Primary hospitals are engaged in such responsibilities as diagnosis and treatment of endemic diseases and common illnesses of the locality, as well as relevant research work which bears more prominent importance than ever before. Given the importance of research, the hospitals are mostly plagued by such setbacks as obsolete research management concepts, poor experiences, poor perception of research, poor professional competency and lack of academic exchange among the medical workers. A primary hospital had set up a novel management mechanism, featuring " full-staff involvement, full-process supervision and full-dimensional guidance" , and " tight formal examination and tight content examination" . This mechanism has been in place since 2016 in research project management practice, achieving such progresses as significant rise in the number of research project applications, that of approved projects, and project implementation capabilities.Future improvements in this regard should be made in higher pertinence, optimized management flow and better research service system.

Objective:Exploring the " bottle neck" factors in the scientific research management of recipient hospitals, making good use of counterpart support resources to help identifying appropriate, tailored strategies of scientific research management that might improve the research capacity of recipient hospitals.Methods:Data were collected according to questionnaire survey and on-site interview, ABC classification method were used to perform statistical analysis, and " bottleneck" factors that constraint the scientific research work of the recipient hospital were summarized.Results:" Insufficient scientific research skills and lacking of talents" and " lacking of scientific research environment and recognition" are the two most prominent factors that negatively affect the scientific research capacity building of the recipient hospitals, followed closely by " the out-dated scientific research policies and lacking support from the hospital leadership" , insufficient of research platform or resources including research funding, as well as other factors. Based on such findings, this article took the First People's Hospital of Kashgar (Guangdong counterpart support) as an example, and tried to discuss some corresponding measures on how to make good use of counterpart support resources.Conclusions:The ABC classification method were used to identify the main " bottleneck" factors, and a series of effective measures that help to making good use of counterpart support resources were explored. As a result, the efficiency of the scientific research management of the recipient hospitals, which in terms of management methods, management concepts and management models, were improved.