Vitamin D (vit-D) is essential for bone health, although many osteoporosis patients have low levels of 25-hydroxy-vit-D [25(OH)D]. This randomized, open-label study compared the effects of once weekly alendronate 70 mg containing 5600 IU vit-D3 (ALN/D5600) to alendronate 70 mg without additional vit-D (ALN) on the percent of patients with vit-D insufficiency [25(OH)D <15 ng/mL, primary endpoint] and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH, secondary endpoint) levels in postmenopausal, osteoporotic Korean women. Neuromuscular function was also measured. A total of 268 subjects were randomized. Overall, 35% of patients had vit-D insufficiency at baseline. After 16-weeks, there were fewer patients with vit-D insufficiency in the ALN/D5600 group (1.47%) than in the ALN group (41.67%) (p<0.001). Patients receiving ALN/D5600 compared with ALN were at a significantly decreased risk of vit-D insufficiency [odds ratio=0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00-0.08]. In the ALN/D5600 group, significant increases in serum 25(OH)D were observed at weeks 8 (9.60 ng/mL) and 16 (11.41 ng/mL), where as a significant decrease was recorded in the ALN group at week 16 (-1.61 ng/mL). By multiple regression analysis, major determinants of increases in serum 25(OH)D were ALN/D5600 administration, seasonal variation, and baseline 25(OH)D. The least squares mean percent change from baseline in serum PTH in the ALN/D5600 group (8.17%) was lower than that in the ALN group (29.98%) (p=0.0091). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in neuromuscular function. Overall safety was similar between groups. In conclusion, the administration of 5600 IU vit-D in the ALN/D5600 group improved vit-D status and reduced the magnitude of PTH increase without significant side-effects after 16 weeks in Korean osteoporotic patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Alendronate/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Cholecalciferol/adverse effects/deficiency/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy ; Vitamin D Deficiency/*drug therapy

The aim of our study was to evaluate the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract side effect profile in 759 female patients that had taken alendronate (10 mg/day), for at least 6 months, for the treatment of osteoporosis, in relation to the safety of alendronate and the compliance of patients to its absorption rules. This study was a multicentered retrospective, clinical, non- placebo controlled, study of 759 female subjects carried out at 26 centres in 6 different regions of Turkey. The mean age of our patients was 62.6+/-8.6, with 51.2%in the age range 60 to 69 years. 158 patients (20.8%) were considered to have upper GI tract complaints with nausea as the most often encountered symptom. Of the subjects with upper GI tract complaints, 20% reported discontinued drug use, and 30% reported the requirement of an additional drug in order to abolish their complaints. Approximately 537 (71%) of the patients stated they had been given written information about the administration of the drug, and at least 93 patients (12%) and 73 patients (18.4%) acknowledged non compliance with the safety and absorption rules, respectively. In our study, no significant difference was found between the adherence to the safety measures and upper GI tract complaints (p > 0.05), but that upper GI tract complaints were higher in patients taking additional medication to alendronate (p < 0.05).
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alendronate/*adverse effects ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases/*chemically induced ; Human ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis/*drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of alendronate on the prevention and treatment of aseptic loosening of prosthesis.

METHODSA rat model of particle-induced osteolysis was used. Thirty-xis SD rats were divided into three groups: negative control group, positive control group and experiment group. Alendronate was administered by ig in experiment group. Positive control group and experiment group received intro-articular injections of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particles at 4, 6, 8, 10 weeks postoperatively. Negative control group was received injection with mixture solution of mouse serum and PBS only. All animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks after operation for histologic examination. In vitro human peripheral blood mononuclear (PBMC)were separated and cultured and divided into five groups as group A: PBMC group, group B: PBMC and particles,group C:PBMC and particles with 10(-4) mol/L alendronate, group D:PBMC and particles with 10(-5) mol/L alendronate, group E: PBMC and particles with 10(-6) mol/L alendronate. The production of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha in each group were tested.

RESULTSAlendronate could prevent particle-induced osteolysis. The production of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha was inhibited when alendronate was used.

CONCLUSIONAlendronate can inhibit bone absorptive factors expression induced by wear particles and may be used in the prevention and treatment of aseptic loosening of prosthesis.

Alendronate ; administration & dosage ; Animals ; Cytokines ; metabolism ; Female ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; adverse effects ; Joints ; metabolism ; surgery ; Male ; Osteolysis ; drug therapy ; metabolism ; prevention & control ; Prosthesis Failure ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was performed to compare the mucosal findings after esophagogastroduodenoscopy in two groups before and after the use of alendronate only and following administration of the enteric-coated alendronate (5 mg) and calcitriol (0.5 microg) combined drug (Maxmarvil, Yuyu Co.). METHODS: The study population consisted of 33 postmenopausal healthy female volunteers, aged 50 to 70 years (mean age, 58 +/- 5) without gastrointestinal symptoms and with normal baseline endoscopic findings. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed at baseline and was repeated 2 weeks later after daily intake of Maxmarvil (n = 17 subjects) or alendronate only (n = 16 subjects). Mucosal injury scores were reported by an endoscopist after 2 weeks of treatment with each medication schedule. RESULTS: Esophageal mucosal injuries developed in two of 16 subjects in the alendronate only group and 0 of 17 in the Maxmarvil group. Gastric mucosal injuries developed in eight subjects in the alendronate group and four subjects in the Maxmarvil group; this difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The mucosal damage scores for the alendronate group (total score 24) were significantly higher than those for the Maxmarvil group (total score 9) in the esophagus and stomach. Therefore, this study suggested that enteric-coated Maxmarvil is less harmful to gastrointestinal mucosa than alendronate, and may improve the tolerability of osteoporosis medication in clinical practice.
Administration, Oral ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Alendronate/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Calcitriol/administration & dosage/*adverse effects ; Drug Combinations ; *Endoscopy, Digestive System ; Esophagus/*drug effects/pathology ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/*drug effects/pathology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; *Postmenopause ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Republic of Korea ; Sex Factors ; Tablets, Enteric-Coated ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vitamins/administration & dosage/*adverse effects

