Currently,China is confronted with the situation of high quality papers and low impact journals.Quality and quantity of English science,technology and medical(STM) journals in our country can not meet the publishing demand of scientific research papers,which becomes the inner boost of developing English STM journals.Along with the implementation of Project for Enhancing International Impact of China STM Journals,a growing number of STM journals launched international cooperation in journal publishing.This paper introduced Genes & Diseases' strategy of launching and managing English journals in cooperation with foreign publisher.Genes & Diseases strictly follows international publishing practice.The editorial office of Genes & Diseases fully aroused the enthusiasm of editors,editorial board members and the editor-in-chief to solicit manuscripts.Meanwhile,the office of Genes & Diseases took advantages of website,social media,Emails,meeting and academic activity,etc to promote the journals.All these experiences can be used as references for those intended or already started to lunch English STM journal.

The samples of experimental and control groups were obtained by 1 ∶ 1 matching method and divided into development (242 pairs) and sign (156 pairs) groups.Through a 10-month group and case type intervention,Gesell test was performed for 5 zone development quotients of large motor,fine motor,adaptability,speech and personal-social to determinate the effectiveness of interventions.Before intervention,t values of the development group were 1.07,1.42,0.78,0.62 and 1.67 while those of sign group-1.48,-1.96,1.82,1.78 and-1.73 respectively.The inter-group comparison of various developmental quotient differences had no statistical significance (P ＞ 0.05).After intervention,t values of the development group were 9.85,8.92,3.57,11.21 and 9.30 for inter-group comparison and-31.65,-36.94,-46.26,-37.56 and-49.85 for intra-group comparison.The results of sign group were 10.91,9.61,10.75,12.01 and 14.36 for inter-group comparison and-23.20,-31.75,-44.94,-33.58 and-54.58 for intra-group comparison.Between intra-group and inter-group,the comparison of the developmental quotient differences had statistical significance (P ＜ 0.01).In two experimental groups,the post-intervention developmental quotients in 5 zones are better than those pre-intervention levels.It shows that preventive intervention of infant mental health is effective.