1.Experiential practice in assistance during an overnight tour for patients with Parkinson's disease
Tomoya TSUCHIHASHI ; Yuya OKAZAKI ; Takuzo HANO ; Toshiyuki KURIYAMA ; Tetsuya KAWABE ; Tatsuya TAKESHITA
Medical Education 2010;41(1):23-28
1) The Department of Tourism Medicine was established at Wakayama Medical University in 2006. "Health tourism," a project of the department combining sightseeing with health care, has involved patients with a variety of diseases.
2) As a part of training to promote the compassionate care of patients, students participated in an overnight tour for patients with Parkinson's disease and kept the patients company all the time with various types of assistance.
3) The students could understand the daily condition of patients with Parkinson's disease, which they could not do in the hospital, and had favorable relations with the patients' families. This experiential practice was an effective means for promoting the compassionate care of patients.
2.Meniscal Extrusion Progresses Shortly after the Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear
Takayuki FURUMATSU ; Yuya KODAMA ; Yusuke KAMATSUKI ; Tomohito HINO ; Yoshiki OKAZAKI ; Toshifumi OZAKI
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2017;29(4):295-301
PURPOSE: Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT) induce medial meniscus extrusion (MME). However, the time-dependent extent of MME in patients suffering from the MMPRT remains unclear. This study evaluated the extent of MME after painful popping events that occurred at the onset of the MMPRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients who had an episode of posteromedial painful popping were investigated. All the patients were diagnosed as having an MMPRT by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 12 months after painful popping. Medial meniscus body width (MMBW), absolute MME, and relative MME (100×absolute MME/MMBW) were assessed among three groups divided according to the time after painful popping events: early period ( < 1 month), subacute period (1–3 months), and chronic period (4–12 months). RESULTS: In the early period, absolute and relative MMEs were 3.0 mm and 32.7%, respectively. Absolute MME increased up to 4.2 mm and 5.8 mm during the subacute and chronic periods, respectively. Relative MME also progressed to 49.2% and 60.3% in the subacute and chronic periods, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that absolute and relative MMEs increased progressively within the short period after the onset of symptomatic MMPRT. Our results suggest that early diagnosis of an MMPRT may be important to prevent progression of MME following the MMPRT.
Early Diagnosis
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Menisci, Tibial
;
Tears
3.The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
Takayuki FURUMATSU ; Yuki OKAZAKI ; Yuya KODAMA ; Yoshiki OKAZAKI ; Yusuke KAMATSUKI ; Shin MASUDA ; Takaaki HIRANAKA ; Toshifumi OZAKI
The Journal of Korean Knee Society 2019;31(3):e7-
PURPOSE:
Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada's measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated.
RESULTS:
The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455).
CONCLUSIONS
The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV