Objective: To determine the effect of a single intravenous dose of tranexamic acid on intraoperative bleeding, duration of surgery and surgical field visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery. Methods: Study Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary Government Hospital in Quezon City Participants: 10 patients aged 18-75 years old diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis and unresponsive to medical treatment, who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery from September 2016 to August 2017, were randomly allocated to treatment group and control group respectively. The “odd” numbers were assigned to the treatment group (intravenous Tranexamic acid) given 1 dose of 100mg/ml (500mg tranexamic acid per 5 ml) tranexamic acid slow intravenous drip 1 hour prior to the procedure, while the “even” numbers assigned to the control group received the same amount of normal saline solution. Results: The mean duration of surgery of the tranexamic group was 185 minutes (standard deviation, SD 55.23) and the control group was 122.6 minutes (SD 42.03) showing no significant difference (p=.08). The mean blood loss of the tranexamic group was less at 240ml (SD 108.39) compared with the control group at 290ml (SD 74.16), although there was no statistically significant difference (p=.42). Intraoperative surgical field assessed by the surgeon based on the Boezart grading scale showed that 2 (40%) of the tranexamic group had higher bleeding score compared with the placebo group. However, this was not found to be statistically significant (p=.460). Due to the small sample size, a type II error occurred with alpha level of 0.05 and estimated power of 0.0885, with not enough basis to refute that a single dose of intravenous tranexamic acid has no effect in improving surgical field visualization during endoscopic sinus surgery. No drug side effects were noted after administration until after surgery. Conclusion Single dose intravenous tranexamic acid in functional endoscopic sinus surgery decreased mean intraoperative blood loss (but this was statistically insignificant), but its effect on surgical field visualization cannot totally be assessed due to small sample size. There was also no change in the observed duration of surgery. No untoward side effects associated were noted from administration of the drug until after the surgery finished.
Administration, Intravenous ; Tranexamic Acid ; Sinusitis

Vancomycin is a bacteriocidal antibiotic experiencing a resurgence of utility because of increasing clinical problems with methicillinresistant staphylcoccal infections. Vancomycin can cause two types of hypersensitivity reactions, the red man syndrome and anaphylaxis. There is a consensus that slow intravenous administration of vancomycin should minimize the risk of infusion related adverse effects. We report a case of vancomycin hypersensitivity reaction with slow infusion of vancomycin.
Administration, Intravenous ; Anaphylaxis ; Consensus ; Hypersensitivity ; Vancomycin

No abstract available.
Administration, Intravenous* ; Cervix Uteri* ; Cisplatin* ; Female ; Fluorouracil*

No abstract available.
Administration, Intravenous* ; Nimodipine* ; Rabbits* ; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage*

No abstract available.
Aged ; Administration, Intravenous* ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled* ; Humans

BACKGROUND: The worldwide incidence of osteomyelitis is approximately 21.8 cases per 100,000 person-years. The cornerstone of treatment is prolonged (4-6 weeks) intravenous antibiotic administration. This entails additional cost, inconvenience, and added manpower from the healthcare system. Thus, studies have explored the possible use of oral antibiotics as alternatives to improve patient compliance and reduce costs. Our meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in treating adult patients with osteomyelitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and Research Gate) from 1966 to April 2020 were searched using the terms “oral antibiotics”, “osteomyelitis”, “randomized controlled trial”. Only studies that directly compared oral versus intravenous antibiotics and confirmed osteomyelitis through biopsy and/or imaging were included. Primary outcome is remission (resolution of symptoms with no relapse and bacteriologic eradication); secondary outcomes, (a) relapse (persistence of the pathogen after treatment) and (b) adverse events. The validity of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We performed a random-effects model in Review Manager Version 5.3 with 95% confidence interval. The I 2 test was used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Seven of 89 trials comprised of 1,282 patients were included in the final analysis. All studies included patients with osteomyelitis of the lower extremities. Oral antibiotics used were Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, and Co-trimoxazole; intravenous antibiotics used were deemed appropriate by the infectious disease specialist. Patients were only given either oral or intravenous antibiotics. Results showed an 8% increase in remission rates [RR 1.08 (0.81 to 1.44, 95% CI, Z = 0.52, p=0.60)] with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) in the intravenous antibiotics group. However, this was not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was a 62% decrease in relapse rates in the intravenous antibiotics group [RR 1.62 (0.85 to 3.07, 95% CI, Z = 1.47, p = 0.14)] with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) but was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Oral are comparable to intravenous antibiotics in treating osteomyelitis in terms of remission and relapse rates. However, larger and double-blinded trials should be done to generate more robust data to validate these claims.
Osteomyelitis ; Administration, Intravenous ' ; Parenteral Nutrition

