1.Distraction Osteogenesis Update: Introduction of Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis.
Akira GOMI ; Ataru SUNAGA ; Hideaki KAMOCHI ; Hirofumi OGUMA ; Yasushi SUGAWARA
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2016;59(3):233-241
In this review, we discuss in detail our current procedure for treating craniosynostosis using multidirectional cranial distraction osteogenesis (MCDO). The MCDO method allows all phenotypes of skull deformity to be reshaped by distraction osteogenesis, except in patients who are 5 months of age or younger and patients with posterior cranial vault problems. We report the results of clinical data of 36 children with craniosynostosis who underwent MCDO between 2005 and 2014 in our institute. This method has the following benefits, such as a high flexibility of reshaping, shorter treatment period and less invasive secondary intervention. We also discuss the other distraction osteogenesis techniques that are used to treat craniosynostosis and compare them with MCDO. The preferred procedure for correction of craniosynostosis may depend on the patient's age, the extent of deformity, and the extent of correction achievable by surgery. We can arrange the combinations of various methods according to the advantage and disadvantage of each technique.
Child
;
Congenital Abnormalities
;
Craniosynostoses
;
Humans
;
Osteogenesis, Distraction*
;
Phenotype
;
Pliability
;
Skull
2.4. Alignment of the 2022 Revision of the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education in Japan with the‘Standards of the National Medical Practitioners Qualifying Examination'
Hiroyuki KOMATSU ; Masanaga YAMAWAKI ; Masatomi IKUSAKA ; Masato ETO ; Yasuhiko KONISHI ; Keiichiro SUZUKI ; Shoichi SHIMADA ; Osamu NOMURA ; Yasushi MATSUYAMA ; Harumi GOMI ; Akira YAMAMOTO ; Takeshi ONOUE ; Hitoshi HASEGAWA ; Hideki TAKAMI ; Hitoaki OKAZAKI
Medical Education 2023;54(2):157-163
In this revision, we have attempted to align the Model Core Curriculum for Medical Education competency, "problem-solving ability based on specialized knowledge," with the "Standards of National Examination for Medical Practitioners." The major diseases and syndromes in "Essential Fundamentals" correspond to the basic diseases in Table 1 of the Core Curriculum, symptoms, physical and laboratory examinations, and treatment in "General Medicine" correspond to the items in Table 2 of the Core Curriculum, and the diseases in "Medical Theory" correspond to the diseases in PS-02 of the Core Curriculum. The validity of the diseases in the Core Curriculum was verified using the evaluation results of the examination level classification of the "Research for Revision of National Examination Criteria." Approximately 690 diseases were conclusively selected. This revision mentions the number of diseases in the Core Curriculum for the first time. Hopefully, this will lead to a deeper examination of diseases that should be studied in medical schools in the future.