1.Prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio combined with tu-mor-associated neutrophils in patients with gastric cancer
Xiaopei HUANG ; Jiangbo ZHU ; Wenjun CHANG ; Xiaofang ZHANG ; Tianbao ZHANG ; Zhengchun KANG ; Wei XUE
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018;45(2):77-82
Objective:To investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)combined with tu-mor-associated neutrophils(TANs)in the stroma of gastric cancer tissues of patients.Methods:One hundred and twenty-six gastric cancer tissue samples from patients enrolled in Changhai hospital from June 2006 to May 2011 were divided into four groups accord-ing to NLRs in preoperative peripheral blood combined with high or low infiltration of neutrophils in gastric cancer tissues.The 5-year survival of the four groups was then compared,and their correlations with clinicopathologic features and prognosis were analyzed.Re-sults:High NLRs in peripheral blood combined with low infiltrating TANs in gastric tissues was associated with lower differential grade (P<0.001)and larger tumor size(P=0.026).Of the four groups,patients with high NLR in peripheral blood combined with low infiltrat-ing TANs in gastric cancer tissues demonstrated the lowest survival rates,whereas those with low NLR and high infiltrating TANs had highest survival rates, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that high NLR in peripheral blood combined with low infiltrating TANs in gastric cancer tissues(P<0.05)was an independent factor indicating poor prognosis.Conclusions:NLR in preoperative peripheral blood combined with infiltrating TANs in gastric cancer tissues can be used as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer,especially high NLR in preoperative peripheral blood com-bined with low infiltrating TANs in gastric cancer tissue indicates poor prognosis.
2.Evaluation of disinfection effect of high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection equipment in medical institution settings
Zhengchun SUN ; Jincai ZHU ; Tingting ZHU ; Xiaorong QU ; Nan LI ; Yuxin ZHAO ; Shuang WANG ; Xiaodong YUAN ; Guoliang LI ; Nengwei ZHANG ; Yi XING ; Qi YAO
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2024;58(6):857-861
Objective:To evaluate the disinfection effect of high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection equipment in medical institution settings.Methods:The disinfection effect was evaluated through field tests and laboratory tests. Among them, 135 high-frequency contact points were selected from nine departments in the field test. Samples were collected before and after disinfection, and the disinfection effects of 75% alcohol wipes wiping disinfection, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot disinfection and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were compared. In the laboratory test, 30 infected areas of the simulated test table were exposed to vertical ultraviolet irradiation and the bacterial-killing rate before and after disinfection was calculated.Results:In the field test, the bacteria-killing rates of 75% alcohol wipes, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were 94.99%, 91.53% and 95.94%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The disinfection effect of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument was better than that of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot ( P values <0.05). In the laboratory test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on the carrier were both greater than 3.00. In the simulated field test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus on the surface samples were 4.99. Conclusion:Both the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument and the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot have good disinfection effects, which are similar to the disinfection effects of conventional 75% alcohol wipes.
3.Evaluation of disinfection effect of high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection equipment in medical institution settings
Zhengchun SUN ; Jincai ZHU ; Tingting ZHU ; Xiaorong QU ; Nan LI ; Yuxin ZHAO ; Shuang WANG ; Xiaodong YUAN ; Guoliang LI ; Nengwei ZHANG ; Yi XING ; Qi YAO
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine 2024;58(6):857-861
Objective:To evaluate the disinfection effect of high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection equipment in medical institution settings.Methods:The disinfection effect was evaluated through field tests and laboratory tests. Among them, 135 high-frequency contact points were selected from nine departments in the field test. Samples were collected before and after disinfection, and the disinfection effects of 75% alcohol wipes wiping disinfection, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot disinfection and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were compared. In the laboratory test, 30 infected areas of the simulated test table were exposed to vertical ultraviolet irradiation and the bacterial-killing rate before and after disinfection was calculated.Results:In the field test, the bacteria-killing rates of 75% alcohol wipes, high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot and high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument were 94.99%, 91.53% and 95.94%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The disinfection effect of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument was better than that of the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot ( P values <0.05). In the laboratory test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli on the carrier were both greater than 3.00. In the simulated field test, the killing log value of Staphylococcus aureus on the surface samples were 4.99. Conclusion:Both the high-energy pulse ultraviolet handheld disinfection instrument and the high-energy pulse ultraviolet disinfection robot have good disinfection effects, which are similar to the disinfection effects of conventional 75% alcohol wipes.
4.The influence of LncRNA MEG3 in temozolomide resistance of glioma cells
Jun Zhu ; Zhengchun Zhu ; Xuejin Qin ; Di Zhang ; Yuqiao Xi ; Jia Li ; Fei Zhong
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui 2022;57(10):1621-1626,1632
Objective :
To explore the effect of LncRNA MEG3 in temozolomide (TMZ) resistance of glioma cells.
Methods :
TMZ⁃resistant glioma cells U87(U87/TMZ) were constructed,qRT⁃PCR was used to detect the LncRNA
MEG3 expression level, and MTT was used to detect the cell proliferation ability. The LncRNA MEG3 in U87/TMZ was overexpressed by liposome method (pcDNA⁃MEG3 group), the empty vector was transfected as the empty vector group ( pcDNA group), and the conventionally cultured U87/TMZ was used as the blank group ( Control group),then treated with 10 μg/ml TMZ. The plasmid transfection effect was analyzed by qRT⁃PCR. The expression of LncRNA MEG3⁃related protein was confirmed by Western blot. The cell cloning experiment detects the effect of LncRNA MEG3 on cell proliferation. The effect of LncRNA MEG3 on cell invasion was tested by Transwell. The effect of LncRNA MEG3 on cell apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. And mouse transplant tumoranimal model was constructed for in vivo experiments.
Results :
Compared with U87, the expression level of Ln cRNA MEG3 in U87/TMZ was lower (P < 0. 01), and the cell viability of U87/TMZ was higher than that of U87 (P < 0. 01) . After overexpression of MEG3 combined with TMZ, compared with the Control group and the pcDNA group, the pcDNA⁃MEG3 group up⁃regulated the expression of MEG3 mRNA and p53 protein, and down⁃regulated the expression of MDM2 protein, and the proliferation and invasion ability of the pcDNA⁃MEG3 group decreased while the apoptosis ability increased (P < 0. 01) . The construction of mouse transplant tumor animal model showed that the tumor volume and mass of the pcDNA⁃MEG3 group were reduced compared with the pcDNA group (P < 0. 01) .
Conclusion
Overexpression of LncRNA MEG3 can attenuate the drug resistance of TMZ⁃resistant glioma cells.