No abstract available.
Amlodipine*

No abstract available.
Amlodipine*

No abstract available.
Amlodipine

61 pregnant women with moderate or severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure:  150 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure:  100 mmHg), the mean age was 32.11  6.16, were involved in a study. All participants have received aldomet (1g/day) and hydralazin (100 mg/day) for a week but their blood pressures were not reduced. In this study, they were treated by amlopidin. The monitoring these pregnant women and their fetuses have shown that amlopidin reduced both diastolic and systolic blood to an allowed level. Drug did not cause renal and liver functional disorder, and not change the glycemia and cholesterolemia but reduce the uremia. The drug did not cause any complications for fetus.
Hypertension ; Amlodipine

The open clinical assays method that to evaluate the results of treatment of hypertension by amlodipin in 61 women with gravidic intoxication, ages of from 24 to 46. Results shown that successful rate is 54/61; amlodipin didn't cause dysfunction of liver and kidney, didn't change the concentration of blood glucose and cholesterol but decreased blood urea, drug can induced the headache, dizziness but these symptoms is slight and self-reversible. Regarding foetus, Apgar index can be approached and there is not manifestation of monster and foetus death
Hypertension ; Amlodipine

No abstract available.
Amlodipine* ; Humans ; Hypertension*

The results of treatment of high blood presure in pregnant intoxication on 61 pregnant women are as follows: success rate 54/61 (88.52%). Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly in comparing with the use of Aldomet in combining with Hydralazin (p < 0.05). No sign of liver and kidney failures were reported, no increase of serum glucose and serum cholesterol, blood creatinine decreased nonsignificantly (p > 0.05), uremia decreased significantly. For the fetus, Apgar index was tolerable, no sign of monster and stillbirth. Conclusion: Amlodipin is good drug for treating high blood pressure in pregnant intoxication.
Therapy ; Amlodipine ; Pregnant Women ; Hypertension

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the antihypertensive effect of S-(-)-amlodipine nicotinate with ramipril in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: Total 138 patients (54.5 +/- 10.5 years, 69 males) were enrolled in this study between 2008 and 2010. Amlodipine 2.5 mg or ramipril 2.5 mg was treated once in a day for 8 weeks. Epidemiologic analysis was performed in intend-to-treat (ITT) group. Efficacy analysis was performed in the differences of diastolic blood pressure in study groups. Abnormal reactions were divided with severities and drug-relationship. RESULTS: The change of diastolic blood pressures were more prominent with -12.7 +/- 7.02 mm Hg in amlodipine group, and -9.6 +/- 7.38 mm Hg in ramipril group (p = 0.023). The change of systolic blood pressures was higher in amlodipine group with -18.1 +/- 7.91 mm Hg, and -14.3 +/- 11.96 mm Hg in ramipril group (p = 0.047). Blood pressure normalization rates were 81.3% (48 of 59 patients) in amlodipine group, and 61.4% (35 of 57 patients) in ramipril group (p = 0.017). Abnormal reaction occurred in 5.8% (4 of 68 patients) of amlodipine group and 14.2% (10 of 70 patients) of ramipril group (p = 0.102). The most frequent abnormal reaction was respiratory symptom. CONCLUSIONS: S-Amlodipine-Nicotinate was more effective than ramipril in hypertensive patients without significant abnormal reaction.
Amlodipine ; Blood Pressure ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Niacin ; Ramipril

BACKGROUND: In previous study, hypertensive patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction showed delayed relaxation time intervals and increased relaxation nonuniformity of regional wall motion. In this point of view, the effects of amlodipine on the regional wall motion and mitral flow patterns were evaluated. METHODS: Before and 32weeks after the antihypertensive medication of amlodipine, M-mode & Doppler echocardiogram were performed in 14 patients with moderate hypertension. We measured A2 to the peak thinning rate point of left ventricular(LV)posterior wall [A2-(-)dpw/dt] and the peak lengthening rate point of mitral annulus [A2-dL/dt] on M-mode echocardiogram and we defined nonuniformity as the time interval, (-)dpw/dt-dL/dt. RESULTS: 1) Mitral flow velocity E/A ratio was increased (0.95+/-0.4 vs 1.42+/-0.6, p<0.05) after amlodipine medication. 2) Heart rate and LV posterior wall thickness was decreased (79+/-9.3 vs 72+/-10.8 beats/min, 10.7+/-1.5 vs 9.4+/-2.0mm, p<0.05 respectively). 3) Long axis relaxation was improved (A2-dL/dt ; 165+/-44 vs 140+/-23msec, p<0.05) and nonuniformity index was decreased ((-)dpw/dt-dL/dt ; 63+/-49 vs 41+/-30msec p=0.07). CONCLUSION: Amlodipine improved E/A ratio of mitral flow (E/A ratio) in hypertensive patients with diastolic dysfunction, which could be attributed to the decreased heart rate, the decrease in wall thickness and the improvement in relaxation movement of LV long axis.
Amlodipine* ; Axis, Cervical Vertebra ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Hypertension* ; Relaxation

OBJECTIVE: The EXforge Clinical evaluation of amlodlpine and valsarTan in hypErtension (EXCITE) study was designed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of amlodipine/valsartan (Aml/Val) and amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val/HCT) single-pill combination (SPC) in patients with hypertension.
METHODOLOGY: This 26-week observational, multicenter, prospective, open-label study included patients aged ? 18 years of age with established diagnosis of hypertension. The change in mean sitting systolic BP (msSBP), diastolic BP (msDBP) from baseline to Week 26, proportion of patients achieving BP goal (msSBP/msDBP <130/80 mmHg and <140/90 mmHg for patients with and without diabetes,respectively) at endpoint, and safety were monitored. Here, we report the data of patients from the Philippines.
RESULTS: Of the total 1,054 patients in the full analysis set (Aml/Val, n=928; Aml/Val/HCTZ, n=126), 923 (87.6%) patients completed the study. The baseline BP was 158.5/96.5 and 167.0/99.5 mmHg in the Aml/Val and Aml/Val/HCTZ groups,respectively. Significant reductions in msSBP and msDBP from baseline to week 26 were observed with both Aml/Val (-31.9/-19.2 mmHg). Adverse events were reported by 8.8% of the patients.
CONCLUSION: The Aml/Val and Aml/Val/HCTZ SPCs were effective in controlling BP and were generally well tolerated in patients with hypertension from the Philippines.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Amlodipine ; Amlodipine, Valsartan Drug Combination ; Diabetes Mellitus ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; Hypertension ; Philippines ; Tetrazoles ; Valine ; Valsartan