1.Is repeated high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy permissible for patients with early stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who desire preserving fertility?.
Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Nobuyuki SUSUMU ; Takeshi MAKABE ; Kensuke SAKAI ; Hiroyuki NOMURA ; Fumio KATAOKA ; Akira HIRASAWA ; Kouji BANNO ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2018;29(2):e21-
OBJECTIVE: Reports on the repeated administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for intrauterine recurrence after fertility-preserving therapy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma (G1) are lacking. We aimed to clarify the outcomes of repeated MPA therapy in cases of intrauterine recurrence after fertility-preserving therapy with MPA against AEH/early G1. METHODS: Patients with AEH or stage IA well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma without myometrial invasion who underwent first-line MPA therapy for primary lesions or intrauterine recurrence were divided into initial treatment and repeated treatment groups (162 and 82 patients, respectively). Oral MPA administration (400−600 mg/day) was continued until pathological tumor disappearance. Data regarding clinicopathological factors, adverse events, and outcomes following the initial and repeated hormonal treatments were extracted from medical records and analyzed. RESULTS: Complete response rates in the initial and repeated treatment groups were 98.5% and 96.4%, respectively, among patients with AEH, and were 90.7% and 98.1%, respectively, among patients with G1. In the initial treatment group, 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 53.7% and 33.2% among patients with AEH and G1, respectively. In the repeated treatment group, RFS rates were 14.0% and 11.2% among patients with AEH and G1, respectively. Among patients with AEH, the pregnancy rate tended to be lower in the repeated treatment group than in the initial treatment group (11.1% vs. 29.2%; p=0.107), while no significant group difference was observed among patients with G1 (20.8% vs. 22.7%). CONCLUSION: Repeated treatment is sufficiently effective for intrauterine recurrence after hormonal therapy for AEH/early G1.
Carcinoma, Endometrioid
;
Endometrial Hyperplasia*
;
Endometrial Neoplasms*
;
Female
;
Fertility Preservation
;
Fertility*
;
Hormone Replacement Therapy
;
Humans
;
Medical Records
;
Medroxyprogesterone Acetate*
;
Medroxyprogesterone*
;
Pregnancy Rate
;
Recurrence
2.TP53 variants in p53 signatures and the clonality of STICs in RRSO samples
Tomoko AKAHANE ; Kenta MASUDA ; Akira HIRASAWA ; Yusuke KOBAYASHI ; Arisa UEKI ; Miho KAWAIDA ; Kumiko MISU ; Kohei NAKAMURA ; Shimpei NAGAI ; Tatsuyuki CHIYODA ; Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Shigenori HAYASHI ; Fumio KATAOKA ; Kouji BANNO ; Kokichi SUGANO ; Hajime OKITA ; Kenjiro KOSAKI ; Hiroshi NISHIHARA ; Daisuke AOKI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(4):e50-
Objective:
Precursor lesions may be identified in fallopian tube tissue after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in patients with pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is considered a precursor of high-grade serous carcinoma, whereas the significance of the p53 signature remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the p53 signature and the risk of ovarian cancer.
Methods:
We analyzed the clinicopathological findings and conducted DNA sequencing for TP53 variants of p53 signatures and STIC lesions isolated using laser capture microdissection in 13 patients with pathogenic variants of BRCA1/2 who underwent RRSO and 17 control patients with the benign gynecologic disease.
Results:
TP53 pathogenic variants were detected significantly higher in RRSO group than control (p<0.001). No difference in the frequency of p53 signatures were observed between groups (53.8% vs 29.4%; p=0.17). TP53 sequencing and next-generation sequencing analysis in a patient with STIC and occult cancer revealed 2 TP53 mutations causing different p53 staining for STICs and another TP53 mutation shared between STIC and occult cancer.
Conclusion
The sequence analysis for TP53 revealed 2 types of p53 signatures, one with a risk of progression to STIC and ovarian cancer with pathological variants in TP53 and the other with a low risk of progression without pathological variants in TP53 as seen in control.