2.Appreciations to Peer Reviewers in 2016: Contributions for the Scientific Community.
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017;32(2):166-172
No abstract available.
Peer Review*
3.The Korean Journal of Radiology Launches an Online Manuscript Submission and Tracking System for Peer Review.
Jung Eun CHEON ; Kyung Soo LEE
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 2005;53(3):157-157
No abstract available.
Peer Review*
5.Practice of a Web-Based Paper Submission and Review System of a "Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association".
Kyung Ryeol CHA ; Ju Han KIM ; Byoung Hoon OH
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2005;44(3):281-286
The procedure of the online paper submission to the Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association is consisted of seven steps:entering type, author, title, keyword and abstracts of the paper, author's affiliation, uploading the paper file, and completion of submission. Six steps before the completion of submission could be reversed. But after this, no change will be possible. When editor decide that the paper is eligible, correspondence author will get the acceptance letter. The review of the paper will be done by selective reviewers. They will login to the system for the evaluation. The efficacy and the convenience of this system will be heightened by user's feedback (ex, systemic error, inconvenience, improvements, and ideas).
Peer Review
6.Peer Review.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2010;31(3):169-170
No abstract available.
Peer Review
7.Peer Review System and Right to Reply.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2009;30(9):669-669
No abstract available.
Peer Review
8.Peer Review Guide and Peer Review Assessment.
Korean Journal of Family Medicine 2010;31(9):659-660
No abstract available.
Peer Review
9.Analysis of Publications on Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society in 2004.
Hyun Tai CHUNG ; Hee Jin YANG ; Ji Suk CHOI ; Dong Gyu KIM
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2004;36(6):510-513
The authors present an analysis of papers published on Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society(JKNS) in 2004. There were 217 peer reviewed articles. 118 were clinical articles, 78 were case reports, 17 were laboratory investigations, two were technical reports, and the other two were special articles. This distribution was not statistically different from 2003(p=0.53). Number of English articles was increased with statistical significance (p<0.001). There were 46 English clinical articles, 72 English case reports, nine English laboratory investigations, and so on. The trends in papers on JKNS in 2004 are thought to be desirable ones for JKNS to become an internationally evaluated journal.
Peer Review
10.Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.
Archives of Plastic Surgery 2017;44(3):177-178
No abstract available.
Peer Review*
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail