1.Intraoperative discomfort associated with the use of a rotary or reciprocating system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Aline Cristine GOMES ; Adriana Jesus SOARES ; Erick M SOUZA ; Alexandre Augusto ZAIA ; Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal SILVA
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2017;42(2):140-145
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical study was to evaluate patients' intraoperative discomfort during root canal preparations in which either multi-file rotary (Mtwo) or single-file reciprocating (Reciproc) systems were used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five adult patients, aged between 25 and 69 years old, with irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis participated in this study. Either the mesiobuccal or the distobuccal canals for maxillary molars and either the mesiobuccal or the mesiolingual canals for mandibular molars were randomly chosen to be instrumented with Mtwo multi-file rotary or Reciproc single-file reciprocating systems. Immediately after each canal instrumentation under anesthesia, patient discomfort was assessed using a 1 - 10 visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from ‘least possible discomfort’ (1) to ‘greatest possible discomfort’ (10). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine significant differences at p< 0.05. RESULTS: Little intraoperative discomfort was found in all cases. No statistically significant differences in intraoperative discomfort between the 2 systems were found (p = 0.660). CONCLUSIONS: Root canal preparation with multi-file rotary or single-file reciprocating systems had similar and minimal effects on patients' intraoperative discomfort.
Adult
;
Anesthesia
;
Clinical Study
;
Dental Pulp Necrosis
;
Endodontics
;
Humans
;
Molar
;
Prospective Studies*
;
Pulpitis
;
Root Canal Preparation
;
Visual Analog Scale
2.Effect of intracanal medications on the interfacial properties of reparative cements
Andrea Cardoso PEREIRA ; Mariana Valerio PALLONE ; Marina Angélica MARCIANO ; Karine Laura CORTELLAZZI ; Marcos FROZONI ; Brenda P F A GOMES ; José Flávio Affonso de ALMEIDA ; Adriana de Jesus SOARES
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2019;44(2):e21-
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of calcium hydroxide with 2% chlorhexidine gel (HCX) or distilled water (HCA) compared to triple antibiotic paste (TAP) on push-out bond strength and the cement/dentin interface in canals sealed with White MTA Angelus (WMTA) or Biodentine (BD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 extracted human lower premolars were endodontically prepared and randomly divided into 4 groups according to the intracanal medication, as follows: group 1, HCX; group 2, TAP; group 3, HCA; and group 4, control (without intracanal medication). After 7 days, the medications were removed and the cervical third of the specimens was sectioned into five 1-mm sections. The sections were then sealed with WMTA or BD as a reparative material. After 7 days in 100% humidity, a push-out bond strength test was performed. Elemental analysis was performed at the interface, using energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The data were statistically analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: BD presented a higher bond strength than WMTA (p < 0.05). BD or WMTA in canals treated with calcium hydroxide intracanal medications had the highest bond strength values, with a statistically significant difference compared to TAP in the WMTA group (p < 0.05). There were small amounts of phosphorus in samples exposed to triple antibiotic paste, regardless of the coronal sealing. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intracanal medications did not affect the bond strength of WMTA and BD, except when TAP was used with WMTA.
Bicuspid
;
Calcium Hydroxide
;
Chlorhexidine
;
Endodontics
;
Humans
;
Humidity
;
Pemetrexed
;
Phosphorus
;
Spectrum Analysis
;
Water