BACKGROUND: Alfentanil has been shown to act synergistically if combined with propofol, with or without nitrous oxide, or if combined with potent inhalation anesthetics. The goal of this study was to determine the dosing rate and target plasma concentration of propofol to supplement nitrous oxide in the presence of varying concentrations of alfentanil and to determine the optimal combination of propofol and alfentanil. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) were anesthetized with nitrous oxide, and given a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of alfentanil [target plasma concentrations of 0 (A0 group), 50 ng/ml (A50 group), and 100 ng/ml (A100 group)], and propofol at rates varied up and down depending on the bispectal index (BIS). The mean target concentration (Tc) and infusion rate of propofol according to changes of concentrations of alfentanil were determined. Recovery time (from infusion stop to eye opening) and side effects were compared. RESULTS: Induction time and recovery time were shortened in the A50 group and A100 group compared with the A0 group (P < 0.05). The infusion rate and mean target concentration of propofol were significantly lower in the A100 group (7.5 mg/kg/h, 3.4ng/ml) than the A0 (12.6 mg/kg/h, 4.5ng/ml) and A50 (10.2 mg/kg/h, 4.0ng/ml) groups (P < 0.01). Side effects did not differ among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal blood propofol and plasma alfentanil concentration, with respect to satisfactory intraoperative anesthetic conditions and speed of recovery, are 4.0ng/ml and 50 ng/ml or 3.4ng/ ml and 100 ng/ml in TAH patients.
Alfentanil* ; Anesthetics, Inhalation ; Humans ; Hysterectomy* ; Nitrous Oxide ; Plasma ; Propofol*

BACKGROUND: The lower levels of cardiotoxicity and motor block make ropivacaine well suited as an epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia. This study examined the analgesic efficacy of an epidural infusion of ropivacaine alone and in combination with alfentanil after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were divided into two groups receiving patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia with 0.2% ropivacaine (Group I) and 0.15% ropivacaine +150 microgram/ml alfentanil (Group II). The motor block, side effects, VAS (visual analog pain scale) score on coughing and resting, additional analgesics use, and patient's satisfaction were checked for 24 hours after a loading dose injection. RESULTS: The VAS score in group II was significantly lower than in group I, and the patients in group II were more satisfied than those in group I (P < 0.05). However, there were more side effects in group II. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine with 150 microgram/ml alfentanil is more effective than 0.2% ropivacaine only.
Alfentanil* ; Analgesia* ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia, General ; Cough ; Humans

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized double-blinded study was to determine the optimal concentration of alfentanil with 0.15% ropivacaine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. METHODS: Forty five patients undergoing major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were assigned to groups receiving patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia with 0.15% ropivacaine + 45 microgram/ml alfentanil (Group I), 75microgram/ml alfentanil (Group II), 150 microgram/ml alfentanil (Group III). The incidence of side effects and additional analgesic use, VAS (visual analog pain scale) on resting and coughing, and patient's satisfaction were checked for 24 hours after a loading dose injection. RESULTS: The VAS on coughing and resting 1 hour after the loading dose injection were significantly lower in Groups II and III than in Group I. The patients in group II were more satisfied with the result than those in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of 0.15% ropivacaine and 75microgram/ml alfentanil for thoracic epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery provides the best analgesia with minimal side effects and a higher level of patient's satisfaction.
Alfentanil* ; Analgesia ; Analgesia, Epidural* ; Anesthesia, General ; Cough ; Humans ; Incidence

BACKGROUND: The administration of short-acting opioids before emergence is useful for preventing emergence cough induced by an endotracheal tube. This study examined the clinically effective dose of alfentanil for suppressing cough during emergence from desflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult patients undergoing elective oral surgery were enrolled in this study. During emergence from anesthesia, the patients received alfentanil diluted in 10 ml normal saline when the end-tidal vol% of desflurane decreased to 3%. The initial alfentanil dose was 16 microg/kg. The alfentanil dose for consecutive patients, determined by Dixon's up-and-down method, increased or decreased by 2 microg/kg according to a previous patient's result. RESULTS: The 50% effective dose (ED50) of alfentanil for suppressing cough during emergence from desflurane anaesthesia was 9.3 +/- 1.5 microg/kg according to Dixon's up-and-down method. Isotonic regression revealed an ED50 and ED95 (95% confidence interval) of alfentanil 10.0 microg/kg (6.8-13.2 microg/kg) and 14.0 microg/kg (7.7-19.4 microg/kg), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ED95 of alfentanil for suppressing emergence cough was 14.0 microg/kg. A single bolus administration of alfentanil during emergence from anesthesia was useful for suppressing emergence cough.
Adult ; Alfentanil ; Analgesics, Opioid ; Anesthesia ; Cough ; Humans ; Isoflurane ; Surgery, Oral

