No abstract available.
Abdominal Pain* ; Child* ; Diagnosis* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Abdominal Pain* ; Child* ; Diagnosis* ; Humans

PURPOSE: To present a diagnostic sign on MRI and US in patients with ovarian torsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present characteristic imaging findings in eight patients with surgically-proven ovarian torsion. MRI was performed in four patients, CT in six and US in all patients; the procedures including eight transabdominal US(TAS) and three transvaginal US(TVS). In each study, imaging findings were analyzed for the appearance of twisted pedicle and the presence of a "whirling sign". RESULTS: The pedicle which indicates ovarian torsion was detected on MRI in all 4 patients, on TAS in 4/7, on TVS in 3/3, and on CT in 4/6. A specific "whirling sign" was detected on MRI in 2/4 patients, on TAS in 2/4, and on TVS in all three. On CT a "whirling sign" was not detected. CONCLUSION: The "whirling sign" on both MRI & US is a characteristic finding of ovarian torsion; in a patient with adnexal mass and complaining of lower abdominal pain, the presence of this sign is very useful for the diagnosis of ovarian torsion.
Abdominal Pain ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PURPOSE: To present a diagnostic sign on MRI and US in patients with ovarian torsion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present characteristic imaging findings in eight patients with surgically-proven ovarian torsion. MRI was performed in four patients, CT in six and US in all patients; the procedures including eight transabdominal US(TAS) and three transvaginal US(TVS). In each study, imaging findings were analyzed for the appearance of twisted pedicle and the presence of a "whirling sign". RESULTS: The pedicle which indicates ovarian torsion was detected on MRI in all 4 patients, on TAS in 4/7, on TVS in 3/3, and on CT in 4/6. A specific "whirling sign" was detected on MRI in 2/4 patients, on TAS in 2/4, and on TVS in all three. On CT a "whirling sign" was not detected. CONCLUSION: The "whirling sign" on both MRI & US is a characteristic finding of ovarian torsion; in a patient with adnexal mass and complaining of lower abdominal pain, the presence of this sign is very useful for the diagnosis of ovarian torsion.
Abdominal Pain ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

An omental cyst is an uncommon intra-abdominal tumor. The pathogenesis of omental cysts are unknown, as the majority are asymptomatic and if found at all are discovered incidentally during abdominal exploration or radiologic examination. A correct preoperative diagnosis of an omental cyst is very difficult as the information provided by CT and ultrasound imaging is often insufficient to support a differential diagnosis. However, with the increasing availability of ultrasound and CT, preoperative diagnoses of omental cysts are being made more frequently. An exception to this occurs in children, in whom abdominal pain secondary to the cyst may be dominant, necessitating surgical intervention. The most common symptoms and physical findings are abdominal pain and a smooth, non-tender, mobile, palpable mass. Recently, we encountered a case of an omental cyst in a surgically removed omentum. This case is reported with a review of the literature.
Abdominal Pain ; Child ; Diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Humans ; Omentum ; Ultrasonography

Anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) is one the most common cause of chronic abdominal wall pain. The syndrome is mostly misdiagnosed, treated wrongly and inadequately. If diagnosed correctly by history, examination and a positive carnett test, the suffering of the patient can be relieved by addressing the cause i.e. local anaesthetic with steroid injection at the entrapment site. Conventionally, the injection is done by landmark technique. In this report, we have described 2 patients who were diagnosed with ACNES who were offered ultrasound guided transverses abdominis plane (TAP) injection who got significant pain relief for a long duration of time.
Abdominal Muscles ; Abdominal Pain ; Abdominal Wall ; Anatomic Landmarks ; Chronic Pain ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Nerve Block ; Nerve Compression Syndromes* ; Ultrasonography*

