This study aimed to clarify whether continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) or hemodialysis (HD) was more effective after open heart surgery in dialysis patients. We evaluated 48 consecutive hemodialysis patients (28 men and 20 women, mean age : 68±10 years) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR) between January 2003 and December 2008. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their postoperative dialysis treatment either continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) (CHDF group, n=36) or hemodialysis (HD) (HD group, n=12). Surgery in the CHDF group included 13 concomitant operations, 16 CABGs and 7 AVRs. There was only 1 concomitant surgery in the HD group, and there were 6 CABGs and 5 AVRs. There was no difference between the 2 groups regarding operation time, aortic clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time or intraoperative volume balance. CHDF was started significantly earlier than HD (8.0±5.8 vs. 21.0±1.0 h, p <0.01), which resulted in the removal of a greater volume of body fluid, during the first postoperative 24 h in the CHDF group (1,200±110 vs. 550±50 ml, p <0.01). However, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding the amount of postoperative chest drainage. There were 6 hospital deaths in the CHDF group (17% ; 3 heart failures, and 1 each of pneumonia, arrhythmia and massive intestinal necrosis). There was also 1 hospital death in the HD group (8.3% ; heart failure). Most of the hospital deaths occurred after concomitant operations (6/7, 86%). It is beneficial to start CHDF soon after open heart surgery in hemodialysis patients.

We evaluated 30 patients who required hemodialysis (HD) before open heart surgery between January 1990 and September 2003. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to surgical procedure: 20 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG group: 14 men and 6 women, mean age, 63 years), and 10 patients underwent valve replacement (VR group: 6 men and 4 women, mean age, 56 years). The mean duration of HD in the CABG group was significantly shorter than that in the VR group (67 months: 121 months, p=0.02). The actual survival rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier's method. No patient was lost to follow-up. There were 3 hospital deaths in the CABG group (cerebral infarction, arrhythmia, and mediastinitis), and 2 hospital deaths in the VR group (gangrenous cholecystitis and sepsis). There were also 5 late deaths in the CABG group (acute subdural hematoma, pneumonia, AMI, heart failure and gastric cancer) and 4 deaths in the VR group (uterus cancer, 2 intracerebral hemorrhages and PVE). All cardiac event deaths in the CABG group had undergone CABG only with vein grafts. The 4-year actuarial survival rates were 56% (n=5) in the CABG group with a mean follow-up period of 29 months (max 156 months), and 47% (n=3) in the VR group with a mean follow-up period of 35 months (max 131 months). There are 3 points to improve the prognosis of open heart surgery in hemodialysis patients: control of postoperative infection in both groups, prevention of cardiac events in the CABG group and careful anticoagulation therapy in the VR group.

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is one of the more common congenital anomalies. It is well known that the ascending aorta and aortic root sometimes dilate in patients with BAV, even when the valve function is normal. We examined the morphological type and histological features of the dilated ascending aorta in patients with BAV. Of 276 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (including coronary artery bypass grafting) from 2004 onwards, 60 (21.5%) with BAV were included in this study. The type of BAV was defined according to the Sievers classification. Type 1 BAV was the most common, and enlargement of the ascending aorta (≥45 mm) was the most common in the L/R type of BAV (48%). The morphology of the dilated ascending aortic wall was evaluated using three-dimensional CT angiography. The majority of dilations were asymmetric, but dilation was symmetric in the patient with dilation of the aortic root. Histological examination graded cystic medial necrosis of the ascending aortic walls using the aortic wall score. All patients with BAV had degeneration of the aortic wall, even when there was no dilation. The aortic walls of patients with dilated aortic roots showed advanced degeneration compared with the aortic walls of other patients. Therefore, aggressive root replacement may be appropriate, when the root is mildly dilated in patient with BAV.