OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated long-term outcomes of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) plus metformin therapy in terms of control of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial cancer (EC), and post-treatment conception. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients (42 with EC; 21 with AEH) who underwent fertility-sparing management using MPA plus metformin. MPA (400 mg/day) and metformin (750–2,250 mg/day) were administered to achieve complete response (CR). Metformin was administered until conception, even after MPA discontinuation. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 48 (76%) had a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and 43 (68%) showed insulin resistance. Sixty-one patients (97%) achieved CR within 18 months. CR rates at 6, 8–9, and 12 months were 60%, 84%, and 90%, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 57 months (range, 13–115 months), relapse occurred in 8 of 61 patients (13.1%) who had achieved CR. Relapse-free survival (RFS) in all patients at 5 years was 84.8%. Upon univariate analysis, patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m² had significantly better prognoses than did those with BMI <25 kg/m2 (odds ratio=0.19; 95% confidence interval=0.05–0.66; p=0.009). Overall pregnancy and live birth rates per patient were 61% (19/31) and 45% (14/31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MPA plus metformin is efficacious in terms of RFS and post treatment conception. Moreover, metformin may be more efficacious for patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m².
Body Mass Index ; Endometrial Hyperplasia ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; Female ; Fertility Preservation ; Fertilization ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Insulin Resistance ; Live Birth ; Medroxyprogesterone Acetate ; Metformin ; Pregnancy ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the current trends in fertility-sparing (FS) treatment for young atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial cancer (EC) patients in Japan. Methods: This study was conducted by the Committee on Gynecologic Oncology of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) in the 2017–2018 fiscal year. A nationwide, retrospective questionnaire-style survey—as performed. We collected the data of 413 patients from 102 JSOG gynecological cancer registered institutions. Results: FS treatment was performed with medroxyprogesterone (MPA) (87.2%) or MPA + metformin (11.6%). Pathological complete remission (CR) after initial treatment was achieved in 78.2% of patients. The significant clinicopathological factors correlated to CR after initial treatment were histology (AEH vs. endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 [ECG1]), body mass index (BMI) (<25 vs. ≥25 kg/m2), and treatment period (<6 vs. ≥6 months). ECG1, time to complete remission (TTCR) ≥6 months, maintenance therapy (−), and pregnancy (−) were associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence on multivariate analysis. The total pregnancy rate was 47%, and the live birth rate was 40.1%. Patients who received infertility treatments showed a higher live birth rate (50.6%) than those who did not (7.7%). Conclusion In this survey, we confirmed that FS treatment in Japan is centered on MPA alone and in combination with metformin, and that the treatment efficacy is similar to that reported in previous reports. A multicenter survey study in Japan showed FS treatment for young AEH and EC patients in compliance with the indications is feasible.

Objectives: This review aims to introduce preoperative scoring systems to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) and ongoing clinical trials to investigate the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Methods: We summarized previous reports on the preoperative prediction models for LNM and evaluated their validity to omit lymphadenectomy in our recent cohorts. Next, we compared characteristics of two ongoing lymphadenectomy trials (JCOG1412, ECLAT) to examine the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer, and described the details of JCOG1412. Results: Lymphadenectomy has been omitted for 64 endometrial cancer patients who met lowrisk criteria to omit lymphadenectomy using our scoring system (LNM score) and no lymphatic failure has been observed. Other two models also produced comparable results. Two randomized phase III trials to evaluate survival benefit of lymphadenectomy are ongoing for endometrial cancer. JCOG1412 compares pelvic lymphadenectomy alone with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy to evaluate the therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients at risk of LNM. For quality assurance of lymphadenectomy, we defined several regulations, including lower limit of the number of resected nodes, and submission of photos of dissected area to evaluate thoroughness of lymphadenectomy in the protocol. The latest monitoring report showed that the quality of lymphadenectomy has been well-controlled in JCOG1412. Conclusion Our strategy seems reasonable to omit lymphadenectomy and could be generalized in clinical practice. JCOG1412 is a high-quality lymphadenectomy trial in terms of the quality of surgical procedures, which would draw the bona-fide conclusions regarding the therapeutic role of lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.