BACKGROUND/AIMS: Reflux esophagitis is a recurring condition for which many patients require maintenance therapy. This comparative, randomized multicenter study was designed to evaluate the effect of long-term maintenance treatment comparing proton pump inhibitor, rabeprazole and H2 receptor antagonist, ranitidine. METHODS: Eighty four patients with healed reflux esophagitis confirmed by endoscopy were randomly allocated to receive maintenance treatment with either rabeprazole 10 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg once daily for 32 weeks. Patients were seen every 8 weeks or at symptomatic relapse. RESULTS: Of 84 initially treated patients, 73 entered the maintenance study. The percentage of asymptomatic patients after 90-day and 210-day treatment were 97% and 81.5%, for rabeprazole and 74.3% and 62.3%, for ranitidine, respectively. After 32 weeks, the relapse rates of esophagitis were 21.3% in the rabeprazole group and 62.9% in the ranitidine group (RR: 0.405, 95% CI: 0.215-0.766). CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance treatment with rabeprazole (10 mg once daily) is superior to ranitidine (300 mg once daily) in keeping the patients with reflux esophagitis in remission over a 32 week period.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Adult ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/*therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles/*therapeutic use ; Esophagitis, Peptic/*drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Omeprazole/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Ranitidine/*therapeutic use

OBJECTIVE: To explore the mechanism, clinical characterization, diagnosis and therapeutic approach of vocal process granuloma(VPG) induced by gastroesophageal reflux. METHOD: We performed a retrospective review of 4 cases. RESULT: In 4 male cases, 3 cases had no obvious symptoms of stomach and esophagus and 1 case had symptoms of bloating and acid reflux. Additionally, 4 cases in which lesions were all located to the left side were diagnosed by trial therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with good responding. 2 of 4 cases were relapsed after operations. Meanwhile 4 patients were treated by Rabeprazole for acid suppression therapy and 3 cases were cured and 1 invalid case was cured by Pantoprazole. All patients were followed up for 4-48 months with no recurrence. CONCLUSION Gastroesophageal reflux is an important pathogenic factor to the VPG. The majority of patients with VPG do not have gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Besides, most lesions located in the left are associated with sleeping position. The diagnosis is mainly based on the laryngoscope examination and trial of acid suppression therapy. Moreover, recurrence risk is high-with simple operation in VPG therefore the main treatment is a antireflux and it is also valid by replacing byother PPI treatment. The treatment must be long enough. Meanwhile, the comprehensive treatment should be noticed.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; therapeutic use ; Arytenoid Cartilage ; pathology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; complications ; drug therapy ; Granuloma ; etiology ; Humans ; Male ; Pantoprazole ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVEOn the basic treatment, to observed the effect difference between acupuncture at Zhiyang (GV 9) points combined with pantoprazole and simple pantoprazole for gastroesophageal reflux cough with damp-heat type.

METHODSA total of 102 patients were randomly assigned into an observation group and a control group, 51 cases in each group. The patients in the two groups were given domperidone tablets (10 mg each time, 3 times a day). The patients in the control group were treated with pantoprazole capsule (40 mg each time, once a day). On the basis of the control group, the patients in the observation group were treated with Zhiyang (GV 9) points, once a day, 5 times a week. All the treatment was given for 8 weeks. The indexes were observed before and after treatment, including cough symptom at daytime and nighttime scores, TCM symptom (heartburn, acid regurgitation, chest pain, epigastric pain, throat discomfort) scores and quality of life scores of cough questionnaire in Leicester (physiological, psychological and social aspects). The clinical effects were compared.

RESULTSAfter treatment, the daytime and nighttime cough scores, TCM symptom (heartburn, acid regurgitation, chest pain, epigastric pain, throat discomfort) scores were lower, and the quality of life scores of cough questionnaire in Leicester (physiological, psychological and social aspects) were higher than those before treatment in the two groups (all <0.05), with better results in the observation group (all <0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group was 94.1% (48/51), which was better than 80.4% (41/51) of the control group (<0.05).