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative alfentanil is known to increase the epileptic discharge in the adult seizure patients. This study hypothesized that alfentanil might localize an epileptogenic focus in pediatric seizure patients. METHODS: This study was performed in the pediatric seizure patients who undergo second-staged operation. Thirteen pediatric patients were enrolled and their epileptic foci were already suspected from first operation. After anesthetic induction, sevoflurane was maintained at 0.6% end-tidal concentration for study period. Electrocorticography (ECoG) was recorded for 5 minutes before and 5 minutes after alfentanil 20microgram/kg IV. During the ECoG recordings, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored. After the surgery, a pediatric neurologist analyzed the changes of spike frequencies of suspected ictal zone. The spike frequencies of suspected non-ictal zone were also calculated in five patients. The suspected ictal zone was defined as the most abundant spontaneous spiking area observed after first staged grid insertion. RESULTS: Alfentanil induced a significant increase in spike activity of suspected ictal zone in 12 out of 13 patients (median of 20 [ranged 10 to 100] vs 38 [ranged 20 to 100], P< 0.05). Alfentanil-induced increase of spike activity was prominent in the suspected ictal zone rather than non-ictal zone. There were no significant changes in the MAP and HR after administration of alfentanil. CONCLUSIONS: Alfentanil activates epileptiform activity of suspected ictal zone in pediatric patients with seizure disorder and can be used to assist in the localization of the epileptogenic focus during seizure surgery.
Adult ; Alfentanil* ; Arterial Pressure ; Epilepsy* ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Seizures*

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare the quality, hemodynamic response, and recovery index of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion after either propofol alone or co-administration of alfentanil-propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients (ASA 1 or 2, 17-63 years) were randomly allocated to control and experimental group. Control group(Group I) was received placebo (saline), experimental groups were received alfentanil 10microgram/kg (Group II), 20microgram/kg (Group III), 30microgram/kg (Group IV). RESULTS: Loss of consciousness and LMA insertion were more rapid in patients with alfentanil 30 microgram/kg group than control group (P<0.05). In alfentanil 20microgram/kg group, loss of consciousness was more rapid than control group. Also, there were significant differences in propofol induction dose, effect site concentration on induction, and propofol maintenance dose between control and experimental group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that co-adminstration of alfentanil-propofol, especially 30microgram/kg group, compares favorably with propofol alone, although LMA removal time is prolonged.
Alfentanil ; Anesthesia ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Laryngeal Masks* ; Propofol* ; Prospective Studies ; Unconsciousness

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the effect of pneumoperitoneum on the recovery from intense neuromuscular blockade by rocuronium in healthy patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery. METHODS: Thirty adult patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery were studied. Anesthesia was induced with 1.5 mg/kg of propofol, 12 ug/kg of alfentanil and 0.6 mg/kg of rocuronium and maintained with 2 vol% of sevoflurane and 0.05-0.2 microg/kg/min remifentanil. The neuromuscular relaxation was monitored by Train-of-Four (TOF) and post-tetanic count (PTC). Additional rocuronium of 0.2 mg/kg was administered for deep neuromuscular blockade at 30 min after pneumoperitoneum. Before (PPpre) and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (PPpost), PTC was measured at 6 min intervals. The relationship between PTC and the time interval to reappearance of T1 response was observed. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD of the intervals between the detection of 4 counts of the PTC and the first response to TOF stimulation was 13.0 +/- 1.1 min and 16.4 +/- 6.3 min PPpre and PPpost, respectively (P = 0.20). There were significant negative relationships between PTC observed and the time interval to reappearance of T1 response (adjusted R2 = 0.869, P < 0.001 for PPpre data, and adjusted R2 = 0.561, P < 0.001 for PPpost data). Comparing the difference of regression equation between PPpre and PPpost data using a parallelism test, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.193). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PP with intra-abdominal pressure at the level of 13-14 mmHg did not affect the recovery from intense neuromuscular blockade by rocuronium in healthy patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
Adult ; Alfentanil ; Anesthesia ; Humans ; Laparoscopy* ; Neuromuscular Blockade* ; Neuromuscular Monitoring ; Pneumoperitoneum* ; Propofol ; Relaxation

