No abstract available.
Alendronate* ; Animals ; Rats*

No abstract available.
Alendronate* ; Animals ; Diphosphonates ; Rats*

No abstract available.
Alendronate ; Cell Proliferation

No abstract available.
Alendronate ; Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Vitamin D ; Vitamins

No abstract available.
Alendronate ; Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Vitamin D ; Vitamins

PURPOSE: Alendronate has been proposed as a local and systemic drug treatment used as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for the treatment of periodontitis. However, its effectiveness has yet to be conclusively established. The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of SRP with alendronate on periodontitis compared to SRP alone. METHODS: Five electronic databases were used by 2 independent reviewers to identify relevant articles from the earliest records up to September 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SRP with alendronate to SRP with placebo in the treatment of periodontitis were included. The outcome measures were changes in bone defect fill, probing depth (PD), and clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline to 6 months. A fixed-effect or random-effect model was used to pool the extracted data, as appropriate. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane χ² and I2 tests. RESULTS: After the selection process, 8 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with SRP alone, the adjunctive mean benefits of locally delivered alendronate were 38.25% for bone defect fill increase (95% CI=33.05–43.45; P<0.001; I²=94.0%), 2.29 mm for PD reduction (95% CI=2.07–2.52 mm; P<0.001; I²=0.0%) and 1.92 mm for CAL gain (95% CI=1.55–2.30 mm; P<0.001; I²=66.0%). In addition, systemically administered alendronate with SRP significantly reduced PD by 0.36 mm (95% CI=0.18–0.55 mm; P<0.001; I²=0.0%) and increased CAL by 0.39 mm (95% CI=0.11–0.68 mm; P=0.006; I²=6.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The collective evidence regarding the adjunctive use of alendronate locally and systemically with SRP indicates that the combined treatment can improve the efficacy of non-surgical periodontal therapy on increasing CAL and bone defect fill and reducing PD. However, precautions must be exercised in interpreting these results, and multicenter studies evaluating this specific application should be carried out.
Alendronate* ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Periodontitis* ; Population Characteristics ; Root Planing*

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after alendronate intake and to determine the side effects and patient compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred twelve patients with osteoporosis were treated with alendronate. One hundred sixty-two patients were excluded because of early discontinuation. Thus, 50 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The annual increase in BMD in patients taking alendronate was 7.2% (1st year), 3.4%, 2.0%, and 0.9% (4th year) in the L-spine, and 2.2%, 1.5%, -0.9%, and 0.9% in the femur. The changes in BMD of patients< 60 years of age were 2.1% in the L-spine and 3.4% in the femur. The BMD of patients between 60 and 69 years of age increased 6.3% and 0.5% in the L-spine and femur, respectively, and the BMD of patients >70 of age were 2.9% and 1.2% in the L-spine and femur, respectively. The BMD changes in patients with a T-score< -4.0 were 7.0% (L-spine) and 1.2% (femur), the BMD changes in patients with a T-score between -3.0 and -3.9 were 5.3% and 0.2% for the Lspine and femur, respectively, and the BMD changes in patients with a T-score >3.0 were 2.5% and 3.1% for the Lspine and femur, respectively. The reasons for early discontinuation of alendronate were difficulty in intake, economic reasons, and adverse events. CONCLUSION: The BMD changes were greater in the L-spine than the femu in alendronate users. At the first year, the changes in BMD was greatest. There was no significant difference in BMD change according to age. In the Lspine, however, BMD changes were greater in the group with lower T-scores. The early discontinuance rate was 74%, and the adverse events rate was 19.8%.
Alendronate ; Bone Density ; Femur ; Humans ; Osteoporosis ; Patient Compliance

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy alone or in combination with bisphosphonate on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women. METHODS: One hundred three women diagnosed with low BMD in postmenopausal women were included in this study. All patients were classified into two groups; oarl hormone therpy alone (Group I) or with alendronate (Group II), given for 12 months. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD before and after 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: In all groups, significant increase in bone density measurements were seen at 12 months of treatment. The BMD of lumbar spine more increased significantly in Group II than Group I. CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal hormone therapy is effective in osteopenic and osteoporotic women. However, the combined treatment with hormone therapy and bisphophonate is more effective in postmenopausal women with low BMD.
Absorptiometry, Photon ; Alendronate ; Bone Density ; Female ; Humans ; Menopause ; Spine

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of raloxifene and alendronate with those of monotherapies in elderly women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Sixty-two postmenopausal women (mean age 63.5 ± 0.5 years) attending gynecologic osteoporosis clinics with established osteoporosis were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups and monitored for 3 years. All patients enrolled in this study, including those in the control group (n = 14), received 1.0 g elemental calcium and 400 units of vitamin D per day. The raloxifene group (n = 16) received raloxifene 60 mg (Evista®) per day; alendronate group (n = 17) received low-dose (5 mg) alendronate with calcitriol 0.5 µg (Maxmarvil®) per day; and the combination therapy group (n = 15) received both raloxifene 60 mg and low-dose (5 mg) alendronate with calcitriol 0.5 µg. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine and hip before and after 3 years of treatment. RESULTS: In patients who received the combined therapy, BMD increased in the lumbar spine and the hip by 7.2% (P<0.001) and 4.8% (P<0.001) at 3 years. For patients in the alendronate group, the increases were 6.7% (P<0.001) and 3.1% (P<0.01) respectively, for the raloxifene group, the increases were 4.36% (P<0.001) and 1.9% (P<0.05) in the vertebrae and femora, respectively; however, the BMD of patients in the control group decreased by 1.81% (P<0.05) and 1.6% (P<0.05), respectively, after 3 years. Patients who received the combination therapy had significantly higher BMD in both the vertebrae femora (P<0.01) in comparison to that in those treated with raloxifene or alendronate individually. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-year randomized study showed the improved effects of alendronate and raloxifene combination on spine and hip BMD in elderly postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis.
Aged* ; Alendronate* ; Bone Density ; Calcitriol ; Calcium ; Female ; Hip ; Humans ; Osteoporosis* ; Raloxifene Hydrochloride* ; Spine ; Vitamin D

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different administration duration of alendronate on initial wound healing and new bone formation of extraction socket in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen male Sprague-Dawley rats (body weight 130-140 g, 4 weeks old, male) were divided into control group (no alendronate administration) and experimental group (alendronate administration). Experimental group was subdivided into 1 week administrated group, 2 week administrated group, 4 week administrated group and 6 week administrated group according to duration of administration. For the experimental groups, during the designated time period (at the time of extraction, 1 week before extraction, 3 week before extraction and 5 week before extraction) till 1 week after extraction, rats were subcutaneously injected with Alendronate at the dose of 1.0 mg/Kg three times a week. Each specimen from 6 week experimental group and control group were used for microarray analysis, and other specimens were used for histological analysis. The rate of new bone formation within the extraction site and bone loss activity was analyzed using TRAP staining. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis test. (alpha=.05) RESULTS: After one week from the time of extraction, the rate of new bone formation within extraction site for the control group (16.77% +/- 1.36%) compared to the 4 week experimental group (14.99% +/- 6.26%) was lower. However, no statistically significant difference was found. Increase in the number of inactive lacuna (empty lacuna) and decrease in the number of TRAP positive cell were identified with increased duration of administration. There was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed as the duration of Alendronate administration increased the rate of new bone formation decreased with loss of bone activity and reduced number of osteoclast.
Alendronate ; Animals ; Humans ; Male ; Microarray Analysis ; Osteoclasts ; Osteogenesis ; Pilot Projects ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Wound Healing