1.Histopathologic support of the 2 cm distal resection margin for rectal carcinoma.
Abella Andrei Cesar S ; Roxas Manuel Francisco T ; Chang Robert L ; Asprer Jonathan M
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 2002;57(2):59-61
Recent evidence has shown that a five-centimeter distal margin is not required for cancers of the rectum. These findings proved significant in that selected patients with low rectal lesions can be offered curative operations that can preserve normal sphincter function, an intact route of defecation, and have a better quality of life. From August 2000 to July 2001, we began our series of examining specimens after rectal resection to determine the negative distal margin. The specimens for pathologic examination were cut at 0.5 cm intervals up to 2.0 cm from the raised distal edge of the tumor. The objective of this paper is to determine the distance of intramural tumor spread of rectal cancer from the macroscopic tumor edge. During the one-year period, a total of 11 specimens from rectal cancer patients were examined, ages of the patients ranged from 29 to 77 years. Eighty-two percent of patients had locally advanced (T3 and T4) lesions. Lymph node involvement was seen in 72 percent. Analysis of distal margins showed the following: five of 11 (45 percent) were positive for malignant cells at 0.5 cm from the tumor edge, four of 11 (36 percent) positive at 1.0 cm, one of 11 (nine percent) positive at 1.5 cm, and no malignant cells were seen at 2.0 cm distal margin. Our early results support the adequacy of a 2 cm distal resection margin for rectal cancer surgery. (Author)
Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Rectum ; Margins Of Excision ; Defecation ; Rectal Neoplasms ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Patient Selection ; Lymph Nodes
2.The Philippine College of Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on preoperative evaluation of ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery.
Alfred Philip O. De Dios ; Andrei Cesar S. Abella ; Leonardo O. Ona III ; Maria Cheryl L. Cucueco ; Joy Grace G. Jerusalem ; Jose Modesto B. Abellera III ; Jesus Fernando B. Inciong ; Ma. Luisa D. Aquino
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 2017;72(2):39-51
It is the practice in most health care institutions in our country to have patients for elective surgery evaluated pre-operatively by Internists and Anesthesiologists. Practitioners don’t seem to agree on how this is to be carried out. Each institution has its own protocol and even individual physicians have their own preference, which they have learned either during their training or from experience.
Physicians usually request for preoperative tests for patients undergoing elective surgery in order to minimize risk, and to serve as a baseline to detect subsequent changes. Several authors agree to this as the goal of pre-operative evaluation. This is being done to identify risk factors and to screen broadly for undiagnosed disease. Undiagnosed clinical conditions are correlated with the risk of complications during the perioperative period. This then allows the physician to identify patients with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and to help them design preoperative strategies that can reduce these risks. These tests can be helpful to stratify risk and guide postoperative management; however, most of them are obtained because of protocol rather than medical necessity.
Majority of surgeries performed are non-cardiac in nature. Mortality rates for these procedures can be as high as 4% depending on the patient’s risk and type of surgery. Cardiovascular complications account for half of all morbidities and mortalities in the perioperative period for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Human
;
Male
;
Female
;
Adult
;
Elective Surgical Procedures
;
Preoperative Care
;
Surgeons
;
Universities