP group and IP group after anastomoses on operative day. Breaking strength was (4.6+/-0.6) N, (5.8+/-0.5) N and (7.1+/-0.6) N in EE group on 0 d, 5 d and 10 d; and (4.5+/-0.4) N, (6.6+/-0.4) N and (10.0+/-0.6) N in BP group; and (4.6+/-0.3) N, (6.5+/-0.4) N and (9.1+/-0.9) N in IP group. A similar value of anastomoses was shown in BP group and IP group on day 0, day 5 and day 10, but significant increase was demonstrated compared to EE group on day 5 and 10. Anastomotic site was well repaired by connective tissue and the cut surface of pancreatic stump was covered by mucosal epithelium in BP group and IP group on day 10, but the cut surface was incompletely repaired by granulation tissue and no regeneration of the epithelium was found in EE group.
CONCLUSIONSWound healing of binding pancreaticojejunostomy and inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy is more rapid and better than end-to-end pancreaticojejunal invagination, but breaking strength of inkwell pancreaticojejunostomy is weaker than binding pancreaticojejunostomy.
Anastomosis, Surgical ; methods ; Animals ; Female ; Male ; Pancreaticojejunostomy ; adverse effects ; methods ; Surgical Stomas ; pathology ; Swine ; Wound Healing
4.Analysis of influencing factors on surgical outcome and exploration of technical principles during pancreaticojejunostomy.
Jian Qi WANG ; Mei Li FAN ; Hong Chi JIANG
Chinese Journal of Surgery 2022;60(3):219-222
Pancreaticojejunostomy is the most common anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy and middle pancreatectomy. The detailed surgical technics of pancreaticojejunostomy vary dramatically, but none of them can achieve zero fistula rate. In recent years,with the development of new surgical concept,application of new surgical technology, high-tech materials and instruments,the incidence of pancreatic fistula has decreased. At the same time,researches on investigating the risk factors of pancreaticojejunostomy are gradually deepening. Based on years of surgical experience on pancreaticojejunostomy and current literatures, this paper analyzes the factors affecting the effect of pancreaticojejunostomy, such as the patient's basic physical state,pancreatic texture and diameter of the pancreatic duct,pathology and course of the disease,surgical technology and perioperative management,and summarizes six technical principles for pancreaticojejunostomy to be shared with surgical comrades:appropriate tension,protection of blood supply,hermetic closure of pancreatic section,accurate connection of pancreatic duct and intestinal mucosa,individualization,learning and accumulation of experience.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Humans
;
Pancreatic Fistula/prevention & control*
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects*
;
Pancreaticojejunostomy/adverse effects*
;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
;
Treatment Outcome
5.Predictive models and prophylactic strategies for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(11):987-991
Anastomotic leakage (AL) has always been a persistent issue for colorectal surgeons. It is still difficult to reduce the incidence of AL despite the advances in technology and equipment. With the development of evidence-based medicine, increasing high-risk factors for AL have been identified. How to efficiently and systematically combine and quantify these isolated risk factors to provide a scientific early warning of AL in clinical practices and help surgeons in choosing the optimal prophylactic strategies, is of great significance for reducing the incidence of AL. There are generally two types of AL prediction models in colorectal surgery, including prognostic models (for preoperative and intraoperative AL prediction) and diagnostic models (for early warning and improving the early diagnosis rate of AL). Prophylactic strategies for AL include stabilizing the underlying diseases, improving anemia and hypoalbuminemia, choosing an appropriate operative time window, and emphasizing and improving anastomotic techniques (including choosing an appropriate size of stapler). However, a prophylactic ostomy is still the most common method for surgeons. However, how to reduce the morbidity of complications following prophylactic ostomy and how to avoid the conversion of the prophylactic stoma to permanent stoma need further study.
Humans
;
Anastomotic Leak/etiology*
;
Colorectal Surgery/adverse effects*
;
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/methods*
;
Risk Factors
6.Chinese expert consensus on protective ostomy for mid-low rectal cancer (version 2022).
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(6):471-478
The rate of sphincter-preserving surgery for mid-low rectal cancer is increasing, but anastomotic leakage remains to be one of the common serious complications after operation. How to reduce the morbility and mortality of anastomotic leakage is always a hot and difficult point in colorectal surgery. Protective ostomy is a common method to deal with the above problems in clinical practice. However, some problems such as inappropriate stoma and stoma-related complications etc. become the current clinical challenges. The purpose of this consensus focusing on indication of ostomy, clinical value, ostomy skills, prevention of stoma complications, reversion of stoma and stoma nursing aims to provide guidance for the clinical practice of protective ostomy in the operation of mid-low rectal cancer in China.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Anastomotic Leak/etiology*
;
Consensus
;
Humans
;
Ostomy/adverse effects*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Risk Factors
;
Surgical Stomas
7.Techniques in prophylactic ileostomy reversal.
