Introduction: Prostate cancer is a significant health problem worldwide. Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy has limitations in the detection of clinically significant disease, hence, new imaging including multiparametric MRI and MRI targeted biopsy is developed. In most centers, reading and contouring of the prostate and identification of significant lesions on MRI are performed by radiologists. In this institution, these steps are performed by a urologist. Objective: To determine the clinically significant cancer detection rate in patients undergoing MRI fusion-targeted and random systematic prostate biopsy where MRI PIRADS scoring, identification of lesions and contouring are performed by a trained urologist in a Philippine tertiary hospital. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of patients who underwent MRI fusion prostate biopsy in the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) from June 2021 to June 2023. Clinically significant cancer (csCancer) detection rates were calculated for MRI fusion prostate biopsy, random systematic prostate biopsy, and PIRADS scoring. Concordance was also determined between PIRADS scores and histopathological results. Results: Forty six (46) patients who underwent MRI fusion biopsy in PGH were included in the study, representing a total of 90 lesions identified by urologists using mpMRA with PIRADS scores of at least 3. Of the patients, 13 (14.4%) were diagnosed with csCancer, while a large proportion was diagnosed with benign prostatic tissue. The csCancer detection rate of MRI fusion biopsy was 28.3% (13/46) and 8.7% (4/46) for random biopsy. The csCancer detection rate was 11.1%, 14.6%, and 36.4% for PIRADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Conclusion The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer using MRI fusion-targeted prostate biopsy based on urologist-performed MRI reading and contouring was superior to random systematic approach. The positive predictive value of PIRADS scores when interpreted by urologists was lower compared to reported values in the literature and did not show concordance. This may reflect lowered thresholds for labeling prostate lesions as suspicious in urologists.
Prostatic Neoplasms