1.Acupoint Injection Decreases Anesthetic Cosumption during Combined Spinal-Epidural and Patient-Controlled Epidural Labor Analgesia.
Min-Li HUANG ; Chang-Ping FANG ; Hai-Yan ZHAO ; Zi-Jing ZHANG ; Shu-Zhen WU ; Wei YI ; Shang-Rong LI ; Ling-Ling WU
Chinese journal of integrative medicine 2022;28(3):257-262
OBJECTIVE:
To explore if acupoint injection can improve analgesic effects or delivery outcomes in parturients who received combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor analgesia.
METHODS:
A total of 307 participants were prospectively collected from July 2017 to December 2019. The participants were randomized into the combined acupoint injection with CSEA plus PCEA group (AICP group, n=168) and CSEA plus PCEA group (CP group, n=139) for labor analgesia using a random number table. Both groups received CSEA plus PCEA at cervical dilation 3 cm during labor process, and parturients of the AICP group were implemented acupoint injection for which bilateral acupoint of Zusanli (ST 36) and Sanyinjiao (SP 6) were selected in addition. The primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and the secondary outcomes were obstetric outcomes and requirement of anesthetics doses. Safety evaluations were performed after intervention.
RESULTS:
The VAS scores were significantly lower in the AICP group than in the CP group at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after labor analgesia (all P<0.05). The latent phase of the AICP group was shorter than that of the CP group (P<0.05). There were less additional anesthetics consumption, lower incidences of uterine atony, fever, pruritus and urinary retention in the AICP group than those in the CP group (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSION
Acupoint injection combined CSEA plus PCEA for labor analgesia can decrease the anesthetic consumption, improve analgesic quality, and reduce adverse reactions in the parturients. (Registration No. ChiMCTR-2000003120).
Acupuncture Points
;
Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects*
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/adverse effects*
;
Anesthetics/pharmacology*
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Labor, Obstetric
;
Pregnancy
2.Acute Dystonia by Droperidol during Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Young Patients.
Chang Kil PARK ; Hwan Yeong CHOI ; In Young OH ; Myung Suk KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2002;17(5):715-717
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is an important means for postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioid. However, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains a major problem with a PCA system. Droperidol is used in PCA to prevent PONV. Extrapyramidal reactions by droperidol are, however, occasionally induced. We describe two cases of severe extrapyramidal hypertonic syndrome with an intravenous administration of droperidol in PCA in young patients, following orthopedic surgery.
Acute Disease
;
Adolescent
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/*adverse effects
;
Analgesics/administration & dosage/*adverse effects
;
Droperidol/administration & dosage/*adverse effects
;
Dystonia/*chemically induced
;
Humans
;
Infusions, Intravenous
;
Male
3.Comparison of oxycodone and sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for postoperative patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Xixia FENG ; Pingliang YANG ; Zaibo LIAO ; Ruihao ZHOU ; Lu CHEN ; Ling YE
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(1):45-52
BACKGROUND:
Managing acute postoperative pain is challenging for anesthesiologists, surgeons, and patients, leading to adverse events despite making significant progress. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is a recommended solution, where oxycodone has depicted unique advantages in recent years. However, controversy still exists in clinical practice and this study aimed to compare two drugs in PCIA.
METHODS:
We performed a literature search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases up to December 2020 to select specific randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of oxycodone with sufentanil in PCIA. The analgesic effect was the primary outcome and the secondary outcome included PCIA consumption, the Ramsay sedation scale, patients' satisfaction and side effects.
RESULTS:
Fifteen RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with sufentanil, oxycodone showed lower Numerical Rating Scale scores (mean difference [MD] = -0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.01 to -0.41; P < 0.001; I2 = 93%), demonstrated better relief from visceral pain (MD = -1.22, 95% CI: -1.58 to -0.85; P < 0.001; I2 = 90%), promoted a deeper sedative level as confirmed by the Ramsay Score (MD = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.35-1.19; P < 0.001; I2 = 97%), and resulted in fewer side effects (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.35-0.60; P < 0.001; I2 = 11%). There was no statistical difference in the degree of patients' satisfaction (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.88-1.44; P = 0.33; I2 = 72%) and drug consumption (MD = -5.55, 95% CI: -14.18 to 3.08; P = 0.21; I2 = 93%).
