1.Accurate determination of wound depth with ultrasound and its forensic significance.
Fei-Xiang WANG ; Li-Hua FAN ; Xiao-Ping YANG ; Rui-Jue LIU ; Guang-You ZHU
Journal of Forensic Medicine 2008;24(3):197-199
Accurate determination of the wound depth has long been a difficult task in forensic medicine due to lack of technology. Nowadays, the depth of the wound can be accurately determined by using high frequency 2-D ultrasound and Color Doppler Flow Imaging (CDFI). Two typical cases with ultrasonic images were reported to show the importance of ultrasound technology in forensic medicine. The new technology provides scientific evidence of the injury assessment.
Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging*
;
Arm Injuries
;
Back Injuries/diagnostic imaging*
;
Forensic Medicine
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Multiple Trauma/diagnostic imaging*
;
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color
;
Wounds, Penetrating/diagnostic imaging*
2.Imaging of unilateral adrenal hemorrhages in patients after blunt abdominal trauma: Report of two cases.
Asli Tanrivermis SAYIT ; Emrah SAYIT ; Hediye Pinar GUNBEY ; Kerim ASLAN
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2017;20(1):52-55
Adrenal hemorrhage following blunt abdominal trauma is extremely rare. Most of the lesions are unilateral and right sided. Although often asymptomatic, life-threatening adrenal insufficiency may develop in the bilateral adrenal gland hemorrhage. Isolated adrenal injuries are very rare. They are often associated with other organ injuries. The mortality rates of patients range from 7% to 32%. In this report, we present the computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of unilateral adrenal hemorrhages in two patients with a history of fall from a height.
Abdominal Injuries
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Adrenal Gland Diseases
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Adult
;
Hemorrhage
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Male
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Wounds, Nonpenetrating
;
diagnostic imaging
3.Diagnostic accuracy of CT scan in abdominal blunt trauma.
Javad SALIMI ; Khadyjeh BAKHTAVAR ; Mehdi SOLIMANI ; Patricia KHASHAYAR ; Ali Pasha MEYSAMIE ; Moosa ZARGAR
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2009;12(2):67-70
OBJECTIVETo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of CT scan findings in patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted to the university hospital.
METHODSAll the patients with blunt abdominal trauma admitted at a tertiary teaching trauma center in Iran between 2005 and 2007 were enrolled in this study. In the absence of any clinical manifestations, the patients underwent a diagnostic CT scan. Laparatomy was performed in those with positive CT results. Others were observed for 48 hours and discharged in case no problem was reported; otherwise they underwent laparatomy. Information on patients?demographic data, mechanism of trauma, indication for CT scan, CT scan findings, results of laparotomy were gathered. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the CT-scan images in regard with the organ injured were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the CT scan were calculated in each case.
RESULTSCT scan had the highest sensitivity for detecting the injuries to liver (100%) and spleen (86.6%). The specificity of the method for detecting retroperitoneal hematoma (100%) and injuries to kidney (93.5%) was higher than other organs. The accuracy of CT images to detect the injuries to spleen, liver, kidney and retroperitoneal hematoma was reported to be 96.1%, 94.4%, 91.6% and 91.6% respectively.
CONCLUSIONThe findings of the present study reveal that CT scan could be considered as a good choice, especially for patients with blunt abdominal trauma in teaching hospitals where the radiologic academic staff is not present in the hospital in the night shifts.
Abdominal Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Liver ; injuries ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Spleen ; injuries ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating ; diagnostic imaging ; Young Adult
4.Isolated free intra-abdominal fluid on CT in blunt trauma: The continued diagnostic dilemma.
Victor Y KONG ; Damon JEETOO ; Leah C NAIDOO ; George V OOSTHUIZEN ; Damian L CLARKE
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2015;18(6):357-359
PURPOSEThe clinical significance of isolated free fluid (FF) without solid organ injury on computed to- mography (CT) continues to pose significant dilemma in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).
