Objective: To investigate the implementation of GBZ/T 201.3-2014 Radiation Shielding Specification for Radiotherapy Room--Part 3: Radiotherapy Room of γ-ray Sources (hereinafter referred to GBZ/T 201.3-2014). Methods: A total of 129 personnels, who were involved in the approval and supervision of radiation diagnosis and treatment construction projects in 19 provincial administrative agencies, engaged in radiation protection testing and evaluation of γ-ray radiotherapy rooms in radiation health technology service institutions, and used GBZ/T 201.3-2014 in other institutions (environmental impact assessment, education and scientific research), were selected as the participants using a stratified random sampling method. A questionnaire survey was conducted to assess their awareness and application of the standard. Results: The participants' awareness of GBZ/T 201.3-2014 was ≥63.6%, but the training rate was only 9.1% to 50.0%. The familiarity with the various chapters of the standard was over 86.4%. And 42.6% of the participants reported using the standard at least once a year. Regarding the applicability of the standard, all of the participants believed that the standard meets the needs of approval, supervision, testing, or evaluation, and adapts to the updated development of radiotherapy equipment and technology. And 94.6% of the participants believed that the use of the standard could improve the level of protection design and management, and 92.2% believed that the standard was widely applied. Regarding the adequacy of the standard, 97.7% of the participants believed that the standard's reference for ambient dose equivalent rate was reasonable, while 34.1% believed that the standard needs revision. Conclusion: The participants are satisfied with the standard and believe its applicability. They have a good level of awareness of the standard, but there is a room for improvement in their familiarity with the shielding calculation related content of the standard. The promotion, training, and practicality of the standard need to be strengthened.

Objective To explore the quality control results of Digital Diagnost digital radiography (DR), and also to analyze the differences in signal transfer characteristics (STP) of DR from different manufacturers, in order to provide a reference for quality control of testers and daily supervision of administrative staff. Methods According to WS 76—2020 “Specification for testing of quality control in medical X-ray diagnostic equipment”, the test items such as automatic exposure control (AEC) repeatability, AEC response, detector dose indication (DDI), STP, high-contrast resolution, and low-contrast resolution of Digital Diagnost DR were qualitatively controlled, and several common DRs on the market were selected to analyze their STP functional relationships. Results The baseline values of DDI, high-contrast resolution, and low-contrast resolution of Digital Diagnost DR were 19733, 2.8 Lp/mm, and H5 of image central pixel value, respectively; the quality control results of other test items met the requirements of WS 76—2020. The STP functional relationships of common DRs were mainly linear and logarithmic, but different models of DR from the same manufacturer might also have different STP functional relationships. Conclusion When testing some special test items of DR, attention should be paid to the influence of a variety of factors, while refining the test steps and condition settings for the test items. The simulation should be performed in accordance with the functional relationship provided by the manufacturer when analyzing the STP.

Objective To measure the peripheral dose distributions of the mobile head cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and evaluate the impact of CBCT on the surrounding personnel and environment, and provide data support for clinical radiation protection management. Methods Combined with the structural characteristics of CBCT, AT1123 was used in the direction of 0° (counterclockwise), 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270° and 315° in front of CBCT to measure the ambient dose equivalent rate of 30 cm, 80 cm and 130 cm away from the ground when the equipment was normally out of the beam, and the boundary of the temporary control area was drawn. At the same time, the dose level behind the lead screen 1 m away from the external surface of the equipment was measured and analyzed. Results The dose field around CBCT was symmetrically distributed with the dividing line of 0° and 180°, and the radiation dose level of 5.5 m in the direction of 0°, 3.5 m in the direction of 45°, 0.5 m in the direction of 90° and within 1.0 m in the direction of 180° (inside the "spoon" type) was higher than 2.5 μSv/h. The radiation dose levels of CT aperture 0° (straight forward), 45° and 315° behind the lead screen 1 m away from the equipment surface were 0.37 μSv/h, 0.22 μSv/h and 0.54 μSv/h, respectively. Conclusion The results show that the radiation dose around the mobile head cone beam CT is in a low dose level, the distribution of the dose field can provide necessary reference for the administrative and medical personnel to strengthen the radiation safety management. At the same time, it is suggested that lead screens should be set up in the clinical use of mobile CT to ensure the health and safety of the surrounding people and the environment.

