No abstract available.
Air Ambulances* ; Emergencies*

OBJECTIVE: Helicopter ambulance transport (HAT) is a highly resource-intensive facility that is a well-established part of the trauma transport system in many developed countries. Here, we review the benefit of HAT for neurosurgical patients in Korea. METHODS: This retrospective study followed neurotrauma patients who were transferred by HAT to a single emergency trauma center over a period of 2 years. The clinical benefits of HAT were measured according to the necessity of emergency surgical intervention and the differences in the time taken to transport patients by ground ambulance transport (GAT) and HAT. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were transferred to a single university hospital using HAT, of whom 32 were taken to the neurosurgery department. Of these 32 patients, 10 (31.3%) needed neurosurgical intervention, 14 (43.8%) needed non-neurosurgical intervention, 3 (9.4%) required both, and 11 (34.4%) did not require any intervention. The transfer time was faster using HAT than the estimated time needed for GAT, although for a relatively close distance (<50 km) without ground obstacles (mountain or sea) HAT did not improve transfer time. The cost comparison showed that HAT was more expensive than GAT (3,292,000 vs. 84,000 KRW, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this Korean-based study, we found that HAT has a clinical benefit for neurotrauma cases involving a transfer from a distant site or an isolated area. A more precise triage for using HAT should be considered to prevent overuse of this expensive transport method.
Air Ambulances* ; Ambulances ; Developed Countries ; Emergencies ; Humans ; Korea ; Neurosurgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Trauma Centers ; Triage

Background: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, health care for patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been suboptimal. Objective: To describe the demographic, clinical, and logistical characteristics of patients who experienced OHCA during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: Descriptive study. Participants: 136 males and 58 females, aged 8 days to 89 years old, who experienced OHCA and were subsequently sent to the emergency department of Southern Philippines Medical Center (SPMC). Setting: Southern Philippines Medical Center, Davao City, March 15 to December 31, 2020. Main outcome measures: Demographic, clinical, and logistical characteristics of patients. Main results: Of the 194 patients, 149 (76.80%) experienced OHCA at home. Among them, 42 (21.65%) received initial CPR at the scene, with 36 (85.71%) of these procedures performed by ambulance crews. Only one (0.52%) patient received automated extracorporeal defibrillation performed by a bystander. There were 147 (75.77%) patients who were transported by private vehicles. The average times for dispatch, response and turnaround of the emergency medical services (EMS) were 8 minutes, 19 minutes, and 56 minutes, respectively. Of the 194 patients, 176 (90.72%) were transported without ongoing resuscitation. Upon arrival at the emergency department, 184 (94.84%) patients had unknown arrest rhythm. Only one (0.52%) patient had a return of spontaneous circulation and was admitted to the ICU. All the other patients expired within 10 to 15 minutes upon arriving at the emergency department. Conclusion In this study, most OHCAs happened at home, with few receiving CPR at the scene, primarily from ambulance crews. The average EMS response time was 19 minutes. Most patients were transported from the scene without ongoing resuscitation, and had an unknown arrest rhythm upon arrival at the emergency department. All patients expired shortly after arriving at the emergency department.
Resuscitation ; Ambulances

The development of burn units in our country is now undergoing a trend of geographic centralization and regionalization. To solve the problems like severe burn patients are too far away from burn units, overloaded operation in regional burn centers when mass burn accidents happen, and growing requirement for aeromedical transportation, etc., it is now the top priority to improve national aeromedical transportation system for burn patients. Expert teams from Chinese Burn Association, National Aeromedical Rescue Base, and China Association for Disaster & Emergency Rescue Medicine discussed and reached a consensus on the key points of aeromedical transportation of burn patients, including organizational structure, staff and materials, and three links before, during, and after aeromedical transportation. The consensus aims to provide guidance for a safe, efficient, and standardized operation of aeromedical transportation for burn patients in China.
Accidents ; Air Ambulances ; Burn Units ; Consensus ; Disasters ; Humans

Recent evidence has demonstrated the survival benefits of helicopter transport for trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of hospital-based helicopter emergency medical services (H-HEMS) in comparison with ground ambulance transport in improving mortality outcomes in patients with major trauma. Study participants were divided into 2 groups according to type of transport to the trauma center; that is, either via ground emergency medical services (GEMS) or via H-HEMS. The study was conducted from October 2013 to July 2015. Mortality outcomes in the H-HEMS group were compared with those in the GEMS group by using the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) analysis. The number of participants finally included in the study was 312. Among these patients, 63 were adult major trauma patients transported via H-HEMS, and 47.6% were involved in traffic accidents. For interhospital transport, the Z and W statistics revealed significantly higher scores in the H-HEMS group than in the GEMS group (Z statistic, 2.02 vs. 1.16; P = 0.043 vs. 0.246; W statistic, 8.87 vs. 2.85), and 6.02 more patients could be saved per 100 patients when H-HEMS was used for transportation. TRISS analysis revealed that the use of H-HEMS for transporting adult major trauma patients was associated with significantly improved survival compared to the use of GEMS.
Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft* ; Ambulances ; Emergencies* ; Emergency Medical Services* ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Mortality* ; Transportation ; Trauma Centers ; Wounds and Injuries

No abstract available.
Ambulances* ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*

No abstract available.
Ambulances* ; Emergencies* ; Gangwon-do*

OBJECTIVE: Ambulance personnel who witness trauma experienced by patients have been reported to experience positive changes, known as vicarious posttraumatic growth (VPTG). We examined VPTG and its relationship with social support and resilience among ambulance personnel. METHODS: The sample (n=227) was recruited from six emergency centers in China. The measures included the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI), the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), and the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). Structure Equation Modeling (SEM) and the bootstrapping procedure were used to examine indirect effects. RESULTS: The participants' mean score for VPTG was 68.96 (SD=15.51). Social support had significant direct effects on resilience (β=0.51, p < 0.001) and VPTG (β=0.25, p=0.001), and resilience (β=0.58, p < 0.001) had a significant direct effect on VPTG. Furthermore, social support had a significant indirect effect (0.51×0.58=0.30, p < 0.001) on VPTG through resilience. CONCLUSION: Although the nature of the work of ambulance personnel is not expected to change, the negative effects of the trauma they encounter can be reduced by providing them with more support resources and interventions to foster their resilience, which in turn, promote VPTG.
Ambulances* ; China* ; Emergencies ; Humans

PURPOSE: The Ministry of Health and Welfare of korea started operating the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) System in 2011 to improve emergency medical services given by physicians aboard helicopters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the HEMS education program for its effectiveness and satisfaction from trainees. METHODS: A survey of trainees was conducted at the very end of training and education. Trainees for a HEMS crew surveyed included doctors (8), nurses (4), emergency medical technicians (12), pilots (10), flight dispatchers (4) and an administrator (1). The study period was from August 8, 2011 to August 12, 2011. The amount of HEMS education was 16 hours, including 8 hours of theoretical education, 5 hours of simulation and 3 hours of table-top simulation. RESULTS: In an analysis of programs according to trainee satisfaction, the theoretical training program received an average of 4.2+/-0.7 points and; the practical and simulation training program received; 4.4+/-0.8 points. The simulated practical training program thus received a higher score than theoretical education, but the difference was insignificant (p=0.834). CONCLUSION: For the HEMS training programs, the practical and simulation training satisfaction score were higher than the theoretical program. A focus on simulation programs for HEMS could therefore serve as a goal of the HEMS education program.
Administrative Personnel ; Air Ambulances ; Aircraft ; Emergency Medical Services ; Emergency Medical Technicians ; Humans ; Korea ; Republic of Korea

OBJECTIVETo analyze the opportunity and condition of aeromedical transportation in critically burn patients.

METHODSEighteen severely burn patients were operated by aeromedical transportation. Among them, four patients were transported in the shock stage and fourteen patients were transported after shock stage. Some aspects of treatment were introduced including escharectomy,clinical index, equipment of medicine, and so on. The transportation card and abstract of case file were recorded carefully before aeromedical transportation. When there were over 2 patients, those with more severe burns received the treatment in the priority.

RESULTSEach aeromedical transportation airplane carried 1 to 6 cases, and flies 420 to 2 500 km for 1.5 to 3. 5 hours. The patients were safely arrived at destination. Except one died for multiple organ failure, others were cured during further treatment.

CONCLUSIONProvide that the conditions were permissive and preparation were adequate, it is safe to carry out aeromedical transportation during shock stage.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Air Ambulances ; Burns ; therapy ; Critical Illness ; Humans ; Male ; Shock ; therapy ; Young Adult