Huangtu Decoction, first recorded in Essentials from the Golden Cabinet(Jin Kui Yao Lue) from ZHANG Zhong-jing in Han dynasty, is used to treat distal bleeding. It is mainly treated for the syndrome of failing to control blood with spleen-yang deficiency. The connotation of distal bleeding is more extensive, including not only upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the traditional sense such as peptic ulcer bleeding, gastrointestinal tumors, gastric mucosal lesions, vascular dysplasia, esophagogastric variceal bleeding, and pancreatic and biliary tract injury, but also other anorectal diseases such as part colon and rectal cancer swelling or polyps, hemorrhoids, and anal fissure and other parts of bleeding such as epistaxis, thrombocytopenia, functional uterine bleeding, threatened abortion, and unexplained hematuria. Distal bleeding also involves syndromes of failing to keep part deficient and cold fluids in interior, such as nocturia, enuresis, clear nose, sweating, cold tears, and leucorrhea, and excessive gastrointestinal bleeding caused by anti-plate and anticoagulant drugs, unexplained positive in the fecal occult blood test, and other modern clinical new problems. The indications of Huangtu Decoction include not only lower blood, defecation before blood, distant blood, hematemesis, epistaxis, and other diseases in traditional Chinese medicine, but also three types of clinical manifestations including bleeding, deficiency syndrome, and stagnant heat syndrome. In the clinic, Huangtu Decoction can be used to treat acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, acute coronary syndrome complicated with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding events caused by excessive antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, unexplained positive in the fecal occult blood test, gastrointestinal tumor with bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and other acute and critical diseases. The dosage of Cooking Stove Earthkey, Rehmanniae Radix, and Asini Corii Colla in Huangtu Decoction is the key to hemostasis.
Humans ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy* ; Acute Coronary Syndrome ; Epistaxis ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices ; Anticoagulants ; Thrombocytopenia ; Critical Care

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is one of the leading causes of death in cardiovascular disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important method for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD), and it has greatly reduced the mortality of ACS patients since its application. However, a series of new problems may occur after PCI, such as in-stent restenosis, no-reflow phenomenon, in-stent neoatherosclerosis, late stent thrombosis, myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, which result in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that seriously reduce the postoperative benefit for patients. The inflammatory response is a key mechanism of MACE after PCI. Therefore, examining effective anti-inflammatory therapies after PCI in patients with ACS is a current research focus to reduce the incidence of MACE. The pharmacological mechanism and clinical efficacy of routine Western medicine treatment for the anti-inflammatory treatment of CHD have been verified. Many Chinese medicine (CM) preparations have been widely used in the treatment of CHD. Basic and clinical studies showed that effectiveness of the combination of CM and Western medicine treatments in reducing incidence of MACE after PCI was better than Western medicine treatment alone. The current paper reviewed the potential mechanism of the inflammatory response and occurrence of MACE after PCI in patients with ACS and the research progress of combined Chinese and Western medicine treatments in reducing incidence of MACE. The results provide a theoretical basis for further research and clinical treatment.
Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods* ; Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Coronary Disease ; Treatment Outcome ; Stents/adverse effects*

Objective: For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), both anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy should be applied, but the use of anticoagulation therapy is still poor in these patients in China. The purpose of this study was to explore the status and adherence of antithrombotic therapy in AF patients with ACS and the impact on 1 year clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with AF hospitalized for ACS were retrospectively included from 6 tertiary hospitals in China between July 2015 and December 2020. According to the use of anticoagulant drugs at discharge, patients were divided into two groups: anticoagulant treatment group and non-anticoagulant treatment group. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the main factors influencing the use of anticoagulant drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation complicated with ACS. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 bleeding events were also collected at 1 year after discharge. After propensity score matching, Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate the effect of anticoagulant treatment and non-anticoagulant treatment on 1-year prognosis. The patients were divided into different groups according to whether anticoagulation was performed at discharge and follow-up, and the sensitivity of the results was analyzed. Results: A total of 664 patients were enrolled, and 273 (41.1%) were treated with anticoagulant therapy, of whom 84 (30.8%) received triple antithrombotic therapy, 91 (33.3%) received double antithrombotic therapy (single antiplatelet combined with anticoagulant), and 98 (35.9%) received single anticoagulant therapy. Three hundred and ninety-one (58.9%) patients were treated with antiplatelet therapy, including 253 (64.7%) with dual antiplatelet therapy and 138 (35.3%) with single antiplatelet therapy. After 1∶1 propensity score matching between the anticoagulant group and the non-anticoagulant group, a total of 218 pairs were matched. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that history of diabetes, HAS-BLED score≥3, and percutaneous coronary intervention were predictors of the absence of anticoagulant therapy, while history of ischemic stroke and persistent atrial fibrillation were predictors of anticoagulant therapy. At 1-year follow-up, 218 patients (79.9%) in the anticoagulant group continued to receive anticoagulant therapy, and 333 patients (85.2%) in the antiplatelet group continued to receive antiplatelet therapy. At 1-year follow-up, 36 MACEs events (13.2%) occurred in the anticoagulant group, and 81 MACEs events (20.7%) in the non-anticoagulant group. HR values and confidence intervals were calculated by Cox proportional risk model. Patients in the non-anticoagulant group faced a higher risk of MACEs (HR=1.802, 95%CI 1.112-2.921, P=0.017), and the risk of bleeding events was similar between the two group (HR=0.825,95%CI 0.397-1.715, P=0.607). Conclusions: History of diabetes, HAS-BLED score≥3, and percutaneous coronary intervention are independent factors for the absence of anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF complicated with ACS. The incidence of MACEs, death and myocardial infarction is lower in the anticoagulant group, and the incidence of bleeding events is similar between the two groups. The risk of bleeding and ischemia/thrombosis should be dynamically assessed during follow-up and antithrombotic regiments should be adjusted accordingly.
Humans ; Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy* ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects* ; Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Anticoagulants ; Myocardial Infarction/complications* ; Hemorrhage ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy* ; Stroke