Objective To track and evaluate the scientificity, applicability, and operability of the current implementation of the Radiation Shielding Specifications for Radiotherapy Treatment Rooms—Part 2: Radiotherapy Room of Electron Linear Accelerators (GBZ/T 201.2—2011) among personnel in medical radiation technology service institutions, and to provide scientific evidence for further improvement of the standard. Methods Following the Guidelines for Health Standards Tracking Evaluation Work (WS/T 536—2017) and the project implementation plan, a survey was conducted among 140 personnel engaged in shielding testing and evaluation of electron linear accelerator rooms in medical radiation technology service institutions from 24 provinces in China. The methods of pre-investigation, on-site research, mailing, and email were used to collect data for analysis. Results Questionnaires were completed by 140 respondents from 98 medical radiation service institutions, including 63 public institutions and 77 private institutions. Of the surveyed individuals, 86.68% claimed to have a good or very good understanding of the standard, while only 64.3% had participated in training related to the standard. The survey indicated a low level of mastery of the standard content among the personnel and insufficient efforts in training and dissemination. Although only 3.57% of the respondents considered the existing standard to be inapplicable in the context of new radiotherapy equipment and technological advancements, 95.71%, 93.57%, and 96.43% believed that shielding calculation examples should be added for tomotherapy devices, CyberKnife systems, and ring accelerators with self-shielding bodies. Furthermore, 65% of the respondents felt that neutron shielding should be considered for 10 MV X-ray accelerator rooms. Conclusion The GBZ/T 201.2—2011 has been widely used for radiation protection in radiotherapy. However, it is imperative to update this standard. Additionally, due to the technical complexity of the standard, it can be challenging for professionals to fully understand and implement it. Therefore, publicity goals should be tailored to different groups and the training of key personnel should be strengthened. A nationwide communication and cooperation mechanism should be established to ensure uniform implementation of the standard.

Objective To investigate the awareness of the Radiation Shielding Requirements for Radiotherapy Room–Part 2: Radiotherapy Room of Electron Linear Accelerators (GBZ/T 201.2—2011) among relevant practitioners in medical institutions as well as its implementation and application situation and collect relevant problems and suggestions for an evaluation of the scientificalness, standardization, and timeliness of the standard, and to provide a scientific basis for the further revision and implementation of the standard. Methods An online questionnaire survey was conducted among relevant employees in medical institutions providing medical linear accelerator radiotherapy across 22 provinces of China, which investigated the awareness, training, application, and revision suggestions related to GBZ/T 201.2—2011. The questionnaires were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 340 relevant practitioners filled out the questionnaire. Of the participants, 66.80% were physicists; 79.11% had an awareness of the standard; 56.18% ever participated in the standard-related training; but the survey results showed that the practitioners did not have a good knowledge of the standard’s content, and the training and promotion were not enough; 83.24% thought that the standard had been widely used; 17.60% thought that the standard needed to be revised; 76.76% thought that there was a need to add calculation examples; 88.82% thought that neutron shielding needed to be considered for the 10 MV X-ray accelerator room. Conclusion The standard has been widely known in the field of radiotherapy protection. With the development of radiotherapy technology, the standard should be revised to add calculation examples and consider neutron shielding in the 10 MV X-ray accelerator room. The standard is highly technical and difficult to grasp, so the promotion and implementation goals should be appropriate for different personnel groups, the training for employees at key posts should be strengthened, and the methods recommended in the standard should be uniformly used throughout the country.