1.Clinical application of a micro-array for multi-tumor marker detection
Xiaopeng LAN ; Meng ZHAO ; Liqiang MA ; Zhaoqing XUE
Journal of Medical Postgraduates 2003;0(08):-
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of a micro-array for multi-tumor marker detection (abbreviate C-12 system in the following) in four kinds of tumors (lung, liver, pancreas/colon and stomach cancers). Methods:30 lung cancer?19 liver cancer?24 pancreas/colon?22 stomach cancer and 173 non-tumor patients' serum were detected by C-12 system, and the results were analyzed by ROC curve.Results:There is no difference in the positive rate of single TM between C-12 system and the previously reports; The positive rate and the mean positive value of tumor patients were both obviously higher than that of non-tumor patients (P
2.Mechanism of Modified Liuwei Dihuangtang in Bone Protection of CKD-MBD Model Rats: An Exploration Based on Klotho-FGF23 Axis
Hua-hui GUO ; Mei-dan LI ; Ren-fa HUANG ; Qun-qing LIANG ; He-sheng LI ; Xue-pin LIU ; Ruo-lin WANG ; Si-heng SHEN
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae 2021;27(24):61-70
Objective:To observe the effects of modified Liuwei Dihuangtang on serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), full-length intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3] levels and Klotho and FGF23 protein expression in renal and bone tissues of rats exposed to high phosphorus combined with adenine, so as to explore the mechanism of modified Liuwei Dihuangtang against renal osteopathy. Method:One hundred and thirty healthy adult SD rats were randomly divided into five groups, namely normal group(
3.NE activates Nrf2/HO⁃1 signaling pathway to regulate oxidative stress in human endometrial epithelial cells
Xue Yang ; Ruixin Ma ; Jiaxin Li ; Xuerui Kong ; Junping Li ; Yan Luo
Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui 2024;59(5):767-773
Objective :
To investigate whether norepinephrine (NE) regulates the oxidative stress in human endometrial epithelial cells (hEECs) by activating nuclear factor E2⁃related factor 2(Nrf2)/ heme oxygenase ⁃1(HO⁃1) signal pathway.
Methods :
C ultured hEECs were used. The expression of α and β adrenergic receptors was detected by reverse transcription⁃polymerase chain reaction (RT⁃PCR) . Cell counting kit ⁃8(CCK⁃8) assay was applied to test the effect of NE on cell viability , then the cells were divided into C ontrol group and NE treatment group , and the appropriate concentrations were chosen. The expression of tight j unction proteins Occludin and zona occludens-1 (ZO⁃1) , apoptosis⁃related proteins apoptosis⁃related protein B ⁃cell lymphoma⁃2 protein(Bcl ⁃2) and Bcl ⁃2 associated X protein(Bax) , antioxidant proteins Nrf2 and HO⁃1 were examined by Western blot. The apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry. The malonaldehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase(SOD) in the cell culture medium were detected by enzyme⁃linked immunosorbent assays kit ( ELISA) .
Results :
The mRNA expression of α1 a ,α1 b , α2 a , α2 b , α2 c , β1 , β3 was detected in the hEECs. After the NE treatment , no significant change in cell viability was ob served in low concentration (5 μmol/L and 10 μmol/L) groups , while 15 μmol/L and 20 μmol/L NE treatments for 6 h or 24 h promoted the cell viability significantly. The expression of ZO⁃1 and Occludin increased significantly in 15 μmol/L group after 24 h treatment , the expression of ZO⁃1 decreased in 6 h treatment group , significant down regulation was ob served after 15 μmol/L NE application , the expression of Occludin increased in 6 h group. The cell apoptosis increased compared with the control group after NE stimulation , espeserved after 24 h treatment. The ration of Bcl ⁃2/Bax > 1 . The expression of Nrf2 and HO⁃1 was elevated by NE. There was no obvious change in MDA level while significant elevation in SOD was detected in cell culture medium.
Conclusion
Nrf2/H0-1 signal is activated after application of NE to the hEECs, which may responsible for the
upregulation of SOD, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effect in the hEECs.