Ming CAI ; Chao LI ; Zhen XIONG ; Zheng WANG ; Kai Lin CAI ; Guo Bin WANG ; Kai Xiong TAO
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(11):976-980
In order to prevent and reduce the severity of anastomotic leakage after low rectal cancer surgery, prophylactic ileostomy is often performed by the clinician simultaneously. There are many controversies about prophylactic ileostomy in medicine, such as ileostomy indications, ileostomy complications, ileostomy reversal time, ileostomy reversal method and technique. Based on relevant literature and our own experience, we discussed the timing, method and complications of ileostomy reversal in this article to improve the diagnosis and treatment of ileostomy reversal as well as the life quality of the patients after ileostomy reversal.
Humans
;
Ileostomy/methods*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Anastomotic Leak/etiology*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/complications*
;
Rectum/surgery*
8.Influencing factors of anastomotic leak after right hemicolon surgery and progress in diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Hao Yu ZHANG ; Zhen Jun WANG ; Jia Gang HAN
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2021;24(6):544-549
Anastomotic leak is one of the most severe complications following right hemicolectomy but rarely happens, which should be diagnosed based on clinical manifestations, laboratory and radiographic examinations. Influencing factors of anastomotic leak after right hemicolectomy include bowel preparation, emergency surgery, anastomotic procedure (side-to-side anastomosis vs. end-to-side anastomosis, instrument anastomosis vs. manual technigue and intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal anastomosis), surgical resection range and patient's characteristics. The occurrence of anastomotic leak might be avoided by standardized operations and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. Active treatment is recommended once anastomotic leak is diagnosed. Most patients can be cured by non-surgical treatments such as adequate drainage and anti-infection therapy. When severe sepsis happens or non-surgical treatment fails, surgical treatment should be carried out in time.
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Anastomotic Leak/surgery*
;
Colectomy
;
Colon/surgery*
;
Humans
;
Indocyanine Green
9.Clinical curative effect observation of double tube method in the treatment of esophagojejunostomy leakage after laparoscopic for total gastrectomy.
Xiang GENG ; Hai Liang LI ; Chen Yang GUO ; Hong Tao HU ; Hong Tao CHENG ; Quan Jun YAO ; Chuang SHANG ; Ke ZHAO
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(7):627-631
10.Current status of influencing factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in low rectal cancer.
Ya Ting LIU ; Yu HUANG ; Yao Guang HAO ; Peng Fei ZHANG ; Xu YIN ; Jian Feng ZHANG ; Xu Hua HU ; Bao Kun LI ; Gui Ying WANG
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2022;25(11):1039-1044
The incidence of anastomotic leakage, a common and serious postoperative complication of low rectal cancer, remains high. Clarifying the risk factors for anastomotic leakage in patients with low rectal cancer after surgery can help guide clinical treatment and help patients improve their prognosis. The current literature suggests that the risk factors affecting the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after low rectal cancer include three aspects: (1) individual factors: male gender, high body mass index, malnutrition, smoking, alcoholism, and metabolic diseases; (2) tumor factors: the lower margin of tumor <5 cm from the anal verge, tumor diameter >2.5 cm, late tumor stage, high level of tumor markers and preoperative intestinal obstruction; (3) surgical factors: long operative time (>180 min), intraoperative bleeding (≥70 ml), more than 2 cartridges of stapling for anastomosis, contamination of the operative field, epidural analgesia and intraoperative hypothermia. Notably, the surgical approach (laparoscopic, open and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery) was not a factor influencing the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage in low rectal cancer. The findings on the effects of receiving neoadjuvant therapy, gut microbiota,intestinal bowel preparation, insufficient time for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, left colonic artery dissection, intraoperative blood transfusion, pelvic drainage, transanal drainage and combined organ resection, and postoperative diarrhea on postoperative anastomotic leakage in low rectal cancer are controversial. However, clinical workers can still take measures to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage according to the above risk factors by making a good assessment before surgery, actively avoiding them during and after surgery, and taking measures for each step, so as to bring maximum benefits to patients.
Humans
;
Male
;
Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control*
;
Rectum/surgery*
;
Rectal Neoplasms/complications*
;
Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects*
;
Laparoscopy/adverse effects*