Objective: To assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and use of lipid-lowering treatment among young and middle-aged ultra-high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in China. Methods: The study was based on the"Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC)-ACS"project, a collaborative registry by and Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) and the American Heart Association. Hospitalized-patients with ACS were consecutively enrolled from 159 tertiary and 82 secondary hospitals across China, related clinical information was collected. This study included young and middle-aged hospitalized patients (18-59 years) with ACS from November 2014 to December 2019 registered in CCC-ACS project. Ultra-high-risk was defined according to Chinese expert consensus on lipid management of ultra-high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients of CSC. The mean LDL-C levels at admission, pre-hospital lipid-lowering therapy and proportion of patients with LDL-C target achieved were analyzed. Results: A total of 42 230 patients younger than 60 years with ACS were included in this study. The mean age was (50.4±6.9) years, and 86.8% (36 676/42 230) of the ACS patients were male. Among them, 86.9% (36 687/42 230) met the criteria of ultra-high-risk. The mean level of LDL-C at admission was (2.8±1.0)mmol/L, only 5.3 % (1 948/36 687) patients achieved the targeted goal of LDL-C<1.4 mmol/L. Among the ultra-high-risk ASCVD patients, 17.5% (6 430/36 687) received lipid-lowering drugs before hospitalization, 96.4% (6 198/6 430) of whom received statins monotherapy. Among patients receiving pre-hospital statins, only 9.9% (626/6 323) patients reached an LDL-C<1.4 mmol/L at admission. Conclusions: The majority of young and middle-aged hospitalized patients with ACS are ultra-high-risk patients for ASCVD in China. Pre-hospital lipid-lowering drugs use is lower in these ultra-high-risk ASCVD patients and most patients do not reach the new LDL-C target level at admission.
Middle Aged ; United States ; Humans ; Male ; Adult ; Female ; Cholesterol, LDL ; Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; China ; Atherosclerosis/drug therapy* ; Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use*

Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Anticoagulants/therapeutic use* ; Coronary Disease/drug therapy* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use*