4.Prognosis and influencing factors analysis of patients with initially resectable gastric cancer liver metastasis who were treated by different modalities: a nationwide, multicenter clinical study
Li LI ; Yunhe GAO ; Liang SHANG ; Zhaoqing TANG ; Kan XUE ; Jiang YU ; Yanrui LIANG ; Zirui HE ; Bin KE ; Hualong ZHENG ; Hua HUANG ; Jianping XIONG ; Zhongyuan HE ; Jiyang LI ; Tingting LU ; Qiying SONG ; Shihe LIU ; Hongqing XI ; Yun TANG ; Zhi QIAO ; Han LIANG ; Jiafu JI ; Lin CHEN
Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery 2024;23(1):114-124
Objective:To investigate the prognosis of patients with initially resectable gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) who were treated by different modalities, and analyze the influencing factors for prognosis of patients.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinicopathological data of 327 patients with initially resectable GCLM who were included in the database of a nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study on GCLM based on real-world data from January 2010 to December 2019 were collected. There were 267 males and 60 females, aged 61(54,68)years. According to the specific situations of patients, treatment modalities included radical surgery combined with systemic treatment, palliative surgery combined with systemic treatment, and systemic treatment alone. Observation indicators: (1) clinical characteristics of patients who were treated by different modalities; (2) prognostic outcomes of patients who were treated by different modalities; (3) analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM; (4) screening of potential beneficiaries in patients who were treated by radical surgery plus systemic treatment and patients who were treated by palliative surgery plus systemic treatment. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was conducted using the independent sample t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M( Q1, Q3), and comparison between groups was conducted using the rank sum test. Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rate and draw survival curve, and Log-Rank test was used for survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using the COX proportional hazard regression model. The propensity score matching was employed by the 1:1 nearest neighbor matching method with a caliper value of 0.1. The forest plots were utilized to evaluate potential benefits of diverse surgical combined with systemic treatments within the population. Results:(1) Clinical characteristics of patients who were treated by different modalities. Of 327 patients, there were 118 cases undergoing radical surgery plus systemic treatment, 164 cases undergoing palliative surgery plus systemic treatment, and 45 cases undergoing systemic treatment alone. There were significant differences in smoking, drinking, site of primary gastric tumor, diameter of primary gastric tumor, site of liver metastasis, and metastatic interval among the three groups of patients ( P<0.05). (2) Prognostic outcomes of patients who were treated by different modalities. The median overall survival time of the 327 pati-ents was 19.9 months (95% confidence interval as 14.9-24.9 months), with 1-, 3-year overall survival rate of 61.3%, 32.7%, respectively. The 1-year overall survival rates of patients undergoing radical surgery plus systemic treatment, palliative surgery plus systemic treatment and systemic treatment alone were 68.3%, 63.1%, 30.6%, and the 3-year overall survival rates were 41.1%, 29.9%, 11.9%, showing a significant difference in overall survival rate among the three groups of patients ( χ2=19.46, P<0.05). Results of further analysis showed that there was a significant difference in overall survival rate between patients undergoing radical surgery plus systemic treatment and patients undergoing systemic treatment alone ( hazard ratio=0.40, 95% confidence interval as 0.26-0.61, P<0.05), between patients undergoing palliative surgery plus systemic treatment and patients under-going systemic treatment alone ( hazard ratio=0.47, 95% confidence interval as 0.32-0.71, P<0.05). (3) Analysis of influencing factors for prognosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM. Results of multivariate analysis showed that the larger primary gastric tumor, poorly differentiated tumor, larger liver metastasis, multiple hepatic metastases were independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM ( hazard ratio=1.20, 1.70, 1.20, 2.06, 95% confidence interval as 1.14-1.27, 1.25-2.31, 1.04-1.42, 1.45-2.92, P<0.05) and immunotherapy or targeted therapy, the treatment modality of radical or palliative surgery plus systemic therapy were independent protective factors for prognosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM ( hazard ratio=0.60, 0.39, 0.46, 95% confidence interval as 0.42-0.87, 0.25-0.60, 0.30-0.70, P<0.05). (4) Screening of potentinal beneficiaries in patients who were treated by radical surgery plus systemic treatment and patients who were treated by palliative surgery plus systemic treatment. Results of forest plots analysis showed that for patients with high-moderate differentiated GCLM and patients with liver metastasis located in the left liver, the overall survival rate of patients undergoing radical surgery plus systemic treatment was better than patients undergoing palliative surgery plus systemic treatment ( hazard ratio=0.21, 0.42, 95% confidence interval as 0.09-0.48, 0.23-0.78, P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared to systemic therapy alone, both radical and palliative surgery plus systemic therapy can improve the pro-gnosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM. The larger primary gastric tumor, poorly differen-tiated tumor, larger liver metastasis, multiple hepatic metastases are independent risk factors for prognosis of patients with initial resectable GCLM and immunotherapy or targeted therapy, the treatment modality of radical or palliative surgery plus systemic therapy are independent protective factors for prognosis of patients with initially resectable GCLM.