1.Plague in Iran: its history and current status.
Abdolrazagh HASHEMI SHAHRAKI ; Elizabeth CARNIEL ; Ehsan MOSTAFAVI
Epidemiology and Health 2016;38(1):e2016033-
OBJECTIVES: Plague remains a public health concern worldwide, particularly in old foci. Multiple epidemics of this disease have been recorded throughout the history of Iran. Despite the long-standing history of human plague in Iran, it remains difficult to obtain an accurate overview of the history and current status of plague in Iran. METHODS: In this review, available data and reports on cases and outbreaks of human plague in the past and present in Iran and in neighboring countries were collected, and information was compiled regarding when, where, and how many cases occurred. RESULTS: This paper considers the history of plague in Persia (the predecessor of today’s Iran) and has a brief review of plague in countries in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region, including a range of countries in the Middle East and North Africa. CONCLUSIONS: Since Iran has experienced outbreaks of plague for several centuries, neighboring countries have reported the disease in recent years, the disease can be silent for decades, and the circulation of Yersinia pestis has been reported among rodents and dogs in western Iran, more attention should be paid to disease monitoring in areas with previously reported human cases and in high-risk regions with previous epizootic and enzootic activity.
Africa, Northern
;
Animals
;
Disease Outbreaks
;
Dogs
;
History of Medicine
;
Humans
;
Iran*
;
Mediterranean Region
;
Middle East
;
Persia
;
Plague*
;
Public Health
;
Rodentia
;
World Health Organization
;
Yersinia pestis
2.Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among tuberculosis laboratory workers in Iran
Mahshid NASEHI ; Abdolrazagh HASHEMI-SHAHRAKI ; Amin DOOSTI-IRANI ; Saeed SHARAFI ; Ehsan MOSTAFAVI
Epidemiology and Health 2017;39(1):2017002-
OBJECTIVES: The risk of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients to health care workers (HCWs) is a neglected problem in many countries, including Iran. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) among TB laboratory staff in Iran, and to elucidate the risk factors associated with LTBI.METHODS: All TB laboratory staff (689 individuals) employed in the TB laboratories of 50 Iranian universities of medical sciences and a random sample consisting of 317 low-risk HCWs were included in this cross-sectional study. Participants with tuberculin skin test indurations of 10 mm or more were considered to have an LTBI.RESULTS: The prevalence of LTBI among TB laboratory staff and low-risk HCWs was 24.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.31 to 27.74%) and 14.82% (95% CI, 11.31 to 19.20%), respectively. No active TB cases were found in either group. After adjusting for potential confounders, TB laboratory staff were more likely to have an LTBI than low-risk HCWs (prevalence odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.17).CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that LTBI are an occupational health problem among TB laboratory staff in Iran. This study reinforces the need to design and implement simple, effective, and affordable TB infection control programs in TB laboratories in Iran.
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Infection Control
;
Iran
;
Latent Tuberculosis
;
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
;
Occupational Health
;
Odds Ratio
;
Prevalence
;
Risk Factors
;
Skin Tests
;
Tuberculin
;
Tuberculin Test
;
Tuberculosis
3.Comparison of the tuberculin skin test and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test in detecting latent tuberculosis in health care workers in Iran.
Ehsan MOSTAFAVI ; Mahshid NASEHI ; Abdolrazagh HASHEMI SHAHRAKI ; Saber ESMAEILI ; Ebrahim GHADERI ; Saeed SHARAFI ; Amin DOOSTI-IRANI
Epidemiology and Health 2016;38(1):e2016032-
OBJECTIVES: The tuberculin skin test (TST) and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (QFT) are used to identify latent tuberculosis infections (LTBIs). The aim of this study was to determine the agreement between these two tests among health care workers in Iran. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 177 tuberculosis (TB) laboratory staff and 67 non-TB staff. TST indurations of 10 mm or more were considered positive. The Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used to compare the mean score and proportion of variables between the TB laboratory staff and the non-TB laboratory staff. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate the agreement between these tests, and logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors associated with positive results for each test. RESULTS: The prevalence of LTBIs according to both the QFT and the TST was 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12% to 21%) and 16% (95% CI, 11% to 21%), respectively. The agreement between the QFT and the TST was 77.46%, with a kappa of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevalence of LTBI based on the QFT and the TST was not significantly different, the kappa statistic was low between these two tests for the detection of LTBIs.
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Delivery of Health Care*
;
Iran*
;
Latent Tuberculosis*
;
Logistic Models
;
Prevalence
;
Risk Factors
;
Skin Tests*
;
Skin*
;
Tuberculin*
;
Tuberculosis
4.Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among tuberculosis laboratory workers in Iran.
Mahshid NASEHI ; Abdolrazagh HASHEMI-SHAHRAKI ; Amin DOOSTI-IRANI ; Saeed SHARAFI ; Ehsan MOSTAFAVI
Epidemiology and Health 2017;39(1):e2017002-
OBJECTIVES: The risk of transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients to health care workers (HCWs) is a neglected problem in many countries, including Iran. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection (LTBI) among TB laboratory staff in Iran, and to elucidate the risk factors associated with LTBI. METHODS: All TB laboratory staff (689 individuals) employed in the TB laboratories of 50 Iranian universities of medical sciences and a random sample consisting of 317 low-risk HCWs were included in this cross-sectional study. Participants with tuberculin skin test indurations of 10 mm or more were considered to have an LTBI. RESULTS: The prevalence of LTBI among TB laboratory staff and low-risk HCWs was 24.83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.31 to 27.74%) and 14.82% (95% CI, 11.31 to 19.20%), respectively. No active TB cases were found in either group. After adjusting for potential confounders, TB laboratory staff were more likely to have an LTBI than low-risk HCWs (prevalence odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.17). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that LTBI are an occupational health problem among TB laboratory staff in Iran. This study reinforces the need to design and implement simple, effective, and affordable TB infection control programs in TB laboratories in Iran.
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Health Personnel
;
Humans
;
Infection Control
;
Iran*
;
Latent Tuberculosis*
;
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
;
Occupational Health
;
Odds Ratio
;
Prevalence*
;
Risk Factors
;
Skin Tests
;
Tuberculin
;
Tuberculin Test
;
Tuberculosis*