1.Study on Quality Control Standard of Xinshuaining Mixture
Jun LUO ; Songbai SU ; Yuling HUA ; Hongmei WU ; Jianling ZHANG ; Zhuyin HE
Herald of Medicine 2015;(4):505-508
Objective To establish a method for quality control of xinshuaining mixture. Methods The herbal contents including red ginseng,milk veteh,root of red rooted salvia were identified by thin layer chromatography ( TLC) and the content of ginsenoside Rb1 in xinshuaining mixture was determined by high performance liquid chromatography ( HPLC ) . Results The herbs can be overtly identified by TLC. Ginsenoside Rb1 had a linear relationship in the range of 1. 095-5. 475μg, and the average recovery was 97. 3%(RSD 1. 98%). Conclusion The method is simple and rapid,and can be used for the quality control of xinshuaining mixture.
2.Tafamidis, a Noninvasive Therapy for Delaying Transthyretin Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yinan ZHAO ; Yanguo XIN ; Zhuyin SONG ; Zhiyi HE ; Wenyu HU
Journal of Clinical Neurology 2019;15(1):108-115
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tafamidis functions to delay the loss of function in transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP), which is a rare inherited amyloidosis with progressive sensorimotor and autonomic polyneuropathy. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of tafamidis in TTR-FAP patients, with the aim of improving the evidence-based medical evidence of this treatment option for TTP-FAP. METHODS: A systematic search of the English-language literature in five databases was performed through to May 31, 2018 by two reviewers who independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We extracted efficacy and safety outcomes and performed a meta-analysis. Statistical tests were performed to check for heterogeneity and publication bias. RESULTS: The meta-analysis identified six relevant studies. The tafamidis group showed smaller changes from baseline in the Neuropathy Impairment Score–Lower Limbs [mean difference (MD)=−3.01, 95% confidence interval (CI)=−3.26 to −2.75, p < 0.001] and the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy total quality of life score (MD=−6.67, 95% CI=−9.70 to −3.64, p < 0.001), and a higher modified body mass index (MD=72.45, 95% CI=69.41 to 75.49, p < 0.001), with no significant difference in total adverse events [odds ratio (OR)=0.69, 95% CI=0.35 to 1.35, p=0.27]. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between tafamidis and placebo treatment except for fatigue (OR=0.13, 95% CI=0.02 to 0.72, p=0.02) and hypesthesia (OR=0.16, 95% CI=0.03 to 0.92, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis has demonstrated that tafamidis delays neurologic progression and preserves a better nutritional status and the quality of life. The rates of adverse events did not differ between the patients in the tafamidis and placebo groups. Tafamidis might be a safer noninvasive option for patients with TTR-FAP.
Amyloid Neuropathies
;
Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial*
;
Amyloidosis
;
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Body Mass Index
;
Extremities
;
Fatigue
;
Humans
;
Hypesthesia
;
Incidence
;
Nutritional Status
;
Polyneuropathies
;
Population Characteristics
;
Prealbumin*
;
Publication Bias
;
Quality of Life