CONCLUSION:
Oxycodone improves postoperative analgesia and causes fewer adverse effects, and could be recommended for PCIA, especially after abdominal surgeries.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; CRD42021229973.
Humans
;
Oxycodone/therapeutic use*
;
Sufentanil/therapeutic use*
;
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
;
Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy*
;
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
4.Finding the 'Ideal' Regimen for Fentanyl-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: How to Give and What to Mix?.
Seokyung SHIN ; Keoung Tae MIN ; Yang Sik SHIN ; Hyung Min JOO ; Young Chul YOO
Yonsei Medical Journal 2014;55(3):800-806
PURPOSE: This analysis was done to investigate the optimal regimen for fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) by finding a safe and effective background infusion rate and assessing the effect of adding adjuvant drugs to the PCA regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Background infusion rate of fentanyl, type of adjuvant analgesic and/or antiemetic that was added to the IV-PCA, and patients that required rescue analgesics and/or antiemetics were retrospectively reviewed in 1827 patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominal surgery at a single tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Upon multivariate analysis, lower background infusion rates, younger age, and IV-PCA without adjuvant analgesics were identified as independent risk factors of rescue analgesic administration. Higher background infusion rates, female gender, and IV-PCA without additional 5HT3 receptor blockers were identified as risk factors of rescue antiemetics administration. A background infusion rate of 0.38 microg/kg/hr [area under the curve (AUC) 0.638] or lower required rescue analgesics in general, whereas, addition of adjuvant analgesics decreased the rate to 0.37 microg/kg/hr (AUC 0.712) or lower. A background infusion rate of 0.36 microg/kg/hr (AUC 0.638) or higher was found to require rescue antiemetics in general, whereas, mixing antiemetics with IV-PCA increased the rate to 0.37 microg/kg/hr (AUC 0.651) or higher. CONCLUSION: Background infusion rates of fentanyl between 0.12 and 0.67 microg/kg/hr may safely be used without any serious side effects for IV-PCA. In order to approach the most reasonable background infusion rate for effective analgesia without increasing postoperative nausea and vomiting, adding an adjuvant analgesic and an antiemetic should always be considered.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/*adverse effects/*methods
;
Female
;
Fentanyl/administration & dosage/therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sex Factors
5.A case-control study on the risk factors in postoperative cognitive dysfunction induced by patient self-controlled intravenous analgesia.
Wen-Fei TAN ; Yun-Hui ZHAO ; Bo FANG ; Hong MA ; Jun-Ke WANG
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2008;29(2):188-190
OBJECTIVETo investigate the risk factors in postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) induced by patient self-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA).
METHODSA case-control study included 103 patients with POCD(P group), assessed by Mini-Mental-State test and 103 cognitive normal controls (NP group). The cases and controls were matched for age, gender,history of operation and PCIA volume dose. The relationship between POCD and various factors was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Spss 11.5 of statistical software was used for data analysis.
RESULTSData from univariate analysis showed that the history of cerebral trauma, education level and VAS score had significant differences between P group and NP group. Multivariate analysis conformed that the history of cerebral trauma, VAS score and education level were significantly related to POCD induced by PCIA and their ORs (95% CI) were 4.261 (1.344-13.508), 2.364 (1.209-4.624), 0.312 (0.170-0.573) respectively.
CONCLUSIONPatient's history of cerebral trauma and low VAS score were independent risk factors of POCD induced by PCIA and high education level seemed to be a protective factor.
Aged ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; adverse effects ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognition Disorders ; etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications ; etiology ; Risk Factors
6.Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular Shenmen (TF4) in cesarean section.
Jing-Zhu LI ; Li-Li ZHENG ; Ming-Shan WANG
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine 2012;32(7):885-888
OBJECTIVETo study the efficacy and safety of patient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular Shenmen (TF4) in cesarean section.