Objective: To explore the medication compliance for secondary prevention drugs and long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between hospitals in different regions of China. Methods: The Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy for Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (OPT-CAD) study was a prospective, multi-center and registered study. Patients diagnosed as ACS and underwent PCI in OPT-CAD study were selected. Taking the Yangtze River as the dividing line between the south and the north of China, these patients were divided into two groups according to the hospitals where the patients visited, namely the southerns region group (n=1 958) and the northerns region group (n=5 091). In order to reduce selection bias and potential confounding factors, the patients in the two groups were matched by the tendency score, and the patients in the two groups were matched by the 1: 1 nearest match method according to the tendency score. The main endpoint of this study was the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) occurring within 5 years after discharge, namely the composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and/or ischemic stroke. Secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and type 2, 3, and 5 bleeding events defined by the Academic Research Consortium on Hemorrhage (BARC) within 5 years. The secondary preventive drugs was recorded, including antiplatelet drugs, statins, beta blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensinⅡreceptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), etc. Before and after the matching, the secondary preventive medication and the incidence of clinical events of the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 7 049 ACS patients, including 1 958 patients in the southern region group and 5 091 patients in the northern region group were enrolled in this study. There were 5 319 males (37.9%), and the aged was (60.7±6.7) years. After propensity score matching, there were 1 324 cases in each group. Before matching, in the northern region group, the proportion of smoking, hypertension and diabetes, previous history (myocardial infarction, PCI and stroke) and family history of coronary heart disease were higher (all P<0.05). The proportion of complex lesions, diffuse lesions, small vessel lesions and thrombotic lesions in the northern region group was higher than that in the southern region group (all P<0.05). Sixty months after discharge, the antiplatelet patterns were quite different between patients in the northern and southern region group (P<0.001). The proportion of clopidogrel monotherapy in the southern region group was higher than that in the northern region group (9.8% (130/1324) vs. 1.1% (14/1324)), while the proportion of aspirin monotherapy in the northern region group was higher than that in the southern region group (67.4% (893/1324) vs. 46.5% (616/1324)). As for the use of other secondary prophylactic drugs, the proportion of patients in southern region group receiving beta blockers (24.5% (325/1324) vs. 16.8% (222/1324), P<0.001) and ACEI/ARB (19.4% (257/1324) vs. 10.0% (133/1324), P<0.001) was higher than that in northern region group. After matching, the incidence of MACCE (8.4%(111/1 324) vs.6.2% (82/1 324), P=0.030) and BARC 2, 3 and 5 bleeding (6.0% (80/1 324) vs. 4.0% (53/1 324), P=0.020) was higher in patients in northern region group. Conclusions: ACS patients who undergo PCI in northern area hospital is at higher prevalence of comorbidities and complicated coronary artery lesions compared to patients in the southern area hospital, and the drug compliance is worse than that in southern area, and the prognosis is also relatively poor.
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Aged ; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; China ; Humans ; Male ; Medication Adherence ; Middle Aged ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Prospective Studies ; Secondary Prevention ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To analyze the status of early use of oral β-blocker and its relationship with in-hospital outcomes in eligible patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: The study was based on the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC)-ACS project. The data of ACS patients that collected during 2014 to 2019 from 230 collaborating hospitals across China were analyzed. Propensity score matching method and Cox multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the association between early use of oral β-blocker and in-hospital outcomes within 15 days. Results: A total of 38 663 eligible ACS patients were included in this study. The mean age was (57.0±9.0), and 78.8% of the ACS patients (30 470/38 663) were male. The proportion of early use of oral β-blockers was 64.9% (25 112/38 663), but varied substantially, in the 230 hospitals with a range from 0 to 100%. Compared with the patients no early use of oral β-blocker, the patients receiving early oral β-blocker had significantly lower incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) (3.4% (395/11 536) vs. 2.9%(339/11 536), P=0.036)and less occurrences of heart failure (2.7% (316/11 536) vs. 2.1% (248/11 536), P=0.004). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed the patients receiving early oral β-blocker had 15.5%, 23.1%, and 35.3% lower risks of MACEs, heart failure and cardiogenic shock respectively than the patients no early oral β-blocker. Conclusions: Compared with the patients no early oral β-blocker, the patients receiving early oral β-blocker had lower risks of MACEs events, heart failure and cardiogenic shock. However, the early use of oral β-blocker in ACS patients was generally insufficient with huge differences among different hospitals in China.
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Heart Failure ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Shock, Cardiogenic

Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

Objective: To assess the expanding needs on lipid-lowering treatment in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by applying newly issued definition of extreme high-risk, which is proposed by Chinese expert consensus on lipid management of extreme high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients of Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC). Methods: Data of this study was derived from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project, which was a case-based nationwide registry study and launched as a collaborative initiative by the American Heart Association and the CSC. The project consecutively recruited ACS patients from158 tertiary hospitals and 82 second hospitals across China, and detailed clinical information of patients was collected. This study enrolled ACS inpatients in CCC project from November 2014 to July 2019. The proportion of extreme high-risk patients, their characteristics, mean LDL-C levels at admission, the gap between measured LDL-C level and the new target, and lipid-lowering therapy at discharge were assessed. Results: Among 104 516 ACS inpatients enrolled in this study, 75.1% (78 527/104 516) met the criteria of extreme high-risk and were expected to achieve the new LDL-C goal. Among patients at extreme high-risk, 21.2% (16 651/78 527) had multiple severe ASCVD events and 78.8% (61 876/78 527) had 1 severe ASCVD event and at least two high-risk factors. For the extreme high-risk patients, the mean level of LDL-C at admission was (2.8±1.0) mmol/L, prevalence of LDL-C ≥1.4 mmol/L was 93.4% (73 307/78 527) and the median gap between LDL-C level at admission and the target of 1.4 mmol/L was 1.3 (0.8, 2.0) mmol/L. If LDL-C could be further reduced to 50% of the admission level, we estimated that 55.6% (43 632/78 527) of the extreme high-risk patients would achieve the new LDL-C goal. Among 40 875 patients with information about discharge statin dosage, 93.5% (28 004/29 947) of the extreme high-risk patients were prescribed with statins at discharge, and among them 95.1% (26 632/28 004) received statin monotherapy and 91.1% (25 501/28 004) were at moderate doses of statins. Conclusion: About three fourth of inpatients with ACS were categorized as extreme high-risk based on the new definition of CSC expert consensuses, nine out of ten patients at extreme high-risk didn't achieve the new LDL-C target at admission, and the intensity of lipid-lowering therapy was insufficient in clinical practice. There are substantially expanding needs for implementing more intensive and effective lipid-lowering strategies.
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Asians ; Cardiology ; China ; Cholesterol, LDL ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors ; Lipids ; United States

Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Aged ; Clopidogrel/therapeutic use* ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Ticagrelor/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome