We designed and evaluated an objective structured biostatistics examination (OSBE) on a trial basis to determine whether it was feasible for formative or summative assessment. At Ataturk University, we have a seminar system for curriculum for every cohort of all five years undergraduate education. Each seminar consists of an integrated system for different subjects, every year three to six seminars that meet for six to eight weeks, and at the end of each seminar term we conduct an examination as a formative assessment. In 2010, 201 students took the OSBE, and in 2011, 211 students took the same examination at the end of a seminar that had biostatistics as one module. The examination was conducted in four groups and we examined two groups together. Each group had to complete 5 stations in each row therefore we had two parallel lines with different instructions to be followed, thus we simultaneously examined 10 students in these two parallel lines. The students were invited after the examination to receive feedback from the examiners and provide their reflections. There was a significant (P=0.004) difference between male and female scores in the 2010 students, but no gender difference was found in 2011. The comparison among the parallel lines and among the four groups showed that two groups, A and B, did not show a significant difference (P>0.05) in either class. Nonetheless, among the four groups, there was a significant difference in both 2010 (P=0.001) and 2011 (P=0.001). The inter-rater reliability coefficient was 0.60. Overall, the students were satisfied with the testing method; however, they felt some stress. The overall experience of the OSBE was useful in terms of learning, as well as for assessment.
Biostatistics ; Cohort Studies ; Curriculum ; Female ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Pilot Projects

No abstract available.
Education, Medical

The etiology of recurrent miscarriage (RM) is extremely heterogeneous, encompassing genetic, immunological, anatomical, endocrine, thrombophilic, infectious, and uterine abnormalities. Thrombophilia is a major contributor to pregnancy complications, potentially harming the fetus and jeopardizing the continuation of pregnancy. Therefore, successful pregnancy outcomes depend on maintaining a delicate balance between coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, crucial for ensuring the adjustment of the basal plate to facilitate adequate placental perfusion. Despite numerous studies shedding light on the role of thrombophilic factors and genetic variations in RM, the exact pathogenesis remains unclear. It is imperative to systematically rule out thrombophilia and other related factors responsible for pregnancy disorders and RMs to guide appropriate and active management strategies. Addressing thrombophilia continues to present challenges in terms of effective treatment. The current review aims to address the heterogeneity of RM as a therapeutic challenge, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic tests and welldesigned multicenter research trials to gather robust, evidence-based data on thrombophilic causes of RM and provide effective treatment. The goal is to enhance the understanding of thrombophilic factors and genetic landscapes associated with RM through various approaches, including candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and high-throughput sequencing. Meta-analyses have underscored the significance of genetic aberrations in RM, highlighting the necessity for identifying critical mutations implicated in the etiopathogenesis of miscarriages to pave the way for implementation of targeted clinical therapies.

The etiology of recurrent miscarriage (RM) is extremely heterogeneous, encompassing genetic, immunological, anatomical, endocrine, thrombophilic, infectious, and uterine abnormalities. Thrombophilia is a major contributor to pregnancy complications, potentially harming the fetus and jeopardizing the continuation of pregnancy. Therefore, successful pregnancy outcomes depend on maintaining a delicate balance between coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, crucial for ensuring the adjustment of the basal plate to facilitate adequate placental perfusion. Despite numerous studies shedding light on the role of thrombophilic factors and genetic variations in RM, the exact pathogenesis remains unclear. It is imperative to systematically rule out thrombophilia and other related factors responsible for pregnancy disorders and RMs to guide appropriate and active management strategies. Addressing thrombophilia continues to present challenges in terms of effective treatment. The current review aims to address the heterogeneity of RM as a therapeutic challenge, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic tests and welldesigned multicenter research trials to gather robust, evidence-based data on thrombophilic causes of RM and provide effective treatment. The goal is to enhance the understanding of thrombophilic factors and genetic landscapes associated with RM through various approaches, including candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and high-throughput sequencing. Meta-analyses have underscored the significance of genetic aberrations in RM, highlighting the necessity for identifying critical mutations implicated in the etiopathogenesis of miscarriages to pave the way for implementation of targeted clinical therapies.

The etiology of recurrent miscarriage (RM) is extremely heterogeneous, encompassing genetic, immunological, anatomical, endocrine, thrombophilic, infectious, and uterine abnormalities. Thrombophilia is a major contributor to pregnancy complications, potentially harming the fetus and jeopardizing the continuation of pregnancy. Therefore, successful pregnancy outcomes depend on maintaining a delicate balance between coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, crucial for ensuring the adjustment of the basal plate to facilitate adequate placental perfusion. Despite numerous studies shedding light on the role of thrombophilic factors and genetic variations in RM, the exact pathogenesis remains unclear. It is imperative to systematically rule out thrombophilia and other related factors responsible for pregnancy disorders and RMs to guide appropriate and active management strategies. Addressing thrombophilia continues to present challenges in terms of effective treatment. The current review aims to address the heterogeneity of RM as a therapeutic challenge, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic tests and welldesigned multicenter research trials to gather robust, evidence-based data on thrombophilic causes of RM and provide effective treatment. The goal is to enhance the understanding of thrombophilic factors and genetic landscapes associated with RM through various approaches, including candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and high-throughput sequencing. Meta-analyses have underscored the significance of genetic aberrations in RM, highlighting the necessity for identifying critical mutations implicated in the etiopathogenesis of miscarriages to pave the way for implementation of targeted clinical therapies.