CONCLUSIONOn the basic treatment, acupuncture at Zhiyang (GV 9) points combined with pantoprazole can improve TCM symptoms, such as cough, of the patients with gastroesophageal reflux cough with damp-heat type, and improve their quality of life.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; therapeutic use ; Acupuncture Points ; Acupuncture Therapy ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Cough ; therapy ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; therapy ; Humans ; Pantoprazole ; Quality of Life ; Treatment Outcome

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been reported to have a higher bleeding rate than conventional methods. However, there are few reports on whether a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine2-receptor antagonist is the more effective treatment for preventing bleeding after ESD. In a prospective trial, patients undergoing ESD due to gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to pantoprazole or famotidine. Both drugs were given intravenously for the first 2 days, thereafter by mouth. Eighty-five in the pantoprazole group and 79 in the famotidine group were included for analysis. Primary outcome measure was the delayed bleeding rate. Clinical characteristics were not different between the two groups. The delayed bleeding rate was significantly lower in the pantoprazole group compared with the famotidine group (3.5% vs. 12.7%, p=0.031). On multivariate analysis, the preventive use of pantoprazole (relative hazard: 0.220, 95% CI: 0.051- 0.827, p=0.026) and the specimen size (> or =34 mm, relative hazard: 4.178, 95% CI: 1.229-14.197, p=0.022) were two independent factors predictive of delayed bleeding. There were no significant differences in en bloc and complete resection rate between the two groups. In conclusion, pantoprazole is more effective than famotidine for the prevention of delayed bleeding after ESD.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/*therapeutic use ; Aged ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/*therapeutic use ; Dissection ; Famotidine/*therapeutic use ; Female ; Gastric Mucosa/*surgery ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/*prevention & control ; *Gastroscopy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Hemorrhage/*prevention & control ; Prospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Stomach Neoplasms/*surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic condition, with 50-80% of patients experiencing recurrence within one year following completion of initial treatment. The present study aimed to estimate recurrence rate and treatment response in GERD patients treated with proton pump inhibitor. METHODS: A total of 207 symptomatic GERD patients, which were confirmed by endoscopy from July 2008 till January 2009, were enrolled. They were divided into non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group and erosive reflux disease (ERD) group by endoscopic findings. Patients were treated with lansoprazole 15 mg (NERD group) or 30 mg (ERD group) once daily for 8 weeks. The presence of symptoms was assessed in each patient at baseline and post-treatment using a questionnaire. Subsequent symptomatic recurrence on the cessation of therapy in each improved patients was checked by telephone survey or outpatient interview. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients and 113 patients were first diagnosed with NERD and ERD, respectively. The mean post-treatment follow-up period was 24.4+/-8.5 weeks. Recurrence rate was 40.0% (NERD, 43.8%; ERD, 37.1% (p=0.224)). Recurrence time was 10.1+/-5.8 weeks (NERD 9.6 weeks; ERD, 10.6 weeks (p=0.444)). Regarding the symptom improvement after 8 week therapy with lansoprazole, 89.4% (NERD, 85.1%; ERD, 92.9% (p=0.056)) of total patients were symptomatically improved. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percentage of GERD patients recurred within 6 months following the completion of 8 week therapy with lansoprazole. Recurrence rate, recurrence time, and rate of symptom improvement were not significantly different between NERD group treated with half dose and ERD group treated with full dose lansoprazole.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/*drug therapy ; Gastroscopy ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Questionnaires ; Recurrence

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Oxygen free radicals play an important role in acute pancreatitis. Pantoprazole as a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has pancreatic anti-secretory effect and a pronounced inhibitory reactivity towards hydroxyl radicals. The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of pantoprazole on the course of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized trial involving 40 patients with acute pancreatitis. Patients were divided into two groups. One group received PPI and the other group did not receive PPI. In the PPI group, patients received pantoprazole 40 mg intravenously twice a day for fasting time, and then 40 mg orally twice a day until discharge. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics and laboratory markers between two groups. In the pantoprazole group, mean hospital stay was 7.4 days, time to start oral intake was 69.0 hours, and time to pain relief was 59.7 hours. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score was 3.15 at admission day and 2.35 at discharge. On the other hand, in the non-pantoprazole group, mean hospital stay was 7.6 days, time taken to start oral intake was 71.4 hours, and time taken to pain relief was 61.8 hours. APACHE II score was 4.4 at admission and 2.85 at discharge. However, there were no significant differences between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with pantoprazole did not have influence on the clinical course of acute pancreatitis. But, considering it was a pilot study, large scale prospective trials will be needed.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use ; APACHE ; Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alcohol Drinking ; Eating ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Management ; Pancreatitis/*drug therapy/etiology ; Pilot Projects ; Prospective Studies ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/*therapeutic use ; Young Adult

