1.Association Between Diabetes and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Ana Paula PAGANO ; Bruna Ramos da SILVA ; Flávio Teixeira VIEIRA ; Luiz Fernando Meira FILHO ; Sarah A. PURCELL ; John D. LEWIS ; Michelle L. MACKENZIE ; Paula J. ROBSON ; Jennifer E. VENA ; Flávia Moraes SILVA ; Carla M. PRADO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):304-320
Purpose:
Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
Results:
Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low.
Conclusions
Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.
2.Association Between Diabetes and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Ana Paula PAGANO ; Bruna Ramos da SILVA ; Flávio Teixeira VIEIRA ; Luiz Fernando Meira FILHO ; Sarah A. PURCELL ; John D. LEWIS ; Michelle L. MACKENZIE ; Paula J. ROBSON ; Jennifer E. VENA ; Flávia Moraes SILVA ; Carla M. PRADO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):304-320
Purpose:
Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
Results:
Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low.
Conclusions
Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.
3.Association Between Diabetes and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Ana Paula PAGANO ; Bruna Ramos da SILVA ; Flávio Teixeira VIEIRA ; Luiz Fernando Meira FILHO ; Sarah A. PURCELL ; John D. LEWIS ; Michelle L. MACKENZIE ; Paula J. ROBSON ; Jennifer E. VENA ; Flávia Moraes SILVA ; Carla M. PRADO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):304-320
Purpose:
Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
Results:
Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low.
Conclusions
Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.
4.Association Between Diabetes and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Ana Paula PAGANO ; Bruna Ramos da SILVA ; Flávio Teixeira VIEIRA ; Luiz Fernando Meira FILHO ; Sarah A. PURCELL ; John D. LEWIS ; Michelle L. MACKENZIE ; Paula J. ROBSON ; Jennifer E. VENA ; Flávia Moraes SILVA ; Carla M. PRADO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):304-320
Purpose:
Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
Results:
Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low.
Conclusions
Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.
5.Association Between Diabetes and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Ana Paula PAGANO ; Bruna Ramos da SILVA ; Flávio Teixeira VIEIRA ; Luiz Fernando Meira FILHO ; Sarah A. PURCELL ; John D. LEWIS ; Michelle L. MACKENZIE ; Paula J. ROBSON ; Jennifer E. VENA ; Flávia Moraes SILVA ; Carla M. PRADO
The World Journal of Men's Health 2025;43(2):304-320
Purpose:
Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk.
Materials and Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
Results:
Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low.
Conclusions
Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.
6.Autologous processed plasma: cytokine profile and effects upon injection into healthy equine joints.
Juliana J MOREIRA ; Ana Paula L MORAES ; Patricia M BROSSI ; Thais S L MACHADO ; Yara M MICHELACCI ; Cristina O MASSOCO ; Raquel Y A BACCARIN
Journal of Veterinary Science 2015;16(1):47-55
This experimental controlled study was performed to evaluate the composition of autologous processed plasma (APP), and the effects of APP intra-articular injection into healthy equine metacarpophalangeal joints. The effects on joints were analysed with a short-phase protocol and a prolonged-phase protocol using saline-injected joints as controls. For the short protocol, horses received one intra-articular APP injection. Synovial fluid samples were collected prior to the injection and 3, 6, 24, 48, and 16 h after treatment. For the prolonged protocol, the joints received three weekly injections of APP, and samples were collected at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days before APP administration. IL1-ra level was found to be increased in APP compared to plasma. Upon intra-articular administration of APP, transient (up to 24 h) increases in white blood cell (WBC) counts along with elevated protein and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations were observed in the treated joints. Over the 28-day observation period, APP did not elicit changes relative to baseline levels, but WBC counts, PGE2 and chondroitin sulphate concentrations were lower than those found in the control. In conclusion, APP intra-articular injection induced a mild and transitory inflammatory response but no inflammation reaction was observed over a longer period of treatment and observation.
Animals
;
Cytokines/*metabolism
;
*Horses
;
Injections, Intra-Articular
;
Metacarpophalangeal Joint/*drug effects
;
Plasma/*chemistry
;
Time Factors