Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common senile disease, and its main clinical manifestation is lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS), which has long been afflicting old male patients. Previous study showed that alpha1-receptor in the prostate was involved in the development of LUTS. At present, alpha1-receptor blocker is generally accepted as a choice drug for treating BPH and relieving LUTS. The article reviews the tissue distribution of alpha1-receptor and clinical application of alpha1-receptor blocker.
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; pharmacokinetics ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1 ; analysis

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Naftopidil tablet in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODSEighty BPH patients were divided into two groups randomly by double-blind, double-simulated and active control parallel study trials. Forty patients in treatment group were given Naftopidil tablet 25 mg, p.o., qn for 42 days, while 40 patients in control group were given Tamsulosin 0.2 mg, p.o., qn for 42 days. Statistical analysis was given from 77 cases in the groups. Estimation of the efficacy was done by the change of major indexes include international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flowrate (Qmax) and secondary indexes such as quality of life (QOL), residual urine (Ru) and volume of prostate (V).

RESULTSThe changes of IPSS, Qmax, QOL had significant difference between two groups before and after treatment(P < 0.05). The change of Ru had no significant difference between two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05) while there was significant difference between two groups after six-week treatment(P < 0.05). The change of V had no significant difference (P > 0.05). The adverse reactions in both groups were mild, and there was no significant difference between two groups(P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSNaftopidil tablet was safe and effective in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Double-Blind Method ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Naphthalenes ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Piperazines ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; psychology ; Quality of Life ; Tablets

The epidemiological survey shows that primary hypertension is one of the independent risk factors in the development and the progress of BPH, 25 percent of old male patients aged 60 or more suffer from the two diseases at the same time, which grievously affects their quality of life. There is little literature about the appropriate therapeutic regimen of BPH associated hypertension. The article reviews the progress in the studies of alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker for BPH associated hypertension, and explores the main problems facing us and ventures the prospects for the development in this field.
Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Humans ; Hypertension ; complications ; drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prazosin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; complications ; drug therapy

ObjectiveTo investigate the therapeutic effects of commonly used selective &alpha;-adrenergic receptor antagonists (&alpha;-ARA) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODSPubMed, Embase and CNKI databases were searched for the literature about selective &alpha;-ARAs for the treatment of BPH and the information was extracted on the common adverse reactions in the course of treatment. Multivariate meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the therapeutic effects of different &alpha;-ARAs.

RESULTSThe total rates of adverse effects of silodosin and tamsulosin were the highest, 51.9% and 34.0% respectively, with the highest incidences of headache (38.3%), weakness (23.6%) and dizziness (17.5%). Besides, tamsulosin ranked the first in inducing sexual dysfunction of the male patients with BPH (70.4%).

CONCLUSIONSDoxazosin is preferable as the first-choice treatment of BPH for its therapeutic effect and improvement of the patient's quality of life. Silodosin and tamsulosin, however, can be selectively used according to the patient's specific tolerance to different adverse effects.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Doxazosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Humans ; Indoles ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Male ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; Quality of Life ; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological ; chemically induced ; Tamsulosin ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUNDTamsulosin hydrochloride can significantly improve benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms after the first dose and achieve long-term efficacy in European and American populations; however, the corresponding studies from China are rarely seen. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg once daily in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of BPH in China.

METHODSChinese patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH were enrolled in a 4-week placebo run-in period and subsequent 60-week open-label study. Tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.2 mg was administered daily during the period of the study. The efficacy and safety parameters were evaluated at the end of treatment period I (0 - 12 weeks) and period II (13 - 60 weeks). The BPH patients were divided into tamsulosin monotherapy group and combination therapy group which received concomitant medication of finasteride 5 mg once daily after the evaluation at the end of treatment period I.

RESULTSA total of 113 patients were recruited to the study. Eighty-two patients received tamsulosin monotherapy and twenty-nine received combination therapy during the treatment period II. Tamsulosin hydrochloride produced a great improvement in mean maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) (1.7 ml/s, 3 ml/s) and a significant decrease in mean international prostate symptom score (IPSS) (4.1, 6.4) after 12-week and 60-week treatments, respectively. At the end of treatment period II, there were significant improvement in IPSS, quality of life (QOL) score, Q(max) and average flow rate (Q(ave)) for combination therapy group compared with the treatment period I (all P < 0.05). No serious adverse events (SAE) were recorded during the study.

CONCLUSIONLong-term tamsulosin hydrochloride therapy is a safe, effective and well-tolerated method for the treatment for LUTS suggestive of BPH in China.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Aged ; China ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Placebos ; Prostatic Hyperplasia ; drug therapy ; Prostatism ; drug therapy ; Sulfonamides ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use