The objective of the study was to document practice pattern of gastroenterologists for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) under the minimal influence of the insurance reimbursement guideline. Data on management for 1,197 consecutive patients with typical GERD symptoms were prospectively collected during 16 weeks. In order to minimize the influence of reimbursement guideline on the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), rabeprazole was used for the PPI treatment. A total of 861 patients (72%) underwent endoscopy before the start of treatment. PPIs were most commonly prescribed (87%). At the start of treatment, rabeprazole 20 mg daily was prescribed to 94% of the patients who received PPI treatment and 10 mg daily to the remaining 6%. At the third visits, rabeprazole 20 mg daily was prescribed to 70% of those who were followed and 10 mg daily for the remaining 30%. Continuous PPI treatment during the 16-week period was performed in 63% of the study patients. In conclusion, a full-dose PPI is preferred for the initial and maintenance treatment of GERD under the minimal influence of the insurance reimbursement guideline, which may reflect a high proportion of GERD patients requiring a long-term treatment of a full-dose PPI.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Enzyme Inhibitors ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gastroesophageal Reflux/*diagnosis/*drug therapy ; *Guideline Adherence ; Humans ; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement ; Male ; Middle Aged ; *Physician's Practice Patterns ; Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use ; Republic of Korea ; Treatment Outcome

Reversible thermal injury to the esophagus as the result of drinking hot liquids has been reported to generate alternating white and red linear mucosal bands, somewhat reminiscent of a candy cane. This phenomenon is associated with chest pain, dysphagia, odynophagia, and epigastric pain. Here, we report a case of thermal injury to the esophageal and oral cavity due to the drinking of hot tea, including odynophagia and dysphagia. A 69-year-old man was referred due to a difficulty in swallowing which had begun a week prior to referral. The patient, at the time of admission, was unable to swallow even liquids. He had recently suffered from hiccups, and had consumed five cups of hot adlay tea one week prior to admission, as a folk remedy for the hiccups. Upon physical examination, the patient's oral cavity evidenced mucosal erosion, hyperemia, and mucosa covered by a whitish pseudomembrane. Nonspecific findings were detected on the laboratory and radiological exams. Upper endoscopy revealed diffuse hyperemia, and erosions with thick and whitish pseudomembraneous mucosa on the entire esophagus. The stomach and duodenum appeared normal. We diagnosed the patient with thermal esophageal injury inflicted by the hot tea. He was treated with pantoprazole, 40 mg/day, for 14 days, and evidenced significant clinical and endoscopic improvement.
Tea/*adverse effects ; Mouth Mucosa/injuries ; Male ; Humans ; Heat/adverse effects ; Esophagus/*injuries ; Deglutition Disorders/*etiology ; Chest Pain ; Burns/drug therapy/*etiology/physiopathology ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use ; Aged ; 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/therapeutic use

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of sequential therapy with pantoprazole in patients with gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A total of 80 patients with GERD were double-blindedly randomized into 2 groups: 40 patients received sequential therapy with pantoprazole 40 mg injection, twice daily for 2 weeks, and then pantoprazole 40 mg oral administration,twice daily for 2 weeks; the other 40 patients received pantoprazole 40 mg oral administration alone,twice daily for 4 weeks. Doctors and patients recorded the severity and frequency of heartburn before and during the treatment. The curative effects of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The total effective rate in the sequential therapy group was higher than that of the oral administration group(95.0% vs 77.5%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION Pantoprazole sequential therapy is effective for GERD.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pantoprazole ; Proton Pump Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; therapeutic use

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of rabeprazole (proton-pump-inhibitor) and ranitidine (H2-receptor antagonist) in the symptom relief and treatment of erosive esophagitis diagnosed by endoscopy. METHODS: A total of 110 patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were enrolled in this multicenter study. They were randomized into rabeprazole group (53 patients) and ranitidine group (57 patients) respectively. The patients in rabeprazole group were given 10 mg of rabeprazole and ranitidine group received 300 mg of ranitidine before breakfast and dinner for 8 weeks. After the end of treatment, we evaluated the endoscopic healing rate of reflux esophagitis and symptomatic improvement. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of treatment, rabeprazole group showed significantly higher complete endoscopic cure rate than ranitidine group (86.8% [46/53] vs. 57.9% [33/57], p=0.001) and higher symptomatic improvement of heartburn (91.2% [31/34] vs. 76.2% [32/42], p=0.085), especially in the first 7 days (76.7% vs. 45.3%, p=0.008). Also, rabeprazole group showed significantly higher improvement of regurgitation symptom than ranitidine group (100% [35/35] vs. 83% [39/47], p=0.009). Both group showed no differences in the improvement of chest pain and globus sensation. All the adverse events (rabeprazole group 4 events vs. ranitidine group 3 events) were mild and there was no abnormality in laboratory test. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d. is superior to ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d. in healing of reflux esophagitis and resolving typical GERD symptoms. Rabeprazole is an effective and well-tolerated drug for GERD treatment.
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles ; Adult ; Anti-Ulcer Agents/*therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles/*therapeutic use ; Esophagitis, Peptic/*drug therapy ; Female ; Histamine H2 Antagonists/*therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Omeprazole/*analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use ; Proton Pumps/*antagonists & inhibitors ; Proton-Translocating ATPases/therapeutic use ; Ranitidine/*therapeutic use