1.A clinical study of pacing in riht ventricular outflow tract
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy 2015;(5):737-739
Objective To compare the effects on cardiac function between pacings of right outflow tract ( RV-OT) and right vcntricular apex ( RVA) .Methods According to the digital table ,30 patients with high degree atrio-ventricular block which need for permanent pacemaker were randomly divided into the group RVA and group RVOT , 15 cases in each group ,and the DDD or VVI pacemaker was implanted .The programmable pacemakers was carried out,3,12 months after the operation.By Doppler ultrasound,the left and right ventricular synchronization time ,end diastolic diameter ( LVDd) ,left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF) was checked ,ECG QRS wave width ( QRSd) ,6 mi-nutes walking distance (6MWT) was examined.Results Followed up for 12 months,there was no shift,electrode dislocation and other complications .The left and right ventricular synchronization time of group RVOT [(59 ±10)ms] was significantly better that that in the RVA group [(80 ±11)ms](P<0.05).Following up,the EF[(60 ±4)%], LVDd[(45 ±6)mm],6MWT[440 ±10)m]in RVOT group after operation were better than [(48 ±5)%,(54 ±7) mm,(380 ±13)m](all P<0.05),the QRSd of RVOT group[(134 ±9)ms]was significantly shortened than that of group RVA[(186 ±20)ms](P<0.05).Conclusion RVOT septum pacing can be more effective in cardiac func-tion than RVA pacing .
2.Management of huge defects following extensive abdominal wall neoplasm resection: classification and immediate reconstruction
Jianjun YANG ; Zhicheng SONG ; Huichun WANG ; Zhiyuan ZHOU ; Haizhong HUO ; Dingquan GONG ; Yan GU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2016;31(9):728-731
Objective To evaluate the effect of extensive resection and immediate reconstruction based on classification of abdominal wall defects for patients with abdominal wall neoplasms.Methods From Jan 1999 to May 2016,112 patients with abdominal wall neoplasms were treated with extensive resection,including Type Ⅰ (n =20),Type Ⅱ (n =45) and Type Ⅲ (n =47).Immediate abdominal wall reconstruction comprised primary sutures or free skin graft for Type I defects,component separation (CST) with or without a prosthetic or biological mesh reinforcement for Type Ⅱ defects and pedicled or vascularized myocutaneous flap with or without a prosthetic or biological mesh or prosthetic + biological mesh with or without CST for Type Ⅲ defects.Results The average follow up was 76.86 ± 21.22 months,3 patients developed flap necrosis,9 patients suffered from wound infection.Local recurrence was observed in 20 patients,35 patients developed distant metastasis.Conclusions The optimal strategy based on the abdominal wall defect classification for immediate reconstruction of huge abdominal wall defects is safe and effective after resection of abdominal wall neoplasms.
3.The distribution of high pathogenicity island in multiple-drug-resiatance gram-negative bacilli and analyzation of DNA sequence
Jiehua JIANG ; Huo TAN ; Jun XU ; Weijiao LIAO ; Jianyun YI ; Huanzhu ZHANG ; Yiquan LI ; Guixing ZHENG ; Zhicheng XU ; Boping ZHU
Journal of Chinese Physician 2009;11(1):37-41
Objective To investigate the distribution of high pathogenicity island(HPI)in multiple-drug-resistance gram-negative bacilli and analyze the protein sequence.Methods To amplify thefyuA-irp2 gene cluster of the 84 isolates by multiple polymerase chain reaction(PCR),the product was subsequently sequenced.Results The positive rate ofirpl,irp2,irp3,irp4 and fyuA was 40.48%,41,67%,5.95%,O%and 16.67%,respectively.Theamino sequence offyuA comefromEC06748,Kp7151 and PAE7 was usedto compare with AL590842,there are 100%identities.Amino sequence ofirp2 come from Kp49 and Kp51 have 99%identities with AAA27636.1,but amino sequence of irp2 come from EC04 and EC07 only have 90%identities with 1176840.The GenBank accession number is FJ211852 and FJ211851.Amino sequence ofirpl come fromKp 10,Kp49 and Kp51 have 99%identities with AL590842。and amino sequence ofirp3 come from EC03,Kp51,Kp10 and Kp49 have 97%identities with CAA73128.There are the same mutation among the same species,and different mutation among different species.Conclusion There was different extant mutant lost in thefy~t-i,v2 gene cluster in multiple-drug-resistanee gram-negative bacilli.
4.Intra- and interobserver reproducibility in the assessment of coronary artery disease: evaluation with invasive coronary angiography and CT coronary angiography
Mingli SUN ; Bin Lü ; Runze WU ; Shiguo LI ; Zhicheng JING ; Lei HAN ; Yanmin HUO ; Fangfang YU ; Shiliang JIANG ; Ruping DAI ; Jianhua LU ; Zhihui HOU ; Yang GAO ; Huili CAO ; Yongjian WU ; Yuejin YANG ; Shubin QIAO
Chinese Journal of Radiology 2012;46(2):104-109
Objective To investigate the intra- and interobserver repeatability of coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and CT coronary angiography (CTCA).Methods Two readers with comparable experience ( over 10 years) independently evaluated ICA results of 42 consecutive patients with a blind method. After 30 days,one of them reviewed the same patients again.Another two comparable-experience (over 10 years) readers evaluated the results of CTCA (prospectively ECG-triggering) from the same 42 patients in the same way.The inter-reader and intra-reader repeatability of ICA and CTCA were analyzed by performing Kappa test and calculating the percentage of the segments with agreement on stenotic degree.Using ICA as reference,the accuracy of CTCA in diagnosing CAD was studied by comparing the area under ROC. Results The Kappa between readers for ICA and CTCA were 0.91 and 0.81.Intra-reader Kappa were 0.92 and 0.83 respectively (x2 =509.4 and 432.5,all P <0.01 ).The percentage of the segments with agreement between readers on the degree of stenosis were 80.8% (494/611) in ICA and 75.2% (469/624) in CTCA ( x2 =2.75,P =0.10),and within the same reader,86.9% (531/611)in ICA and 81.9% (511/624) in CTCA(x2 =3.76,P =0.053).With≥ 50%narrowing as a CAD diagnosis criterion,the agreement rates for two readers were 96.6% (590/611 ) in ICA and 94.4% (589/624) in CTCA( x2 =3.36,P =0.07),and for the same reader,97.4% (595/611) in ICA,95.4% (595/624) in CTCA ( x2 =3.62,P =0.06).Using ICA as reference,two readers of CTCA results achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% (530/624)and 98.1% (612/624).The area under ROC was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97).Conclusions Both ICA and CTCA demonstrate good repeatability in diagnosing CAD.The repeatability of ICA is superior to that of CTCA.A certain discrepancy exists in two readings from the same reader or two readers.