METHODSWe reviewed the incidence of FF and the clinical outcome amongst patients with blunt abdominal trauma in a metropolitan trauma service in South Africa. We performed a retrospective study of 121 consecutive CT scans over a period of 12 months to determine the incidence of isolated FF and the clinical outcome of patients managed in a large metropolitan trauma service.
RESULTSOf the 121 CTs, FF was identified in 36 patients (30%). Seven patients (6%) had isolated FF. Of the 29 patients who had free fluid and associated organ injuries, 33 organ injuries were identified. 86% (25/ 29) of all 29 patients had a single organ injury and 14% had multiple organ injuries. There were 26 solid organ injuries and 7 hollow organ injuries. The 33 organs injured were: spleen, 12; liver, 8; kidney, 5; pancreas, 2; small bowel, 4; duodenum, 1. Six (21%) patients required operative management for small bowel perforations in 4 cases and pancreatic tail injury in 2 cases. All 7 patients with isolated FF were initially observed, and 3 (43%) were eventually subjected to operative intervention. They were found to have an intra-peritoneal bladder rupture in 1 case, a non-expanding zone 3 haematoma in 1 case, and a negative laparotomy in 1 case. Four (57%) patients were successfully managed without surgical interventions.
CONCLUSIONSIsolated FF is uncommon and the clinical significance remains unclear. Provided that reli- able serial physical examination can be performed by experienced surgeons, an initial non-operative approach should be considered.
Abdominal Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; Adult ; Body Fluids ; diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Retrospective Studies ; South Africa ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating ; diagnostic imaging
5.Correlation of rib fracture patterns with abdominal solid organ injury: A retrospective observational cohort study.
Abdoulhossein DAVOODABADI ; Noshin MOSAVIBIOKI ; Mohammad MASHAYEKHIL ; Hamidreza GILASI ; Esmail Abdorrahim KASHI ; Babak HAGHPANAH
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(1):45-48
PURPOSE:
Rib fractures are one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality and are associated with abdominal solid organ injury (ASOI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of ASOI with the number, location, and involved segments of rib fracture(s) in blunt chest trauma.
METHODS:
This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with blunt chest trauma over the age of 15 years, who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of rib fractures from July 2015 to September 2020. After ethic committee approval, a retrospective chart review was designed and patients with a diagnosis of rib fractures were selected. Patients who had chest and abdominopelvic CT scan were included in the study and additional data including age, gender, injury severity score, trauma mechanism, number and sides of the fractured ribs (left/right/bilateral), rib fracture segments (upper, middle, lower zone) and results of chest and abdominal spiral CT scan were recorded. The correlation between ASOI and the sides, segments and number of rib fracture(s) was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS:
Altogether 1056 patients with rib fracture(s) were included. The mean age was (42.76 ± 13.35) years and 85.4% were male. The most common mechanism of trauma was car accident (34.6%). Most fractures occurred in the middle rib zone (60.44%) and the most commonly involved ribs were the 6th and 7th ones (15.7% and 16.4%, respectively). Concurrent abdominal injuries were observed in 103 patients (34.91%) and were significantly associated with middle zone rib fractures.
CONCLUSION
There is a significant relationship between middle zone rib fractures and ASOI. Intra-abdominal injuries are not restricted to fractures of the lower ribs and thus should always be kept in mind during management of blunt trauma patients with rib fractures.
Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging*
;
Adolescent
;
Adult
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Rib Fractures/epidemiology*
;
Thoracic Injuries/epidemiology*
;
Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging*
6.Multi-slice computed tomography for diagnosis of combined thoracoabdominal injury.
Jun LIU ; Wei-Dong YUE ; Ding-Yuan DU
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2015;18(1):27-32
PURPOSETo investigate the diagnostic value of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for combined thoracoabdominal injury.
METHODSA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data and MSCT images of 68 patients who sustained a combined thoracoabdominal injury associated with diaphragm rupture, and 18 patients without diaphragm rupture. All the patients were admitted and treated in the Chongqing Emergency Medical Center (a level I trauma center) between July 2005 and February 2014. There were 71 males and 15 females with a mean age of 39.1 years (range 13e88 years). Among the 86 patients, 40 patients suffered a penetrating injury, 46 suffered a blunt injury as a result of road traffic accident in 21 cases, fall from a height in 16, and crushing injury in 9. The MSCT images were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists. The results of CT diagnosis were compared with surgical findings and/or follow-up results.