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane anesthesia is associated with emergence agitation in children. In this study, we compared the emergence and recovery profiles of children who received sevoflurane with fentanyl or alfentanil for inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Forty-five children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia for inguinal herniorraphy were assigned to three groups. Saline 0.1 ml/kg (group S), alfentanil 10microgram//kg (group A) or fentanyl 1microgram//kg (group F) was administered intravenously at the beginning of fascia closure. Duration of operation and anesthesia and emergence time were evaluated at the operating room. Agitation score, a degree of pain, the time of stay in PACU (postanesthetic care unit) and postoperative side effects were evaluated by a blinded observer at the PACU. RESULTS: The emergence time was prolonged in the group F compared to the other groups. The time of stay in PACU was prolonged in the group F compared to the group S. Group A and F had lower agitation score and pain score in comparison with that of the group S at the 0, 5, 10, 15 min in the PACU. Agitation score was also significantly lower in the group F compared to the group A at 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that intravenous administration of alfentanil 10microgram//kg or fentanyl 1microgram//kg at the closure of fascia could effectively reduce the agitation score. Alfentanil also does not delay from emergence and the time of stay in the PACU.
Administration, Intravenous ; Alfentanil* ; Anesthesia* ; Child* ; Dihydroergotamine* ; Fascia ; Fentanyl ; Herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Operating Rooms

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic techniques for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the patients undergoing thyroidectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients of ASA status I or II, undergoing thyroidectomy were studied. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups. Group 1 (n = 22): anesthesia was induced by propofol (2 mg/kg) and maintained with desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Group 2 (n = 22): anesthesia was induced and maintained propofol and alfentanil using a computer controlled infusion system in 60% medical air in oxygen. Group 3 (n = 16): anesthesia was induced propofol using computer controlled infusion system in combination 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The incidence of PONV was assessed at 6 and 24 hours after the surgery and standardized by Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting and retching (RINVR) score. RESULTS: In group 3, the incidence of PONV within the first 6 hours after surgery, was significantly lower as P < 0.05. But, there was no statistical differences among the three groups in the 6 to 24 hours' RINVR score after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The use of propofol for induction and maintenance with combination 50% N2O is the most effective technique at preventing PONV among the three groups within the first 6 hours after thyroidectomy. This study found no statistically significant difference between the RINVR score, using desflurane-N2O and propofol-alfentanil.
Alfentanil ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics ; Humans ; Incidence ; Nausea ; Nitrous Oxide ; Oxygen ; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting* ; Propofol ; Thyroidectomy* ; Vomiting

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the optimal anesthetic depth for the maintenance and recovery in interventional neuroradiology. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology were randomly allocated to light anesthesia (n = 44) or deep anesthesia (n = 44) groups based on the value of the bispectral index (BIS). Anesthesia was induced with propofol, alfentanil, and rocuronium and maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane. The concentration of sevoflurane was titrated to maintain BIS at 40-49 (deep anesthesia group) or 50-59 (light anesthesia group). Phenylephrine was used to maintain the mean arterial pressure within 20% of preinduction values. Recovery times were recorded. RESULTS: The light anesthesia group had a more rapid recovery to spontaneous ventilation, eye opening, extubation, and orientation (4.1 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.8 min, 6.9 +/- 3.2 min vs. 9.1 +/- 3.2 min, 8.2 +/- 3.1 min vs. 10.7 +/- 3.3 min, 10.0 +/- 3.9 min vs. 12.9 +/- 5.5 min, all P < 0.01) compared to the deep anesthesia group. The use of phenylephrine was significantly increased in the deep anesthesia group (768 +/- 184 vs. 320 +/- 82 microg, P < 0.01). More patients moved during the procedure in the light anesthesia group (6/44 [14%] vs. 0/44 [0%], P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: BIS values between 50 and 59 for interventional neuroradiology were associated with a more rapid recovery and favorable hemodynamic response, but also with more patient movement. We suggest that maintaining BIS values between 40 and 49 is preferable for the prevention of patient movement during anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology.
Alfentanil ; Anesthesia* ; Anesthesia, General ; Arterial Pressure ; Consciousness Monitors ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Phenylephrine ; Propofol ; Radiology, Interventional ; Ventilation