METHODSA randomized controlled clinical trail was conducted on 180 singleton primiparas (SAS > 30) undergoing selective cesarean section. They were randomly assigned to three groups, i. e., the patient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular Shenmen (TF4) group (Group A, 60 cases), the patient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular eye point group (Group B, 60 cases), and the control group (Group C, 60 cases). Patients in Group A received patient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular Shenmen (TF4) in the operating room. The strength was controlled by patients themselves. The stimulation lasted for 30 min before the epidural puncture till ending the surgery. Patients in Group B received stimulation of auricular eye point. Patients in Group C received pressurization with the same connected line as Group A, but without electric stimulation. The following indices were observed: (1) the bispectral index (BIS), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), Ramsay sedation score when the women entered the operating room (T0), 30 min after stimulation (T1), at the time after removing the fetus (T2), and by the end of surgery (T3); (2) the concentrations of plasma angiotensin II (AngII) and cortisone (Cor) at the aforesaid time points; (3) the use rates of oxytocin, atropine, and ephedrine; the hemorrhage amount, and the neonatal Apgar score.
RESULTSCompared with Group A, the BIS, the plasma concentrations of AngII and Cor increased at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05), and the Ramsay sedation score decreased (P < 0.05). The HR and MAP increased at T1 (P < 0.05) in Group B and Group C. Compared with T0, the BIS, HR, MAP, and Ramsay sedation score, the plasma concentrations of AnglI and Cor were lowered in Group A at T1 (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the use rates of oxytocin, atropine, and ephedrine; the hemorrhage amount, and the neonatal Apgar score (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONSPatient-controlled sedation with transcutaneous electrical stimulation of auricular Shenmen (TF4) in cesarean section had obvious sedative effects. It had no adverse effects on puerperal or neonates.
Acupuncture Points ; Adult ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; methods ; Cesarean Section ; methods ; Female ; Humans ; Pain Measurement ; Pregnancy ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ; adverse effects ; methods
7.Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil and fentanyl after thoracotomy: a comparative study.
Chun-shui LIN ; Gang LU ; Luo-yang RUAN ; Miao-ning GU
Journal of Southern Medical University 2006;26(2):240-244
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the clinical efficacy of sufentanil and fentanyl at equivalent dose for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after thoracotomy.
METHODSSixty ASA I-II patients (20-60 years of age) undergoing radical operation for lung or esophageal cancer were randomly divided into sufentanil intravenous analgesia group (group S, with sufentanil 1 microg/ml) and fentanyl intravenous analgesia group (group F, fentanyl 10 microg/ml). PCIA was administered with background infusion of 2.5 ml/h, bolus injection of 2.5 ml and lockout time of 15 min. The pain intensity according to visual analogue scale (VAS), cumulative analgesic consumption (CAC), sedative scores and side effects at 24 and 48 h after administration were recorded. SpO(2), respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP) and ECG were continuously monitored.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences in CAC between the two groups, but he VAS was lower in group S than in group F (P<0.05) and the sedative efficacy was superior in group S (P<0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting in group S was lower than that in group F (P<0.05). No significant differences were observed in SpO(2), RR, heart rate and mean arterial pressure between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONPCIA with sufentanil provides better efficacy of analgesia and sedation with lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than with fentanyl in postoperative patients with thoracotomy.
Adult ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Female ; Fentanyl ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Lung Neoplasms ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; chemically induced ; Pain, Postoperative ; drug therapy ; Sufentanil ; administration & dosage ; adverse effects ; Thoracotomy ; Vomiting ; chemically induced
8.Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on nausea and vomiting induced by patient controlled intravenous analgesia with tramadol.
Li-hong ZHENG ; Hong SUN ; Guo-nian WANG ; Jie LIANG ; Hua-xing WU
Chinese journal of integrative medicine 2008;14(1):61-64
OBJECTIVETo observe the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on nausea and vomiting (N&V) induced by patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with Tramadol.
METHODSSixty patients who were ready to receive scheduled operation for tumor in the head-neck region and post-operation PCIA, aged 39-65 years, with the physique grades I-II of ASA, were randomized into two groups, A and B, 30 in each group. The pre-operation medication, induction of analgesia and continuous anesthesia used in the two groups were the same. TEAS on bilateral Hegu (LI4) and Neiguan (PC6) points was intermittently applied to the patients in group A starting from 30 min before analgesia induction to 24 h after operation, and the incidence and score of nausea and vomiting, antiemetic used, visual analogue scores (VAS), and PCIA pressing times in 4 time segments (0-4, 4-8, 8-12 and 12-24 h after the operation was finished) were determined. The same management was applied to patients in Group B, with sham TEAS for control.