RESULTSAmong the 86 cases, diaphragm discontinuity was found in 29 cases, segmental nonrecognition of the diaphragm in 14, diaphragmatic hernia in 21, collar sign in 14, dependent viscera sign in 18, elevated abdominal organs in 21, bowel wall thickening and/or hematoma in 6, and pneumoperitoneum in 8. CT diagnostic accuracy for diaphragm rupture was 88.4% in the right side and 90.7% in the left side. CT diagnostic accuracy for hemopneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, mediastinal hemorrhage, kidney and adrenal gland injuries was 100%, while for liver, spleen and pancreas injuries was 96.5%, 96.5%, 94.2% respectively.
CONCLUSIONTo reach an early diagnosis of combined thoracoabdominal injury, surgeons and radiologists should be familiar with all kinds of images which might show signs of diaphragm rupture, such as diaphragm discontinuity, segmental nonrecognition of the diaphragm, dangling diaphragm sign, diaphragm herniation, collar sign, dependent viscera sign, and elevated abdominal organs.
Abdominal Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diaphragm ; injuries ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multidetector Computed Tomography ; methods ; Multiple Trauma ; diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Thoracic Injuries ; diagnostic imaging
7.Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture with combined thoracoabdominal injuries: Difference between penetrating and blunt injuries.
Jin-Mou GAO ; Ding-Yuan DU ; Hui LI ; Chao-Pu LIU ; Shao-Yong LIANG ; Qiang XIAO ; Shan-Hong ZHAO ; Jun YANG ; Xi LIN
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2015;18(1):21-26
PURPOSETraumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) needs early diagnosis and operation. However, the early diagnosis is usually difficult, especially in the patients without diaphragmatic hernia. The objective of this study was to explore the early diagnosis and treatment of TDR.
METHODSData of 256 patients with TDR treated in our department between 1994 and 2013 were analyzed retrospectively regarding to the diagnostic methods, percentage of preoperative judgment, incidence of diaphragmatic hernia, surgical procedures and outcome, etc. Two groups were set up according to the mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating).
RESULTSOf 256 patients with a mean age of 32.4 years (9-84), 218 were male. The average ISS was 26.9 (13-66); and shock rate was 62.9%. There were 104 blunt injuries and 152 penetrating injuries. Preoperatively diagnostic rate was 90.4% in blunt injuries and 80.3% in penetrating, respectively, P < 0.05. The incidence of diaphragmatic hernia was 94.2% in blunt and 15.1% in penetrating respectively, P < 0.005. Thoracotomy was performed in 62 cases, laparotomy in 153, thoracotomy plus laparotomy in 29, and combined thoraco-laparotomy in 12. Overall mortality rate was 12.5% with the average ISS of 41.8; and it was 21.2% in blunt injuries and 6.6% in penetrating, respectively, P < 0.005. The main causes of death were hemorrhage and sepsis.
CONCLUSIONSDiagnosis of blunt TDR can be easily obtained by radiograph or helical CT scan signs of diaphragmatic hernia. For penetrating TDR without hernia, "offside sign" is helpful as initial assessment. CT scan with coronal/sagittal reconstruction is an accurate technique for diagnosis. All TDR require operation. Penetrating injury has a relatively better prognosis.
Abdominal Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Diaphragm ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Trauma ; diagnostic imaging ; Retrospective Studies ; Rupture ; Thoracic Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating ; diagnostic imaging ; Wounds, Penetrating ; diagnostic imaging
8.Increased incidence of adrenal gland injury in blunt abdominal trauma: a computed tomography-based study from Pakistan.
Muhammad Usman AZIZ ; Saleha SHAHZAD ; Muhammad Ayiub MANSOOR
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2014;17(1):31-34
OBJECTIVETo determine the frequency of adrenal injuries in patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma by computed tomography (CT).
