2.COMPARATIVE INVIVO OVICIDAL EFFECT OF ALBENDAZOLE AND MEBENDAZOLE ON HOOKWORM EGGS AND IN THE TREATMENT OF INTESTINAL NEMATODE INFECTIONS
Peng GAO ; Yuehan LIU ; Xiaogen WANG ; Qinan WANG ; Licongzhi ; Zhaobin GUO ; Qun SHU ;
Journal of Chongqing Medical University 1986;0(02):-
Albendazole and mebendazole were comparatively evaluated in 22 adult patients for their in vivo effects on hookworm eggs. Both drugs were given 200mg twice daily for three consecutive days. Stool specimens wore collected before treatment and during the following five days. The Stool egg count was carried out by Stolls method and each specimen was also cultured by Hara-da-Mori technique for at least eight days. The mean pre-treatment percentage of incubated hookworm eggs that developed to larvae was 75.3% in albendazole group and 68.8% in mebendazole group respectively. One day following the initiation of treatment the mean percentage was remarkably reduced to 0.25% in albeadaole group and no eggs developed to larval stage beyond day 1. 0ne day and two days following the initiation of treatment the mean percentage was 16.23% and 23.13% respectively in mebendazole group. No eggs developed to larval stage on day 3 and thereafter. Albendazole seems to have better ovicidal effect than mebendazole.Albendazole and mebendazole were also comparatively evaluated in 123 adult patients with single or mixed infections of hookworm, ascarisis, and trichuris. A single dose of 400mg was used for both drugs. 2 and 4 weeks after treatment, their stools were examined by brine flotation technique. The hookworm eggs negative conversion ratss 2 weeks after treatment were 78.8% and 26.4% respectively in albeadazole and mebendazole group; while those 4 weeks after treatment were 74.1% and 25.5% respectivley. For ascariasis, the eggs negative conversion rates were 98.0% and 92.0% respectively. For trichuriasis, the negative conversion rates were only 20.6% and 27.7% respectively
3.Swim-up and density gradient centrifugation preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: A systematic review
Tao LI ; Qinghua GUO ; Jinhui TIAN ; Wei ZHANG ; Baihong GUO ; Guoping LI ; Nengqin LUO ; Zhaobin LI ; Lei JIANG ; Wenqin JIA ; Renju LI ; Peng ZHANG ; Yirong CHEN
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 2010;14(18):3310-3313
BACKGROUND: There are many in vitro selection method of sperm, and swim-up and density gradient centrifugation are commonly used. It remains unclear which method minimizes bad stimulation to the sperm and select sperm with high fertilization potential. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of swim-up and gradient centrifugation preparation techniques on intrauterine insemination (IUI).METHODS: A computer-based online search of Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE databases was performed, and some related journals were manually searched for related articles published between January 1966 and February 2009. The quality of included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and q-randomized trials (Q-RCT) was evaluated and Meta-analysis was conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan5.0. Experts.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 6 studies were included, involving 4 RCTs and 2 Q-RCTs. A total of 486 patients (1 099 IUI cycles) were enrolled. The Meta-analysis indicated that there was no difference between swim-up and gradient centrifugation preparation techniques for the IUI in terms of cycle pregnancy rates [OR = 1.11, 95%CI(0.8,1.55)], miscarriage rates [OR = 0.31, 95%CI(0.09,1.04)], sperm count [the weight mean difference (WMD) =-0.89, 95%CI(-14.17,12.38)], sperm motility [WMD = -2.31, 95%CI(-7.27,2.65)]. There is insufficient evidence to confirm which is the best method in the two specific preparation techniques. The quality of study methods should be improved. And more measure parameters should be included when comparing it before or after treatment, such as sperm motility, sperm count, sperm function.