RESULTSThe incidence and degree of N&V, as well as the number of patients who needed remedial antiemetic in Group A were less than those in Group B. The VAS score and PCIA pressing time were lower in Group A than those in Group B in the corresponding time segments respectively.
CONCLUSIONTEAS could prevent N&V induced by PCIA with Tramadol.
Acupuncture Points ; Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled ; Analgesics, Opioid ; adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nausea ; prevention & control ; Tramadol ; adverse effects ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ; Vomiting ; prevention & control
9.Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Fentanyl-Based Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Single Antiemetic Prophylaxis.
Jong Bum CHOI ; Yon Hee SHIM ; Youn Woo LEE ; Jeong Soo LEE ; Jong Rim CHOI ; Chul Ho CHANG
Yonsei Medical Journal 2014;55(5):1430-1435
PURPOSE: We evaluated the incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and single antiemetic prophylaxis of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5 HT3)-receptor antagonist after the general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, incidence and risk factors for PONV were evaluated with fentanyl IV-PCA during postoperative 48 hours after various surgeries. RESULTS: Four hundred-forty patients (23%) of 1878 had showed PONV. PCA was discontinued temporarily in 268 patients (14%), mostly due to PONV (88% of 268 patients). In multivariate analysis, female, non-smoker, history of motion sickness or PONV, long duration of anesthesia (>180 min), use of desflurane and intraoperative remifentanil infusion were independent risk factors for PONV. If one, two, three, four, five, or six of these risk factors were present, the incidences of PONV were 18%, 19%, 22%, 31%, 42%, or 50%. Laparoscopic surgery and higher dose of fentanyl were not risk factors for PONV. CONCLUSION: Despite antiemetic prophylaxis with 5 HT3-receptor antagonist, 23% of patients with fentanyl-based IV-PCA after general anesthesia showed PONV. Long duration of anesthesia and use of desflurane were identified as risk factors, in addition to risk factors of Apfel's score (female, non-smoker, history of motion sickness or PONV). Also, intraoperative remifentanil infusion was risk factor independent of postoperative opioid use. As the incidence of PONV was up to 50% according to the number of risk factors, risk-adapted, multimodal or combination therapy should be applied.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/*adverse effects
;
Analgesics, Opioid/*adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Antiemetics/administration & dosage/therapeutic use
;
Female
;
Fentanyl/*adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Isoflurane/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Piperidines/*adverse effects/therapeutic use
;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/chemically induced/*epidemiology
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
10.Factors Affecting Unused Remaining Volume of Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia in Patients Following Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery.
Kyoung Ok KIM ; Ju Won ROH ; Eun Jung SHIN ; Junyong IN ; Tae Hun SONG
Asian Nursing Research 2014;8(4):300-304
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the factors affecting the unused remaining volume of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) in patients who had undergone laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively collected patient records from pre-existing PCA log sheets from 98 patients. Surgical factors and IV PCA-related data including remaining volume, administration duration, early discontinuation (yes or no), and adverse reactions were recorded. Chi-square test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression were applied for data analysis. RESULTS: The average age of the 98 patients was 40.0 +/- 8.24 years. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and early discontinuation were not statistically significant among the different surgical groups (p = .540 and p = .338, respectively). Twenty-eight patients wanted discontinuation of IV PCA and the remaining volume was 33.6 +/- 7.8 mL (range 20-55 mL). The significant determinants of remaining volume were whether IV PCA was discontinued due to PONV and duration of surgery (p < .001). The surgical duration was inversely correlated with the remaining volume. CONCLUSION: Early discontinuation of IV PCA due to PONV is a major contributing factor to wastage of medicine. Prevention and treatment of PONV is needed to encourage patients to maintain PCA use for pain control.
Administration, Intravenous/*adverse effects/utilization
;
Adult
;
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/*adverse effects/utilization
;
Female
;
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/*adverse effects
;
Humans
;
Laparoscopy/*adverse effects
;
Middle Aged
;
Pain Management/*adverse effects/utilization
;
Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
;
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/*chemically induced
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Young Adult