Objective Toinvestigateserumalanineaminotransferase(ALT)andtotalbilirubin(TB)concentrationsofchildrenin Panyu district of Guangzhou ,and establish the reference ranges for ALT and TB tests for healthy children of different gender and different age .Methods 4 065 children were chosen randomly ,and their serum ALT and TB were determined .After excluding the outliers ,the results were analyzed statistically .Results After excluding outliers ,a total of 4 000 children were enrolled in the stud-y ,including 2 241 males ,1 759 females ,aged 2- <9 years old .According to statistical analysis ,reference ranges were established . For male the ALT reference ranges were as follows ,2- <3 years old :5 .0-36 .0 U/L ,3- <4 years old :7 .0-21 .0 U/L ,4- <8 years old :6 .0-21 .0 U/L ,8- <9 years old :5 .0-24 .0 U/L ;TB reference ranges of male were as follows ,2- <3 years old :3-12μmol/L ,3- <7 years old :4-15 μmol/L ,7- <8 years old :4-16 μmol/L ,8- <9 years old :7-12 μmol/L .ALT reference range of female were as follows ,2- <3 years old :6 .0-30 .0 U/L ,3- <4 years old:7 .0-22 .0 U/L ,4- <9 years old :6 .0-19 .0 U/L ;female TB reference range ,2- <3 years old :3 .0-12 .0 μmol/L ,3- <4 years old :3 .0-13 .0 μmol/L ,4- <9 years old:4 .0-16 . 0 μmol/L .Conclusion Established the reference ranges of ALT and TB test for healthy children in Panyu district .

Objective:To explore the outcomes of urethra around corpora cavernosus anastomotic urethroplasty for the treatment of complex posterior urethral strictures.Methods:Between June 2008 and June 2020, 35 patients with complex posterior urethral strictures were treated using urethra rerouted under one corpora cavernosus anastomotic urethroplasty. The patients’ age was 3-54 years(mean 23.2 years), the urethral stricture or loss length was 4-7 cm(mean 5.2 cm), and 6 patients associated with urethrorectal fistula. The technique involved: ①The anterior urethra is dissected long more than 5 cm, separation of the proximal corporeal bodies, inferior pubectomy and the dissected proximal urethra.②A channel around the left crus of the penis through the inferior pubectomy is separated and urethra rerouted under left corpora cavernosus to allow a tension-free anastomosis to the proximal urethra.Results:Two patients lost follow-up; the remainder 33 patients were followed-up for 3 to 144 months(mean 37 months). Thirty-two patients could void normally(97%), The examination of maximal urinary flow rates(Q max) were taken in 21 patients, of whom Q max was 13.6-35.5 ml/s (mean 17.5 ml/s) in 7 children and 16.3-77.6 ml/s(mean 27.9 ml/s) in 14 adult patients. All 6 patients associated with urethrorectal fistula successful repaired, of these patients 1 had died of hemorrhage of brain 6 years postop. One patient developed urethral stenosis postoperatively. Continence was achieved in 29 patients, the remaining 3 patients had incontinence from mild to moderate. Conclusions:Urethra rerouted under left corpora cavernosus anastomotic urethroplasty is not only an effective surgical salvage option, with low recurrent rate for patients with complex posterior urethral strictures, but also do not cause curve and affect growth of corpora cavernosus.

Objective:To investigate the prognostic factors of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) after radical resection with different surgical approaches.Methods:The retrospective case-control study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 442 patients who were admitted to Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from February 2003 to July 2011 were collected. There were 362 males and 80 females, aged from 21 to 85 years, with a median age of 64 years. Patients underwent radical resection of AEG. Observation indicators: (1) surgical situations; (2) follow-up; (3) progrostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection; (4) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach; (5) survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach; (6) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ type AEG; (7) survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG. Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect postoperative survival of patients up to June 2018. Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range). Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates and draw survival curves, and Log-rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was conducted using the COX proportional hazard model. Results:(1) Surgical situations: 442 patients underwent radical resection of AEG, including 204 via abdominal approach and 238 via thoracoabdominal approach. There were 391 patients with D 2 lymphadenectomy and 51 with D 2+ lymphadenectomy. (2) Follow-up: 442 patients were followed up for 8-162 months, with a median follow-up time of 37 months. All the 442 patients survived for 2-156 months, with a median survival time of 31 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were 79.2%, 42.0%, 30.0%, respectively. (3) Prognostic factors analysis of AEG after radical resection: results of univariate analysis showed that tumor diameter, Lauren type, pathological T staging, pathological N staging, pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( χ2=4.028, 4.885, 19.435, 17.014, 34.449, 9.707, 11.866, P<0.05). Results of multivariate analysis showed that pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration were independent influencing fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG ( hazard ratio=1.255, 0.486, 1.454, 95% confidence interval: 1.024-1.539, 0.325-0.728, 1.096-1.928, P<0.05). (4) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach: of the 204 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=1.854, P>0.05). (5) Survival of patients after radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach: of the 238 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, the 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.215, P>0.05). (6) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ AEG: of the 304 patients with Siewert typeⅡAEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 83.6%, 50.4%, 37.8% for 121 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.6%, 38.8%, 23.8% for 183 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=2.406, P>0.05). (7) Survival of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅲ AEG: of the 138 patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, the postoperative 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 72.0%, 39.3%, 31.8% for 83 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via abdominal approach, respectively, versus 79.1%, 37.6%, 29.3% for 55 patients undergoing radical resection of AEG via thoracoabdominal approach, showing no significant difference in the survival between the two groups ( χ2=0.640, P>0.05). Conclusions:Pathological TNM staging, lymphatic vessel invasion, and soft tissue infiltration are independent fators for prognosis of patients after radical resection of Siewert type Ⅱ and Ⅲ AEG. Siewert types and surgical approach are not related factors for prognosis of patients after radical resection of AEG. There is no significant difference in the survival between patients with different Siewert types of AEG undergoing radical resection via different surgical approaches.