The etiology of recurrent miscarriage (RM) is extremely heterogeneous, encompassing genetic, immunological, anatomical, endocrine, thrombophilic, infectious, and uterine abnormalities. Thrombophilia is a major contributor to pregnancy complications, potentially harming the fetus and jeopardizing the continuation of pregnancy. Therefore, successful pregnancy outcomes depend on maintaining a delicate balance between coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, crucial for ensuring the adjustment of the basal plate to facilitate adequate placental perfusion. Despite numerous studies shedding light on the role of thrombophilic factors and genetic variations in RM, the exact pathogenesis remains unclear. It is imperative to systematically rule out thrombophilia and other related factors responsible for pregnancy disorders and RMs to guide appropriate and active management strategies. Addressing thrombophilia continues to present challenges in terms of effective treatment. The current review aims to address the heterogeneity of RM as a therapeutic challenge, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic tests and welldesigned multicenter research trials to gather robust, evidence-based data on thrombophilic causes of RM and provide effective treatment. The goal is to enhance the understanding of thrombophilic factors and genetic landscapes associated with RM through various approaches, including candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and high-throughput sequencing. Meta-analyses have underscored the significance of genetic aberrations in RM, highlighting the necessity for identifying critical mutations implicated in the etiopathogenesis of miscarriages to pave the way for implementation of targeted clinical therapies.

The etiology of recurrent miscarriage (RM) is extremely heterogeneous, encompassing genetic, immunological, anatomical, endocrine, thrombophilic, infectious, and uterine abnormalities. Thrombophilia is a major contributor to pregnancy complications, potentially harming the fetus and jeopardizing the continuation of pregnancy. Therefore, successful pregnancy outcomes depend on maintaining a delicate balance between coagulation and fibrinolytic factors, crucial for ensuring the adjustment of the basal plate to facilitate adequate placental perfusion. Despite numerous studies shedding light on the role of thrombophilic factors and genetic variations in RM, the exact pathogenesis remains unclear. It is imperative to systematically rule out thrombophilia and other related factors responsible for pregnancy disorders and RMs to guide appropriate and active management strategies. Addressing thrombophilia continues to present challenges in terms of effective treatment. The current review aims to address the heterogeneity of RM as a therapeutic challenge, emphasizing the need for standardized diagnostic tests and welldesigned multicenter research trials to gather robust, evidence-based data on thrombophilic causes of RM and provide effective treatment. The goal is to enhance the understanding of thrombophilic factors and genetic landscapes associated with RM through various approaches, including candidate gene studies, genome-wide association studies, and high-throughput sequencing. Meta-analyses have underscored the significance of genetic aberrations in RM, highlighting the necessity for identifying critical mutations implicated in the etiopathogenesis of miscarriages to pave the way for implementation of targeted clinical therapies.

PURPOSE: No study had been conducted to assess the hospitals' environment for learning purposes in multicenter sites in Saudi Arabia. It aims to evaluate the environment of hospitals for learning purposes of pediatric residents. METHODS: We applied Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) to measure the learning environment at six teaching hospitals in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia from September to December 2013. RESULTS: The number of respondents was 104 (86.7%) out of 120 residents and 37 females and 67 male residents have responded. The residents' response scored 100 out of 160 maximum score in rating of PHEEM that showed overall learning environment is favorable for training. There were some items in the social support domain suggesting improvements. There was no significant difference between male and female residents. There was a difference among the participant teaching hospitals (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The result pointed an overall positive rating. Individual item scores suggested that their social life during residency could be uninspiring. They have the low satisfactory level and they feel racism, and sexual discrimination. Therefore, there is still a room for improvement.
Surveys and Questionnaires ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Internship and Residency* ; Learning ; Male ; Pediatrics ; Racism ; Saudi Arabia*

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic placed unprecedented strain on hospital resources and manpower. This study assesses the impact of Malaysia’s nationwide lockdown on the incidence, types, severity, and outcomes of emergency general surgery (EGS) cases at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed the data of patients who underwent EGS procedures for the period 2017 and 2021. Results: During the pandemic period, there was a 48.3% reduction in EGS cases (n=889) compared to the pre-pandemic period (n=1720). Significant reductions were observed in surgeries for appendicitis, soft tissue infection, colorectal, urology, peptic ulcer, and vascular disorders in the COVID period. Conversely, procedures for biliary disorders and hernia complications increased by 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Length of hospital stay increased by 57.8% for patients with small bowel disorders, while ICU/HDU admissions rose by 43.5% for colorectal cases (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in mortality rates between the two periods. Conclusions The overall reduction in EGS procedures during the COVID-19 period was consistent with global trends. Despite the challenges posed by the pandemic, the outcomes related to duration of stay, ICU/HDU utilisation, and mortality remained comparable to the pre-pandemic period. These findings highlight the adaptability of healthcare professionals in maintaining continuity and quality of emergency surgical care during a crisis.
Acute Care Surgery ; COVID-19 ; Pandemics