Septic pulmonary embolism is a rare condition, the common sources of which are bacterial endocarditis and infected venous catheters. Septic pulmonary embolism ascribed to dental infection is extremely rare. The present report describes a case of septic pulmonary embolism attributed to periapical periodontitis in a 39-year-old patient, who was admitted with persistent toothache, fever, and chest pain. Chest CT showed a feeding vessel sign and a target sign. A panoramic radiograph of the left maxillary bone showed alveolar bone loss in a horizontal pattern typical of periodontitis and periapical periodontitis. The patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics and teeth extraction. To our knowledge, only 4 cases of septic pulmonary embolism ascribed to dental infection have been reported in the English literature. These patients repeatedly developed dental infections but did not receive appropriate dental treatment including extraction of the causative teeth, leading to the development of septic pulmonary embolism. This paper may contribute to the limited clinical knowledge base regarding septic pulmonary embolism ascribed to periapical periodontitis. Effective oral care and removal of the primary source of infection, including extraction of the causative teeth, are important to prevent septic pulmonary embolism.

The primary aim of this study was to describe how patient-held-records was used in the regional palliative care program (OPTIM-study). The number of patient-held-records disseminated was 1,131 per region per year. A total of 15% and 16% of 706 physicians and 2,236 nurses in the region reported that they used patient-held-records disseminated during the study periods, respectively. In-depth interview identified themes [difficulty in dissemination], potential benefits of patient-held-records ([improved sense-of-control of patients], [improved information sharing among health care professionals]), and barriers ([lack of patient-perceived benefits and patient burden], [necessity that all health care professionals involved should be aware the value of patient-held-records and understand how to use it]). Of 11 hospitals who introduced patient-held-records, only 2 hospitals continued to use it during 3-year study periods. In conclusion, region-wide dissemination of patient-held-records seems to be unfeasible in many regions in Japan.