PURPOSE: We wanted to determine the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) for patients with clinically-suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis, and we wanted to evaluate the differences of the sensitivity and specificity of CT according to the period of time from onset of the signs and symptoms to the performance of CT. METHODS: A retrospective study was done on 273 patients who visited our hospital for acute abdominal pain from Jan. 2003 to Dec. 2005, and they could not be excluded as suffering from acute appendicitis by their symptoms nor signs. RESULTS: Forty-three (15.8%) of the 273 patients did not undergo operation because their condition was not diagnosed as acute appendicitis and 190 patients were diagnosed as acute appendicitis by CT. The other 40 patients underwent diagnostic laparotomy because acute appendicitis could not be confirmed and any other diagnosis could not be made. The patients were classified into 6 groups according to the period of time from the onset of symptoms and signs to the performance of CT. The sensitivity of CT after 48 hours was statistically significantly increased as compared to performing CT before 48 hours (92.3% vs. 75.8%, respectively; P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Forty-three (15.8%) of the patients with clinically- suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis avoided unnecessary laparotomy by undergoing CT. The sensitivity was increased for diagnosing acute appendicitis by CT when it was performed after 48 hours from the onset of symptoms and signs, but caution may be needed during interpretation because of the false positives (2 patients;4.7%) could due to secondary change of other diseases
Abdominal Pain ; Appendicitis* ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Laparotomy ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity

The usual imaging findings of common splenic infarction are well known, while the findings for splenic infarctions in the accessory spleen or polysplenia are rare; these unusual imaging findings may make the diagnosis difficult. We report here on two patients who have complained of abdominal pain, and they were diagnosed as splenic infarction that developed in either the accessory spleen or as has having polysplenia. We can diagnose splenic infarction that unusually develops in the accessory spleen or polysplenia when we identify a round, hyperechoic, avascular solid mass on US, or when we identify a round, rim-enhancing, hypodense solid mass with adjacent inflammatory changes and a small amount of ascites on CT that is adjacent to the normal spleen or in one of splenules of polysplenia in the clinical settings of acute abdominal pain.
Abdominal Pain ; Ascites ; Child* ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; Infarction* ; Spleen* ; Splenic Infarction

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to verify objectively whether abdominal ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians (EP) in emergency departments (ED) immediately after history taking and physical examination could give effective diagnostic information and to check the feasibility and usefulness of the COUCH method. METHODS: From May 1, 2005 to September 30, 2005 we recruited 368 patients who complained of abdominal pain in the ED. Senior level emergency physicians (EP) conducted history taking and physical examinations, following which they were asked for their suspected diagnosis and their level of confidence (from maximum 5 to minimum 1) regarding each diagnosis. The same EP then performed abdominal ultrasonography (US), using the COUCH method and were again asked for their suspected diagnosis and level of confidence. We compared the suspected diagnoses and levels of confidence before and after abdominal US by using the t-test. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (55 male, 51 female, average age 35.46+/-18.11 years) were enrolled. The number of patients with a suspected diagnosis of after history taking and physical examination only (2.43+/-0.5) was significantly greater than after abdominal US (1.34+/-0.5) (p<0.01). The level of confidences of suspected diagnosis of after history taking and physical examination only (3.43+/-1.14), by contrast, was less than after abdominal US (4.40+/-1.22) (p<0.01). Each year of postgraduate residents could have the same results after US. CONCLUSION: We found that abdominal ultrasonography could give EP more informations for pronouncing a correct diagnosis for patients with abdominal pain in the ED, and the COUCH method could lead the EP to get better training for ultrasonography and to diagnose more rapidly and accurately.
Abdominal Pain ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Emergencies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Physical Examination

Symptoms of a peritoneal progression from ovarian cancer are nonspecific such as abdominal pain, abdominal distention and more. Many imaging studies and serum CA-125 help diagnosis. However, it is difficult to exclude the instances of the diffuse peritoneal diseases that mimic carcinomatosis. The elevated CA-125 level usually correlates with the peritoneal carcimatosis, but it is often found in other peritoneal diseases. Therefore, the pathologic confirmation is necessary because of other mimicking diseases. In our case, CA-125 levels were elevated. Abdominal computed tomography finding was suspected a peritoneal tuberculosis but the pathologic result was the peritoneal carcimatosis, eventually.
Abdominal Pain ; Carcinoma* ; Diagnosis ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Peritoneal Diseases ; Peritonitis, Tuberculous*