Introduction. The principal therapy for gallstones was open cholecystectomy. Recently, however, with remarkable advances in laparoscopic surgery on the biliary tract in particular, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become preferred treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. To assess our experience in surgical treatment for gallstones and determine the best method to reduce postoperative discomfort, cases of cholecystectomy performed in our institution were reviewed.
Patients.-During the past 14 years, 524 patients were treated for cholelithiasis (cholecystolithiasisin 412, choledocho-cholecystolithiasis in 75, choledocholithiasis in 36, intrahepatic stones in 1). The ratio of men to women was 1: 1.7 and the average age was 61 years. Results.-Only cholecystectomy was performed on 86% of the patients with cholecystolithiasis and 91% had accompaning open surgery with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in latest years. Open cholecystectomy by inserting a T tube was done on 61% of choledochocholecystolithiasis cases. In some cases papilloplasty and/or choledochoduodeno or choledochojejunostomy followed. Almost all patients with choledocholithiasis had open cholecystectomy with T-tube insertion and additional procedures to remove stones in thebiliary tract in earlier years. In these years, no more addidional procedures except for choledochotomy with T-tube insertion had been performed in any cholelithiasis cases.
Conclusions.-Laparoscopic cholencystetomy is a safe and effective procedure and should be preferred for symptomatic cholelithiasis except for cases with acute cholecystitis, common bile duct stones, gallbladder cancer and other severe complications.

Objectives : Many reports have investigated the work environment of physicians and reported the association between work environment, burnout, and the quality of medical care. We aimed to determine the key to improving the work environment by analyzing the results of a Japanese survey for young cardiovascular surgeons. Methods : A survey on work environment was performed among the young members of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery (≤40 years of age) to measure their job satisfaction for 9 items : operation, perioperative work, number of hours working or sleeping, board affairs (application or renewal of board certification), motivation, salary, days off, quality of life, and mental status. Univariate and multivariate analyses using 16 factors for the work environment (age, number of years in practice, gender, subspecialty, board certification in surgery, board certification in cardiovascular surgery, primary practice hospital, workdays and nights on duty in a primary practice setting, workdays and nights on duty outside primary practice, total annual income, overtime work hours, overtime entitlement, gap in overtime work and entitlement, and presence of an intensive care unit [ICU] managed by ICU physicians) were performed to identify the risk factors for dissatisfaction. Results : The survey was completed by 327 of 1,304 (25.1% response rate) young members of the Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. The respondents had an average of 8.5±3.5 years in practice, and 292 (89.3%) respondents were male. Only 14.2% of the responding young surgeons reported no dissatisfaction in any items. In all items, the young surgeons were most satisfied with operation (34.6% of all responders). Age, years in practice, female gender, board certification in surgery, working at a university hospital, workdays in a primary practice setting, and workdays outside a primary practice setting were identified as significant factors for dissatisfaction, while a subspecialty in vascular surgery, total annual income, board certification in cardiovascular surgery, and the presence of an ICU managed by ICU physicians were identified as significant factors against dissatisfaction in the work environment. Conclusions : Our analyses of the survey results identified a number of risk factors for dissatisfaction in the work environment among young cardiovascular surgeons. Regarding the quality of medical care, respondents hoped for a reduced burden on surgeons and the establishment of a work-shift system in the cardiovascular department and an interdisciplinary team including an ICU physician. Multidimensional analyses including job satisfaction, rewards as training, and a quantitative evaluation of the quality of medical care will be necessary to clarify the corresponding relationship between consumers and providers of cardiovascular surgery in the work environment.