1.Benefits and risks of sugammadex.
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2015;68(1):1-2
No abstract available.
Risk Assessment*
2.Test of predictive validity for the new pressure risk assessment scale..
Kyung Sook CHOI ; Mi Soon SONG
Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing 1991;3(1):19-28
No abstract available.
Risk Assessment*
3.How to Assess Frailty: Role of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
Kwang Joon KIM ; Sang Bae LEE ; Chang Oh KIM
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(3):34-
No abstract available.
Geriatric Assessment
4.Risk of bias assessment: (9) Application of the risk of bias assessment results.
Y ZHANG ; Z R YANG ; F SUN ; S Y ZHAN
Chinese Journal of Epidemiology 2018;39(12):1648-1654
In this last paper of the series about risk of bias assessment, we introduce the application of risk of bias assessment results. Risk of bias assessment is one of the key steps in the assessment of quality of evidence. The risk of bias assessment results could be the "diagnosis" of individual studies, which helps decision making related to the inclusion and exclusion of individual studies, as well as the data analysis in the systematic review process. This paper focuses on how to incorporate risk of bias assessment results in the GRADE assessment for quality of evidence, including the principles and the tips for the application.
Bias
;
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
;
Risk Assessment
5.What do faculties need most in a faculty development program?.
Beag Ju NA ; Jaegu KANG ; Jong Yeup KIM ; Jungmin YUN ; Seungyeon HAN ; Wonmin HWANG ; Yera HUR
Korean Journal of Medical Education 2014;26(2):137-141
PURPOSE: This study examined two overarching topics: to what extent do faculties acknowledge class readiness, execution of lessons, and evaluation of the session; and what core content should be strengthened in a medical school faculty development program? METHODS: In November 2012, 37 faculties completed a detailed survey on the needs of medical school faculty development programs. The 14-item survey assessed the importance, operational frequency, difficulty in accomplishment, class readiness, execution of teaching, and evaluation of the session. RESULTS: Faculties were aware of the importance of class readiness, execution of teaching, and evaluation of the session but had a low level of accomplishment with regard to execution of the instruction and evaluation of the session. Four subitems of session evaluation were considered very important but showed low operational frequency, high difficulty in accomplishment, and low accomplishment ability. The successful discussion class item had the lowest operational frequency and accomplishment ability. The core contents that should be strengthened in medical school faculty development programs are diagnose students' class readiness (prior knowledge) (35.5%) and providing class session with suitable level/content (32.3%). CONCLUSION: Before designing faculty development programs, a needs assessment is useful in providing more tailored content for the faculty.
Needs Assessment
;
Schools, Medical
6.Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2005;48(1):9-14
No abstract available.
Geriatric Assessment*
;
Quality of Life
7.European Approaches to Work-Related Stress: A Critical Review on Risk Evaluation.
Silvia ZONI ; Roberto G LUCCHINI
Safety and Health at Work 2012;3(1):43-49
In recent years, various international organizations have raised awareness regarding psychosocial risks and work-related stress. European stakeholders have also taken action on these issues by producing important documents, such as position papers and government regulations, which are reviewed in this article. In particular, 4 European models that have been developed for the assessment and management of work-related stress are considered here. Although important advances have been made in the understanding of work-related stress, there are still gaps in the translation of this knowledge into effective practice at the enterprise level. There are additional problems regarding the methodology in the evaluation of work-related stress. The European models described in this article are based on holistic, global and participatory approaches, where the active role of and involvement of workers are always emphasized. The limitations of these models are in the lack of clarity on preventive intervention and, for two of them, the lack of instrument standardization for risk evaluation. The comparison among the European models to approach work-related stress, although with limitations and socio-cultural differences, offers the possibility for the development of a social dialogue that is important in defining the correct and practical methodology for work stress evaluation and prevention.
Government Regulation
;
Risk Assessment
8.The biomedical laboratory center
Journal of Medical Research 2001;15(2):50-52
The Biomedical Laboratory Center of Hanoi Medical University was established in January 17th 1997 and comprises 4 small labors: the functional tests; biochemical; immunology and genetic. According to its functions and tasks, the labor has human resources with the high technical and scientific levels. This resource originated from the faculties of Hanoi Medical University. This is an activity pattern which is suitable and convenient for staffs and students in the university.
Technology Assessment, Biomedical
;
Laboratories
10.Zero point survey: a multidisciplinary idea to STEP UP resuscitation effectiveness.
Cliff REID ; Peter BRINDLEY ; Chris HICKS ; Simon CARLEY ; Clare RICHMOND ; Michael LAURIA ; Scott WEINGART
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2018;5(3):139-143
The primary survey assessment is a cornerstone of resuscitation processes. The name itself implies that it is the first step in resuscitation. In this article, we argue that in an organized resuscitation the primary survey must be preceded by a series of steps to optimize safety and performance and set the stage for the execution of expert team behavior. Even in the most time critical situations, an effective team will optimize the environment, perform self-assessments of personal readiness and participate in a preemptive team brief. We call these processes the ‘zero point survey’ as it precedes the primary survey. This paper explains the rationale for the zero point survey and describes a structured approach designed to be suitable for all resuscitation situations.
Humans
;
Resuscitation*
;
Self-Assessment