Background: The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups. Results: Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups. Conclusions Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure.Level of evidence: IV.

Background: The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups. Results: Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups. Conclusions Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure.Level of evidence: IV.

Background: The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups. Results: Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups. Conclusions Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure.Level of evidence: IV.

Background: The popularity of the Latarjet procedure (LP) for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability continues to rise. However, LP is technically demanding and associated with complications. This study aims to determine the learning curve for the open LP (oLP) and the threshold for proficiency. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all oLPs performed by a single surgeon in a single institution from 2016 to 2021. Operative time, defined as time from incision to closure, was the primary outcome of this study, and 1-year postoperative complications were the secondary outcome. After listing oLP cases in chronological order, they were classified into groups of 15, and the average operative time for each group was determined. Demographics, operative duration, and postoperative complications were compared across groups. Results: Seventy-five oLPs were included in this study, and operative times decreased after the first 15 procedures. While operative times continued to decrease with increasing case number, the learning curve began to plateau after 30 procedures. After 75 procedures, there was a total decrease in average operative time of 31.5 minutes relative to that of the first 15 cases. There were no differences in complication or revision rates among procedure groups. Conclusions Establishing learning curves provides important insight into the complexity of surgical procedures. Our study demonstrates that the oLP has a steep learning curve with significant improvement in operative time after the first 15 cases. Operative time plateaus after 30 cases, indicating proficiency in this procedure.Level of evidence: IV.

This study compares the outcomes of Latarjet-Patte procedures (LPs) performed for primary glenohumeral instability in the setting of critical bone loss (LP-BL) versus salvage surgery performed after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair (LP-FB). Methods: LP’s performed by senior author from 2017 to 2021 were separated into cohorts by LP indication. Data abstracted from electronic medical records included demographic information, preoperative clinical scores, radiological imaging, and complications. Postoperative clinical outcome scores collected after a 2-year minimum follow-up included: patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE), PROMIS pain interference, PROMIS pain intensity, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale pain scores. Results: A total of 47 patients (LP-BL: n=29, LP-FB: n=18) with a mean age of 29 years (range, 15–58 years) were included in this study. Both cohorts achieved good upper extremity functionality without significant differences as indicated by mean PROMIS UE (LP-BL: 52.6±10.0 vs. LP-FB: 54.6±7.6, P=0.442) and ASES score (LP-BL: 89.9±15.7 vs. LP-FB: 91.5±14.4, P=0.712). However, the LP-FB cohort reported lower levels of pain (LP-FB: 0.5±1.1 vs. LP-BL: 1.9±2.7, P=0.020) at their latest follow-up. There were no significant differences in complication rates including re-dislocation between cohorts (LP-BL: 2/29 [6.9%] vs. LP-FB: 2/18 [11.1%], P=0.629). Conclusions: When performed after failed Bankart repair, the LP results in similar postoperative functional outcomes and similar rates of complications and re-dislocations when compared to the primary indication of recurrent glenohumeral instability in the setting of critical bone loss. Level of evidence: III.