Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the United States and worldwide. Though nonalcoholic fatty liver per se may not be independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality, it is associated with a number of harmful metabolic risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, and an unhealthy diet. The fibrosis stage is a predictor of all-cause mortality in NAFLD. Mortality in individuals with NAFLD has been steadily increasing, and the most common cause-specific mortality for NAFLD is cardiovascular disease, followed by extra-hepatic cancer, liver-related mortality, and diabetes. High-risk profiles for mortality in NAFLD include PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism, low thyroid function and hypothyroidism, and sarcopenia. Achieving weight loss through adherence to a high-quality diet and sufficient physical activity is the most important predictor of improvement in NAFLD severity and the benefit of survival. Given the increasing health burden of NAFLD, future studies with more long-term mortality data may demonstrate an independent association between NAFLD and mortality.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease and encompasses a spectrum of pathology from simple steatosis to inflammation and significant fibrosis that leads to cirrhosis. NAFLD and its comorbid conditions extend well beyond the liver. It is a multisystemic clinical disease entity with extrahepatic manifestations such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and psoriasis. Indeed, the most common causes of mortality in subjects with NAFLD are cardiovascular disease, followed by malignancies and then liver-related complications as a distant third. This review focuses on several of the key extrahepatic manifestations of NAFLD and areas for future investigation. Clinicians should learn to screen and initiate treatment for these extrahepatic manifestations in a prompt and timely fashion before they progress to end-organ damage.

Background: Body fat distribution may impact nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and significant fibrosis differently according to race/ethnicity. We determined the relationship between body fat distribution and NAFLD/ significant fibrosis according to race/ethnicity. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 2,395 participants used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 to 2018. NAFLD and significant fibrosis (≥F2) were defined by controlled attenuation parameter scores and liver stiffness measurements on transient elastography, respectively. Visceral and subcutaneous fat volumes were defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD per 1-standard deviation in visceral fat volume and subcutaneous fat volume was 2.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 3.09) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.09) in total population, respectively. Visceral fat in non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest odds for NAFLD (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.45 to 5.62), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.40) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.29) were in order. Significant associations between subcutaneous fat volume (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.29; P=0.003) or visceral fat volume (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.73; P=0.023) and significant fibrosis were noted among individuals with NAFLD. Hispanics had the highest odds for NAFLD-associated significant fibrosis (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.70 per 1-standard deviation in subcutaneous fat volume), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.98) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.01) were in order. Conclusion Visceral adiposity was associated with NAFLD and significant fibrosis despite the association of subcutaneous adiposity in NAFLD and significant fibrosis. Racial/ethnic differences in the association between body fat distribution on NAFLD and significant fibrosis were noted.

Background: Body fat distribution may impact nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and significant fibrosis differently according to race/ethnicity. We determined the relationship between body fat distribution and NAFLD/ significant fibrosis according to race/ethnicity. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 2,395 participants used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 to 2018. NAFLD and significant fibrosis (≥F2) were defined by controlled attenuation parameter scores and liver stiffness measurements on transient elastography, respectively. Visceral and subcutaneous fat volumes were defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD per 1-standard deviation in visceral fat volume and subcutaneous fat volume was 2.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 3.09) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.09) in total population, respectively. Visceral fat in non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest odds for NAFLD (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.45 to 5.62), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.40) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.29) were in order. Significant associations between subcutaneous fat volume (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.29; P=0.003) or visceral fat volume (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.73; P=0.023) and significant fibrosis were noted among individuals with NAFLD. Hispanics had the highest odds for NAFLD-associated significant fibrosis (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.70 per 1-standard deviation in subcutaneous fat volume), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.98) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.01) were in order. Conclusion Visceral adiposity was associated with NAFLD and significant fibrosis despite the association of subcutaneous adiposity in NAFLD and significant fibrosis. Racial/ethnic differences in the association between body fat distribution on NAFLD and significant fibrosis were noted.

Background: Body fat distribution may impact nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and significant fibrosis differently according to race/ethnicity. We determined the relationship between body fat distribution and NAFLD/ significant fibrosis according to race/ethnicity. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 2,395 participants used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 to 2018. NAFLD and significant fibrosis (≥F2) were defined by controlled attenuation parameter scores and liver stiffness measurements on transient elastography, respectively. Visceral and subcutaneous fat volumes were defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: The odds ratio (OR) for NAFLD per 1-standard deviation in visceral fat volume and subcutaneous fat volume was 2.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 3.09) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.04 to 2.09) in total population, respectively. Visceral fat in non-Hispanic Blacks had the highest odds for NAFLD (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.45 to 5.62), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.40) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.29) were in order. Significant associations between subcutaneous fat volume (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.29; P=0.003) or visceral fat volume (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.73; P=0.023) and significant fibrosis were noted among individuals with NAFLD. Hispanics had the highest odds for NAFLD-associated significant fibrosis (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.32 to 5.70 per 1-standard deviation in subcutaneous fat volume), and non-Hispanic Whites (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.98) and non-Hispanic Asians (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.01) were in order. Conclusion Visceral adiposity was associated with NAFLD and significant fibrosis despite the association of subcutaneous adiposity in NAFLD and significant fibrosis. Racial/ethnic differences in the association between body fat distribution on NAFLD and significant fibrosis were noted.

The ongoing obesity epidemic and the increasing recognition of metabolic syndrome have contributed to the growing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common form of liver disease worldwide. It is imperative to understand the incidence and prevalence of NAFLD as it is associated with a profound economic burden of hospitalizations, including the shifting trends in liver transplantation. The long-term cumulative healthcare cost of NAFLD patients has been shown to be 80% higher than that of non-NAFLD patients. We explore diagnostic challenges in identifying those with NAFLD who have a higher predilection to progress to end-stage liver disease. We aim to assess all-cause and cause-specific mortality as it relates to NAFLD.