Objective To understand the current situation of education and management of research integrity in hospitals,medical colleges and medical research institutes.Methods A questionnaire survey and data analysis were conducted among 115 management personnel of scientific research and education management departments in 40 hospitals,medical colleges and medical research institutes.Results 69.57％ of the management personnel showed their institutions were able to offer courses related to academic norms or research integrity,71.30％ of the management personnel showed their institutions have formulated punishment regulations related to violating academic integrity or ethics,and 59.13％ of the management personnel showed their institutions were able to take the initiative to impose punishment measures after identification research misconduct,more than50％ of the management personnel agree it is very necessary to promulgate corresponding rules and regulations,establish research integrity files,implement the one-vote veto system for those who seriously violate research integrity,and carry out research integrity education/academic ethics training/normative education among researchers,more than 70％ of the management personnel believe that system constraints,integrity education,increasing penalties,clear responsibilities,supervision and whistleblowing can reasonably and effectively prevent violations of research integrity.Conclusions The education and management of research integrity in hospitals,medical colleges and medical research institutes need to be improved.We should further strengthen the education,training and dissemination of research integrity,improve the cognitive level and self-discipline awareness of research integrity,formulate and improve relevant management systems,supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms.Then,we should purify academic atmosphere and create a good academic atmosphere.

Objective:To build a comprehensive medical, teaching, and research discipline indicators system that is objective and easily accessible in data, and to develop a comprehensive evaluation method, at the same time provide references for discipline evaluation and orientation.Methods:Literature review was used in referring to the evaluation indicators of different ranking systems in China, Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) were applied to identify the indicators and their weight.Results:A comprehensive discipline evaluation indicator system, including 3 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators, and 41 third-level indicators, were constructed. The Cartesian coordinates allows for specifying the location of the medical, teaching, research level of certain discipline, and the distribution of relevant discipline groups in three-dimensional space.Conclusions:The indicators system for discipline evaluation in this study has the characteristics of refinedness, comprehensiveness, operability, and applicability, providing references for the future evaluation of disciplines.