This paper present a microcontroller system for target controlled infusion according to pharmacodynamic parameters of intravenous anesthetics. It can control the depth of anesthesia by adjusting the level of plasma concentrations. The system has the advantages of high precision, extended function and easy operation. It has been now used in the clinical anesthesia.
Algorithms ; Anesthesia, Intravenous ; instrumentation ; methods ; Anesthetics, Intravenous ; administration & dosage ; pharmacokinetics ; Computer Systems ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Microcomputers ; Software Design

BACKGROUND: Intravenous injection of rocuronium is associated with withdrawal responses which are attributable to the pain from the injection of rocuronium. Several methods have been proposed to abolish and attenuate rocuronium-induced pain. We hypothesized priming dose of rocuronium could reduce withdrawal responses associated with administering a second large dose of rocuronium for tracheal intubation. We compared the efficacy of the priming dose technique of rocuronium with intravenous lidocaine as a pre-treatment for the prevention of withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection. METHODS: We recruited 150 patients aged between 18 and 60 years, ASA physical status 1 or 2, who were going to undergo elective surgery requiring general anesthesia. Patients were allocated into three groups. Group C received normal saline, Group L received lidocaine 1 mg/kg, and Group P received rocuronium 0.06 mg/kg 2 minutes before administering a second large dose of rocuronium for tracheal intubation. After the loss of consciousness, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 10 seconds for tracheal intubation. The withdrawal responses to the injection of rocuronium were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection for tracheal intubation was 56, 50, 24% in group C, group L, and group P, respectively. The incidence of withdrawal responses was lower in group P than group C and group L, but there was no difference between group L and group C. CONCLUSIONS: Priming dose technique is a useful clinical method to alleviate withdrawal responses associated with rocuronium injection.
Administration, Intravenous ; Aged ; Androstanols ; Anesthesia, General ; Humans ; Incidence ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intubation ; Lidocaine ; Unconsciousness

PURPOSE: Knee IVIR images were repeatedly obtained after intravenous administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine to evaluate the arthrographic effect and to determine the optimal scan timing and technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sagittal Tl-weighted (650/15) sequences were repeated before and after intravenous gadolinium enhancement in 26 patients who were divided into exercise (14/26) and nonexercise (12/26) groups. Fourteen patients in exercise group were allowed to move the affected knee joint actively for 10 minutes immediately after the first post-enhancement scan and before repeating scans. The signal intensities in central and peripheral portions of the joint were measured and compared between these two groups. RESULTS: In all cases, enhancement of joint fluid began at peripheral portion and progressed toward central portion. The diffusion rate in exercise group was far faster than that in nonexercise group and homogeneous arthrographic image was revealed within 10 minutes after completion of joint movement. The arthrographic effect continued and the rate of signal decrease was quite slow. CONCLUSION: MR arthrographic image of knee joint can be obtained within 10 minutes after completion of a few minute exercise following intravenous injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Intravenous MR arthrography is expected to become an useful method as a convenient alternative to direct MR arthrography.
Administration, Intravenous ; Arthrography* ; Diffusion ; Gadolinium ; Gadolinium DTPA ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Joints ; Knee Joint ; Knee*

Succinylcholine has been reported to cause elevation of intraocular pressure(IOP.) IOP measurements, following single and mixed intravenous administration of succinylcholine and pancuronium, given immediately after thiopental, were made in 40 surgical patients, to assess the effect of pacuronium on the succinylcholine induced increase in IOP. The major findings of this study were as follows; 1) Tbiopental showed significant lowering effect on IOP. 2) A single intravenous injection of succinylcholine(1mg/kg) caused a slight rise of lOP. 3) A single intravenous injection of pancuronium(4mg) caused a slight decrease of IOP. 4) A mixed intravenous injection of succinylcholine and pancuronium increased the IOP more significantly than succinylcholine alone, This also means that pancuronium do not inhibit succinylcholine induced increase In IOP. 5) Tracheal intubation caused a rise of IOP significantly.
Administration, Intravenous* ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Intraocular Pressure* ; Intubation ; Pancuronium* ; Succinylcholine* ; Thiopental