Adenocarcinoma ; diagnosis ; secondary ; surgery ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Cystoscopy ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; surgery ; Radiography ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate ; methods ; Ureteral Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; secondary ; surgery ; Ureteroscopy ; Urethral Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; secondary ; surgery ; Urothelium ; pathology

Metastasis to the primary thyroid carcinoma is extremely rare. We report here a case of colonic adenocarcinoma metastasis to medullary thyroid carcinoma in a 53-yr old man with a history of colon cancer. He showed a nodular lesion, suggesting malignancy in the thyroid gland, in a follow-up examination after colon cancer surgery. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the thyroid gland showed tumor cell clusters, which was suspected to be medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). The patient underwent a total thyroidectomy. Using several specific immunohistochemical stains, the patient was diagnosed with colonic adenocarcinoma metastasis to MTC. To the best of our knowledge, the present patient is the first case of colonic adenocarcinoma metastasizing to MTC. Although tumor-tumor metastasis to primary thyroid carcinoma is very rare, we still should consider metastasis to the thyroid gland, when a patient with a history of other malignancy presents with a new thyroid finding.
Adenocarcinoma/pathology/surgery ; Biopsy, Fine-Needle ; Carcinoma, Medullary/diagnosis/radiography/*secondary ; Colonic Neoplasms/*pathology/surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Second Primary/*diagnosis ; Thyroid Gland/pathology ; Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis/radiography/*secondary ; Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.
Adenocarcinoma/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen/blood ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; False Negative Reactions ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms/*diagnosis/radiography/*secondary/surgery ; *Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Rectal Neoplasms/*pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Analysis ; *Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Markers, Biological/blood