METHODSDuring a 6 month period from January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011, 82 emergency CT examinations were performed in the setting of major abdominal trauma and retrospectively reviewed for adrenal gland injuries.
RESULTSA total of 7 patients were identified as having adrenal gland injuries (6 males and 1 female). Two patients had isolated adrenal gland injuries. In the other 5 patients with nonisolated injuries, injuries to the liver (1 case), spleen (1 case), retroperitoneum (2 cases) and mesentery (4 cases) were identified. Overall 24 cases with liver injuries (29%), 11 cases with splenic injuries (13%), 54 cases with mesenteric injuries (65%), 14 cases (17%) with retroperitoneal injuries and 9 cases with renal injuries were identified.
CONCLUSIONAdrenal gland injury is identified in 7 patients (11.7%) out of a total of 82 patients who underwent CT after major abdominal trauma. Most of these cases were nonisolated injuries. Our experience indicates that adrenal injury resulting from trauma is more common than suggested by other reports. The rise in incidence of adrenal injuries could be attributed to the mode of injury.
Abdominal Injuries ; diagnostic imaging ; epidemiology ; Adrenal Glands ; diagnostic imaging ; injuries ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pakistan ; epidemiology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating ; diagnostic imaging ; epidemiology
9.Successful management of an iatrogenically-ingested sharp foreign body.
Gavin C W KANG ; Preetha MADHUKUMAR
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2008;37(11):980-981
Adult
;
Cecum
;
diagnostic imaging
;
injuries
;
pathology
;
Colonoscopy
;
methods
;
Foreign-Body Migration
;
diagnostic imaging
;
etiology
;
surgery
;
Humans
;
Iatrogenic Disease
;
Male
;
Needles
;
Radiography, Abdominal
10.Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan with oral and intravenous contrast versus CT scan with intravenous contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma.
Iraj GOLIKHATIR ; Mohammad SAZGAR ; Fatemeh JAHANIAN ; Seyed Jalal MOUSAVI AMIRI ; Hamed AMINIAHIDASHTI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2023;26(3):174-177
PURPOSE:
Abdominal CT scan using oral and intravenous (IV) contrast is helpful in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries. However, the use of oral and IV contrast delays the process of diagnosis and increases the risk of aspiration. It has also been shown that CT scan with IV contrast alone is as helpful as CT scan with oral and IV contrast and rectal CT scan in detecting abdominal injuries. Therefore, the present study aims to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of CT scan with oral and IV contrast versus CT scan with IV contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).
METHODS:
Altogether 123 BAT patients, 60 (48.8%) women and 63 (51.2%) men with the mean age of (40.4 ± 18.7) years who referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Educational and Medical Center in Sari, Iran (a tertiary trauma center in north of Iran) from November 2014 to March 2017 and underwent abdominal CT scans + laparotomy were investigated. Those with penetrating trauma or hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: abdominal CT scan with oral and IV contrast (n = 63) and CT scan with IV contrast alone (n = 60). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the hemodynamic parameters, age, gender, injury mechanisms (all p > 0.05). The results of CT scan were compared with that of laparotomy results. The collected data were recorded in SPSS version 22.0 for Windows. Quantitative data were presented as mean and SD.
RESULTS:
The sensitivity and specificity of CT scan using oral and IV contrast in the diagnosis of BAT were estimated at 96.48 (95% CI: 90.73 - 99.92) and 92.67 (95% CI: 89.65 - 94.88), respectively; while CT scan with IV contrast alone achieved a comparable sensitivity and specificity of 96.6 (95% CI: 87.45 - 99,42 and 92.84 (95% CI: 89.88 - 95.00), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CT scan with IV contrast alone can be used to assess visceral injuries in BAT patients with normal hemodynamics to avoid diagnostic delay.
Male
;
Humans
;
Female
;
Young Adult
;
Adult
;
Middle Aged
;
Delayed Diagnosis
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
;
Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging*
;
Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging*
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Retrospective Studies