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of alendronate on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis(GIO). METHODS: Thirty-five GIO patients were enrolled. Ten milligrams alendronate were prescribed daily for 6 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DEXA) after and before the treatment. RESULTS: BMD at lumbar, neck and trochanter sites of the 35 patients after the treatment was significantly increased compared with those before the treatment (P<0.05). Urine Ca/Cr level was decreased (P<0.05). There was no severe side effect. CONCLUSION Alendronate is effective and well tolerated for GIO.
Adult ; Alendronate ; therapeutic use ; Bone Density ; drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis ; chemically induced ; drug therapy ; Prednisone ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Rheumatic Fever ; drug therapy

The purpose of this open-labeled prospective study was to compare the treatment effects of cyclical etidronate and alendronate on the lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone resorption, and back pain in elderly women with osteoporosis. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, age ranging from 55 to 86 years (mean: 70.7 years), were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group: the cyclical etidronate group (etidronate 200 mg daily for 2 weeks every 3 months) and the alendronate group (5 mg daily). The BMD of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) measured by DXA, the urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) level measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and back pain evaluated by the face scale score were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, body mass index, years since menopause, lumbar BMD, urinary NTX level, and face scale score between the two treatment groups. Etidronate treatment sustained the lumbar BMD following a reduction in the urinary NTX level and improved back pain, while alendronate treatment reduced the urinary NTX level more significantly, resulting in an increase in the lumbar BMD, and similarly improved back pain. No serious adverse events were observed in either group. This study confirmed that alendronate treatment had a greater efficacy than etidronate treatment in increasing the lumbar BMD through the reduction of bone resorption in elderly women with osteoporosis.
Spinal Fractures/prevention & control/radiography ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy ; Middle Aged ; Lumbar Vertebrae/*drug effects ; Humans ; Female ; Etidronic Acid/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Bone Density/*drug effects ; Biological Markers/blood/urine ; Back Pain/drug therapy ; Alendronate/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aged

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of alendronate and raloxifene on lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, and lipid metabolism in elderly women with osteoporosis. Subjects and Methods: One hundred twenty-two postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (mean age: 69.4 years) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 61 patients: the alendronate group and the raloxifene group. BMD of the lumbar spine, urinary level of cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), and serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total cholesterol (TC), high and low density lipoprotein cholesterols (LDL-C and HDL-C, respectively), and triglycerides (TG) were measured during the 12-month-treatment period. RESULTS: The trial in 50 patients in the alendronate group and 52 patients in the raloxifene group could be completed. Both alendronate and raloxifene increased lumbar BMD (+8.0% and +2.4% at 12 months, respectively), followed by reductions of urinary NTX level and serum ALP level; however, the effects of alendronate were more pronounced than those of raloxifene. Only raloxifene reduced the serum levels of TC and LDL-C (-3.9% and -7.7% at 12 months, respectively), without any significant effect on the serum HDL-C and TG levels. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed the efficacy of alendronate greater than raloxifene in increasing lumbar BMD through its effect on marked reduction of the bone turnover more than by raloxifene, and some beneficial effects of raloxifene on lipid metabolism in elderly women with osteoporosis.
Aged ; Alendronate/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use ; Biological Markers/blood ; Bone Density/*drug effects ; Calcium/blood ; Female ; Fractures, Bone/prevention & control ; Humans ; Lipid Metabolism/*drug effects ; Osteoporosis/*drug therapy/*metabolism ; Phosphorus/blood ; Raloxifene/adverse effects/pharmacology/*therapeutic use ; Spine/drug effects

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of monthly oral 150 mg ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine treatment efficacy and safety outcomes between monthly oral 150 mg ibandronate and weekly 70 mg alendronate, daily 2.5 mg ibandronate, and a placebo. RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Once-monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy was clinically comparable to weekly 70 mg alendronate, showing increased bone mineral density (BMD) in both the lumbar spine and total hip. Pooled data from two cross-over trials showed that significantly more women with PMO preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy (relative risk [RR], 2.422; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.111 to 2.825; p < 1 x 10(-8)) and found the monthly ibandronate regimen more convenient than the weekly alendronate regimen (RR, 3.096; 95% CI, 2.622 to 3.622; p < 1 x 10(-8)). Monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy resulted in a significantly higher change in BMD of the lumbar spine than with the placebo. A once monthly 150 mg regimen produced greater increases in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD than daily treatment, with a similar incidence of adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once monthly 150 mg ibandronate therapy was clinically comparable to weekly 70 mg alendronate, and patients strongly preferred the convenience of monthly ibandronate over weekly alendronate. Monthly 150 mg ibandronate was superior to, and as well tolerated as, the daily treatment.
Administration, Oral ; Alendronate/administration & dosage ; Bone Density/drug effects ; Bone Density Conservation Agents/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Bone and Bones/drug effects/radiography ; Diphosphonates/*administration & dosage/adverse effects ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/*drug therapy/radiography ; Patient Preference ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome