The work of hospital management and evaluation began in 1991 in Shangtung.Up till 1995,the first phase has basically ended.From the three years of hospital evaluation,we find the prob- lems of superficial understanding of evaluation rules,hasty preparation of materials,etc.To solve the- seproblems,relevant documents must be well studied and hurried work avoided.Key points must be grasped with the guiding principle kept in mind.Defunct ideas must be scrapped with new ideas put into practice.A scientific evaluation is to render the evaluation conclusions authoritative and viable.Super- vision must be tightened.The point for evaluation is quality to.solve the problems of quality control and the monitoring of case history and illness specification.

Objective    To explore the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and aortic dissection (AD). Methods    Fifty three patients with AD diagnosed by CTA in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2018 were selected. All the patients with AD were scored by the STOP-BANG questionnaire. The patients who scored more than or equal to 3 received polysomnography (PSG) after surgical or conservative treatment, and according to whether the sleep apnea-hypopnea index was higher than or equal to 5. Fifty-three patients were divided into an OSAHS group and a non OSAHS group. Results    There were 18 patients with 17 males and 1 female at average age of 43.3±8.4 years in the OSAHS group, and 35 patients with 23 males and 12 females at average age of 56.6±12.9 years in the non OSAHS group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the Stanford classification of aortic dissection, the time of onset, personal history, the history of diabetes, coronary heart disease and hyperlipidemia, or post-treatment systolic/diastolic blood pressure before sleep (P>0.05). The age of patients in the OSAHS group was significantly less than that in the non OSAHS group (P<0.01), the proportion of men/women (P=0.021), weight (P<0.01), height (P=0.028), body mass index (P<0.01), and post-treatment systolic/diastolic blood pressure after waking up (P=0.028,P=0.044) in the OSAHS group were significantly higher than those in the non OSAHS group. In the OSAHS group, the proportion of previous hypertension was significantly higher than that in the non OSAHS group (P=0.042).   Conclusion    AD patients combined with OSAHS are mostly male patients. The number of young and high-fat people is significantly more than that in the non OSAHS group. OSAHS may be one of the risk factors for young, high-fat men with AD.