Adjuvant analgesics refer to a group of drugs that are used not only to treat certain diseases but also to induce analge-sia. Such drugs demonstrate different mechanisms based on the complexity of cancer pain. Thus, opioids, nonsteroidal drugs, and adju-vant analgesics are often combined to control cancer pain. According to the WHO three-step analgesic ladder, adjuvant analgesics can be used at any cancer stage, and the usage of these drugs combined with opioids can reduce the required dosages of these pain relievers, thereby alleviating the adverse reactions associated with opioid use. Moreover, these drugs are particularly suitable for neuropathic pain patients who are not fully sensitive to opioids. The commonly used adjuvant analgesics include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, local administration drugs, corticosteroids, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. Various adjuvant analgesics also differ in usage and dosage based on primary disease treatment. Therefore, clinical doctors should determine the adverse reactions, proper dos-age, and subsequent amount of dosage to be added in a few days or weeks to achieve balance between the desired effect and adverse re-actions.

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is an effective method used to alleviate upper abdominal pain or back pain caused by pancreatic cancer and other malignancies. NCPB can relieve cancer pain to improve the quality of life and cause fewer side effects than conventional analgesic drugs. This article systemically reviewed NCPB methodology and research progress in clinical appli-cations.

To study the general characteristics of cancer pain and to improve cancer pain diagnosis and treatment lev-el by prospective and open cross-sectional assessment of the clinical characteristics of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Methods:Patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were observed upon initial admission to the hospital from December 2012 to De-cember 2013. We assessed pain intensity, location, characteristics, and predisposing and mitigating factors and classified the pain by pathophysiology. Results:A total of 310 patients with moderate (101 cases, 32.58%) and severe (209 cases, 67.42%) pains were as-sessed. The top five cancers identified were lung cancer (102 cases, 32.90%), colorectal cancer (30 cases, 9.68%), pancreatic cancer (27 cases, 8.71%), breast cancer (24 cases, 7.74%), and gastric cancer (20 cases, 6.54%). These patients reported 533 cancer pain locations, including waist (132 cases), abdominal (125 cases), chest (88 cases), lower limb (71 cases), shoulder, neck, and upper limb (47 cases), pelvis (33 cases), perineal area (23 cases), and head and face (14 cases). The pain location of the pancreatic cancer was 90.63%consis-tent with the primary tumor site. The pathophysiology of the pain was classified as follows:bone pain (145 cases, 27.20%), visceral pain (138 cases, 25.89%), soft tissue pain (126 cases, 23.64%), and neuropathic pain (124 cases, 23.27%). The incidence of visceral pain in pancreatic cancer was 92.59%. Conclusion:A variety of common malignancies could cause moderate to severe pain, especially lung cancer. The clinical manifestation of pancreatic cancer pain is visceral pain. The location of this cancer was consistent with the pri-mary tumor site. No apparent specificity was observed in other cancer types.

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) arises from physical or chemical damage to peripheral or central neurons or in the neural conduction system.The mechanisms of NCP include pain directly related to tumor involvement,pain associated with chemotherapy,radiotherapy and surgery,neuropathic syndromes associated with paraneoplastic syndromes,inflammation and other factors.A detailed history and careful physical examination are important means of diagnosis of NCP.The clinical evaluation of NCP should use standardized pain assessment scale.Till now,the treatments of NCP include opioid combined with auxiliary analgesic drugs,interventional treatment and gene treatment.Deciding treatment strategies according to the pathogenesis of NCP,multidisciplinary collaboration,combined therapy with different analgesic drugs and technologies are the therapeutic directions for NCP.

Cancer pain can seriously disturb patients′quality of life.Intractable cancer pain not ame-nable to standard analgesics is a horrifying truth in parts of the patients.Interventional pain management tech-niques can be an effective alternative for those patients.Based on the evidence of evidence-based medicine, celiac plexus block or splanchnic nerve block are recommended for the management of upper abdominal cancer pain,pelvic cancer pain can be managed with superior hypogastric plexus block,and back pain due to vertebral compression fractures with tumor invasion can be managed with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Intercostal nerve block for chest wall cancer pain,ganglion impar block and saddle block for perineal pain due to pelvic tumors should be used only in the context of an experimental study or in cases of compassionate use with no other available forms of effective pain relief.

Objective:To compare efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone for bone me-tastasis pain. Methods:A total of 247 bone metastasis patients with pain were analyzed. The radiotherapy group comprised 158 cases, whereas the combination group comprised 89 cases. We mainly observed the effect of pain treatment, behavioral states, and im-proved emotional condition. The side effects and complications were also investigated. Daily medicine consumption of background pain treatment was observed between the two groups. Analysis was done by SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Numerical variables were analyzed using t test and comparisons between groups used chi-square test. Results:The VAS scores of radiotherapy group decreased from 8.12±1.45 to 3.06±1.68 after treatment (P<0.05), and combination group VAS scores from 8.46±1.73 to 2.45±1.47 (P<0.05). The time to pain relief following PVP and radiotherapy were 1.63±0.81 and 8.56±2.87 days, respectively (P<0.001). The breakthrough pain frequency was 4.56 ± 1.98 times/day, which decreased to 1.57 ± 0.98 times/day after PVP (P<0.05). By contrast, the breakthrough pain frequency was 4.73±2.24 times/day before treatment, which decreased to 3.56±1.56 times/day after radiotherapy. No serious compli-cations were observed in the two groups. The depression and anxiety mood in the combination group improved after treatment. Daily medicine consumption in radiotherapy group increased after therapy. However, daily medicine consumption in combination group was reduced after therapy. Conclusion:PVP with radiotherapy can effectively relieve bone metastasis pain and improve patients' quality of life and it is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.

Objective To determine the relationship between dietary fiber intake and risk of prostate cancer.Methods Electronic databases including PubMed,EMBase,Cochrane library,China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI),Wanfang and CBMwere searched to find eligible studies.Random-effects relative risk (RR)and its corresponding 95%CI were used.Besides,random-effects dose-response analyses were also performed to clarify the dose-response relations.Results Ten studies,including five cohort studies and five case-control studies,were eligible and included in this Meta-analysis.The pooled RR of prostate cancer for the highest compared with the lowest dietary fiber intake was 0.87 (95%CI:0.77-0.99,Z =2.10,P =0.035). In addition,pooled estimated data showed that risk of prostate cancer was significantly associated with soluble fiber (RR =0.78,95%CI:0.64-0.95,Z =2.45,P =0.014)and insoluble fiber (RR =0.65,95%CI:0.45-0.88,Z =2.79,P =0.005),but not with fruit,vegetable and cereal fiber intake.However,in dose-response analysis,no significant association was reported (RR =0.996,95%CI:0.989-1.002).Sensitivity analysis showed that the overall results were relatively stable,and omission of any single study had little effect on the combined results.Conclusion Dietary fiber intake is negative related to the risk of prostate cancer. Intake of dietary fiber is recommended to prevent prostate cancer.Considering the limitations of the included studies,more well-designed prospective studies will be needed to confirm our findings.

To explore the status of cancer pain management among hospitalized elderly patients.Pain intensity,use of analgesic drugs and incidence of adverse reactions were surveyed for 620 cancer pain patients.And 218 of them were aged over 65 years.The proportions of mild,moderate and severe pain were 29.8％,36.2％ and 34.0％ respectively.And the corresponding rates in young and middle-aged patients were 28.4％,34.8％ and 36.8％ respectively (P ＞ 0.05).In elders with cancer pain,28％ used no analgesic.For severe pain patients,only 71.6％ received potent opioids and 5.4％ nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.And the corresponding rates in young and middle-aged patients were 26.1％,73.0％ and 4.7％ respectively (P ＞ 0.05).The rates of constipation,dysuria and delirium in elderly patient group were higher than young and middle-aged patient group (P ＜ 0.05).Pain management is unsatisfactory and rational uses of analgesic drugs should be strengthened for preventing the relevant adverse reactions.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of flurbiprofen axetil for treatment of break-through pain (BTP) in patients with metastatic bone cancer pain.Methods Ninety-seven patients with metastatic bone cancer pain complicated with BTP were randomly divided into morphine group (M group,n =51) and flurbiprofen axetil group (F group,n =46).In group M,immediate release morphine sulfate was given orally,and the single dose for pain relief was about 10％ to 15％ of the daily slow-release dose,and the administration was repeated until BTP was relieved.In group F,flurbiprofen axetil 50 mg was infused intravenously over 30 min,and the maximum dose was 150 mg.The BTP frequency was recorded within one month after the first BTP relief.The drug consump-tion for treatment of primary cancer pain,and adverse reaction were recorded.Results The onset time of flurbiprofen axetil and immediate release morphine sulfate was (18± 9) and (35± 11) min,respectively (P ＜ 0.05).The onset time of BTP treatment was significantly shorter,and the incidence of constipation was lower in group F than in group M (P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistical significance in the BTP frequency between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).As compared with that before BTP treatment,the drug consumption for treatment of primary cancer pain was significantly increased after treatment in group M (P ＜ 0.05) and no significant changes were found after treatment in group F (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Flurbiprofen axetil is safer and more effective in relieving BTP in patients with metastatic bone cancer pain than immediate release morphine sulfate,and it does not affect the drug tolerance for treatment of primary pain.

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological features of indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Methods: Five cases of indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and pathological parameters were analyzed by combining clinical data and reviewing the available literature of 35 cases (34 cases abroad and 1 case in China). Results: There were 4 males and 1 female with a median age of 47 years (18-66 years). All patients had abdominal pain and constitutional symptoms including diarrhea, emaciation, intermittent mucous stool or oral and epiglottic ulcers. Endoscopic manifestations included multiple punctate congestion, erosion and ulcer at the terminal ileum and colorectum. Two cases had congestion and erosion of antrum and angle of stomach, and the lesions did not fuse and form tumors. Histologically, the lamina propria was expanded by a dense, medium to small lymphocyte infiltration, which was monomorphic, with slightly irregular nuclei without prominent nucleolus or lymphoepithelial lesions. There were admixed small amount of plasma cells and eosinophils. In 4 cases, immunohistochemistry showed the lesional cells were positive for CD3, CD8, TIA1, and negative for CD4, CD56, granzyme B and Ki-67 index was ≤10%. In situ hybridization showed that EBER was negative and clonal TCR gene rearrangement was detected. One consultation case was CD3⁺, CD5^- and Ki-67 index of 10%, although other indicators were not done. All five patients were treated with symptomatic support. In follow-up observation for 2 to 25 months, all patients were alive with the disease. Conclusions Indolent T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder of the gastrointestinal tract is a newly classified monoclonal T-cell proliferative disease, with low incidence, clinical inertia and long-term survival. It has unique clinicopathological features but pathologically it is easily misdiagnosed as inflammatory bowel disease or T-cell lymphoma. Correct diagnosis is of great important clinical significance.