Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.

Purpose: To assess the prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic immune-inflammation response index (SIRI) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Materials and Methods: One hundred seven patients were retrospectively enrolled. Chi-square (χ 2 ) tests were adopted to assess the association of the inflammatory ratios and indexes to clinical risk factors. Overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local, lymph node, and contralateral recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and the corresponding curves were compared using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis were performed using general linear models to identify risk factors for prognosis. Results: NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI were predictive of OS (p=0.024, p=0.025, p=0.004, p=0.006, and p=0.03, respectively). Besides, PLR was predictive of local (p<0.001) and lymph node RFS (p=0.014) and SII was associated to lymph node and contralateral RFS prediction (p=0.034 and p=0.023, respectively). All candidate markers adding high NLR+high MLR+high PLR combination were independent risk factors of OS. PLR was an independent risk factor of local and lymph node RFS whereas the above cited combination and NLR were independent prognosticators of local and contralateral RFS respectively. All markers were correlated to poor postoperative clinical characteristics mainly pathological grade (p<0.05). Conclusions Preoperative NLR, MLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI were associated with higher pathologic features and worse oncological outcomes in patients treated with RNU for UTUC.