BACKGROUND:Vacuum sealing drainage is currently considered as a safe and effective for fasciotomy wounds in the treatment of compartment syndrome. But the wounds after treatment are often not self-closed, which needs skin grafts that can cause secondary injury. Studies have shown that shoelaces technology is useful for leg fasciotomy wounds in the surgical treatment of lower leg compartment syndrome, but so far there are few domestic reports. OBJECTIVE:To compare the vacuum sealing drainage and shoelace technique for treatment of leg fasciotomy wounds. METHODS:A total of 36 patients, with 46 leg fasciotomy wounds, were randomized into vacuum sealing drainage and shoelace technique groups, 23 wounds in each group. In the vacuum sealing drainage group, patients were subjected to vacuum sealing drainage after fasciotomy based on fracture reduction and external fixation;in the shoelace technique group, the fasciotomy wounds were covered with polyethylene/ethanol hydrated seaweed salt foam fol owed by shoelace technique. After 1 month, wound size, wound closure time, infection, further intervention and daily treatment cost were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Wound closure time was significantly higher in the vacuum sealing drainage group compared to the shoelace technique group (P < 0.05). Eight wounds in the vacuum sealing drainage group required skin grafts; while, no skin graft was necessary in the shoelace technique group. In the shoelace technique group, the vessel loops had to be replaced in five wounds. There was no wound infection, increased compartment pressure and skin flap necrosis postoperatively in both two groups. Both vacuum sealing drainage and the shoelace technique are safe, reliable and effective methods for closure of leg fasciotomy wounds. Vacuum sealing drainage requires longer time to definite wound closure and is far more expensive than the shoelace technique, especially when additional skin grafting is required.