1.Push-out bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement used as endodontic sealer.
Eduardo Diogo GURGEL-FILHO ; Felipe Coelho LIMA ; Vicente de Paula Aragao SABOIA ; Tauby de Souza COUTINHO-FILHO ; Aline de Almeida NEVES ; Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal da SILVA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2014;39(4):282-287
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the bond strength of RelyX Unicem (3M) to root canal dentin when used as an endodontic sealer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples of 24 single-rooted teeth were prepared with Gates Glidden drills and K3 files. After that, the roots were randomly assigned to three experimental groups (n = 8) according to the filling material, (1) AH Plus (Dentsply De Trey GmbH)/Gutta-Percha cone; (2) Epiphany SE (Pentron)/Resilon cone; (3) RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha cone. All roots were filled using a single cone technique associated to vertical condensation. After the filling procedures, each tooth was prepared for a push-out bond strenght test by cutting 1 mm-thick root slices. Loading was performed on a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey test for multiple comparisons were used to compare the results among the experimental groups. RESULTS: Epiphany SE/Resilon showed significantly lower push-out bond strength than both AH Plus/Gutta-Percha and RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bond strength between AH Plus/Gutta-Percha and RelyX Unicem/Gutta-Percha (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the present in vitro conditions, bond strength to root dentin promoted by RelyX Unicem was similar to AH Plus. Epiphany SE/Resilon resulted in lower bond strength values when compared to both materials.
Dental Pulp Cavity
;
Dentin
;
Resin Cements*
;
Root Canal Filling Materials
;
Tooth
2.Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems.
Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal SILVA ; Brenda Leite MUNIZ ; Frederico PIRES ; Felipe Goncalves BELLADONNA ; Aline Almeida NEVES ; Erick Miranda SOUZA ; Gustavo DE-DEUS
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2016;41(1):1-5
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of ProTaper Gold (PTG, Dentsply Maillefer) in maintaining the original profile of root canal anatomy. For that, ProTaper Universal (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer) was used as reference techniques for comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty simulated curved canals manufactured in clear resin blocks were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 10) according to the system used for canal instrumentation: PTU and PTG groups, upto F2 files (25/0.08). Color stereomicroscopic images from each block were taken exactly at the same position before and after instrumentation. All image processing and data analysis were performed with an open source program (FIJI). Evaluation of canal transportation was obtained for two independent canal regions: straight and curved levels. Student's t test was used with a cut-off for significance set at alpha = 5%. RESULTS: Instrumentation systems significantly influenced canal transportation (p < 0.0001). A significant interaction between instrumentation system and root canal level (p < 0.0001) was found. PTU and PTG systems produced similar canal transportation at the straight part, while PTG system resulted in lower canal transportation than PTU system at the curved part. Canal transportation was higher at the curved canal portion (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PTG system produced overall less canal transportation in the curved portion when compared to PTU system.
Dental Pulp Cavity
;
Statistics as Topic
;
Transportation*
3.Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems.
Emmanuel Joao Nogueira Leal SILVA ; Brenda Leite MUNIZ ; Frederico PIRES ; Felipe Goncalves BELLADONNA ; Aline Almeida NEVES ; Erick Miranda SOUZA ; Gustavo DE-DEUS
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2016;41(1):1-5
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of ProTaper Gold (PTG, Dentsply Maillefer) in maintaining the original profile of root canal anatomy. For that, ProTaper Universal (PTU, Dentsply Maillefer) was used as reference techniques for comparison. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty simulated curved canals manufactured in clear resin blocks were randomly assigned to 2 groups (n = 10) according to the system used for canal instrumentation: PTU and PTG groups, upto F2 files (25/0.08). Color stereomicroscopic images from each block were taken exactly at the same position before and after instrumentation. All image processing and data analysis were performed with an open source program (FIJI). Evaluation of canal transportation was obtained for two independent canal regions: straight and curved levels. Student's t test was used with a cut-off for significance set at alpha = 5%. RESULTS: Instrumentation systems significantly influenced canal transportation (p < 0.0001). A significant interaction between instrumentation system and root canal level (p < 0.0001) was found. PTU and PTG systems produced similar canal transportation at the straight part, while PTG system resulted in lower canal transportation than PTU system at the curved part. Canal transportation was higher at the curved canal portion (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PTG system produced overall less canal transportation in the curved portion when compared to PTU system.
Dental Pulp Cavity
;
Statistics as Topic
;
Transportation*