We evaluated the therapeutic effects of tamsulosin for women with non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction. Women who had voiding dysfunctions for at least 3 months were included. Inclusion criteria were age > or =18 yr, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of > or =15, and maximum flow rate (Q(max)) of > or =12 mL/sec and/or postvoid residuals (PVR) of > or =150 mL. Patients with neurogenic voiding dysfunction or anatomical bladder outlet obstruction were excluded. All patients were classified according to the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram as having no or mild obstruction (group A) or moderate or severe obstruction (group B). After 8 weeks of treatment, treatment outcomes and adverse effects were evaluated. One hundred and six patients were evaluable (70 in group A, 36 in group B). After treatments, mean IPSS, bother scores, Q(max), PVR, diurnal and nocturnal micturition frequencies and scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire (BFLUTS-SF) were changed significantly. Eighty-nine patients (84%) reported that the treatment was beneficial. The proportion of patients reported that their bladder symptoms caused "moderate to many severe problems" were significantly decreased. No significant difference were observed between the groups in terms of IPSS, bother score, Q(max), PVR, micturition frequency, and BFLUTS-SF changes. Adverse effects related to medication were dizziness (n=3), de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) (n=3), aggravation of underlying SUI (n=1), fatigue (n=1). Tamsulosin was found to be effective in female patients with voiding dysfunction regardless of obstruction grade.
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects/pharmacokinetics/*therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Questionnaires ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sulfonamides/adverse effects/pharmacokinetics/*therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Urination Disorders/*drug therapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect and investigate the putative mechanism of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) applied to the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A total of 52 patients with symptomatic BPH were evaluated. Transperineal intraprostatic injection under transrectal ultrasonography was carried out. BTA dissolved in 4 to 9 mL of saline was used from 100 U to 300 U, according to prostate volume. Twenty-six patients received only BTA (BT group), and 26 received both BTA and one month of an alpha-adrenergic antagonist (BTalpha group). The therapeutic outcomes were evaluated by comparing parameters such as international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, post-void residual urine, and peak urinary flow rate. At the one month follow- up, 18 patients in the BT group and 21 in the BTalpha group had subjective symptomatic relief (p = 0.337). Only IPSS5 (weak stream) was significantly different between the BT group and BTalpha groups (p = 0.034). At the three month follow-up, 39 patients had subjective symptomatic relief. The storage symptoms were improved more than the voiding symptoms. Additionally, about 50 percent of the patients whose voiding symptom improved expressed improved erectile function. BTA injection seems to be an alternative treatment for BPH. The differences after the one month evaluation between the BT and the BTalpha groups might suggest that the adrenergic influence could be relatively reinforced by the anticholinergic effect of BTA. Nitric oxide would thus be involved in a BTA action mechanism in BPH.
Sulfonamides/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Prostatic Hyperplasia/*drug therapy ; Neuromuscular Agents/*therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Humans ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Doxazosin/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Botulinum Toxin Type A/adverse effects/*therapeutic use ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aged ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects/therapeutic use

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate a new effective treatment for prostatodynia (PD) and chronic non-bacterial prostatitis (CNP).

METHODSOne hundred and thirty-six patients suffered from PD or CNP were divided randomly into experiment group (n = 76), which were treated with external RF hyperthermia (ERFH) combining with alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blocker Terazosin for 12 weeks, and control group (n = 60), which were only treated with ERFH. Symptoms scores, urodynamic indexes and expressed prostate secretion were recorded pre- and post-treatments.

RESULTSMFR and AFR were significantly improved and symptoms scores significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). The efficacy was better in experiment group than that in control group. The combination treatment also led to a significantly decrease in MUP and MUCP (P < 0.05). Additionally, the leucocytes in expressed prostate secretion were also reduced in experiment group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSTreatment of ERFH combining with alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blocker for patients with PD or CNP was effective and had little side-effect, while the future curative effect should be observed furtherly.

Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists ; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists ; adverse effects ; therapeutic use ; Adult ; Chronic Disease ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Humans ; Hyperthermia, Induced ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; drug therapy ; etiology ; Pain Management ; Prazosin ; adverse effects ; analogs & derivatives ; therapeutic use ; Prostatitis ; complications ; drug therapy ; therapy

PURPOSE: We determined the efficacy and safety of a relatively high dose of terazosin (5mg) in Korean patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with or without concomitant hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July to December 2006, 200 men who consecutively presented with LUTS were prospectively studied. Eight weeks after treatment, blood pressure (BP), uroflowmetry, and International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) were assessed. For analysis purposes, patients were stratified according to concomitant hypertension. Of the 200 patients, 173 completed the scheduled eight-week treatment period. RESULTS: At baseline, no differences were evident in the two groups in terms of I-PSS, Qmax, PVR and BP. After eight weeks of treatment-although I-PSS and uroflowmetry parameters were not significantly different in the two groups-systolic and diastolic BP in the non-hypertensive control group were higher than in the hypertensive group (p= 0.001 and p=0.0100, respectively). Changes in I-PSS, uroflowmetry parameters, and BPs measured at week eight post- treatment commencement did not significantly differ between the two groups. Moreover, the addition of 5mg of terazosin to antihypertensives did not cause a significant reduction in either systolic or diastolic BP in either group. CONCLUSION: Adding terazosin to existing antihypertensive regimens did not seem to increase the incidence of adverse events. Our findings suggest that 5mg terazosin is effective and that it has an acceptable safety profile as an add-on therapy for patients with LUTS and concomitant hypertension.
Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/adverse effects/therapeutic use ; Aged ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Blood Pressure/drug effects ; Humans ; Hypertension/complications/*drug therapy/physiopathology ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prazosin/adverse effects/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate/drug effects/pathology ; Treatment Outcome ; Urodynamics/drug effects ; Urologic Diseases/complications/*drug therapy/ethnology