Objective Both QBC Star and Sysmex XP-100 hematology analyzers are convenient to carry,which can be used nor-mally under the condition of the field(emergency).This study would compare their test results and operating performance,so to provide guidance for rational use of the instruments.Methods 100 fresh blood samples of 100 health soldiers anti-coagulated by EDTA-K2 were detected by QBC Star and Sysmex XP-100 haematology analyzers respectively,the results of two analyzers were comparatively analyzed and their test time and operating convenience were analyzed.Results There was no significant difference in the results of hemoglobin concentration (HGB),hematocrit (HCT)tested by the two methods (P >0.05).There were significant difference of the mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC),the sum of lymphocyte percent and middle type cells (LYM%+MID%),neutrophil percentage(NEUT%),white blood cell count(WBC),platelet count(PLT)tested by the two meth-ods(P <0.05).The values of MCHC and LYM%+MID% tested by the QBC Star were significantly lower than that detected by Sysmex XP-100(P <0.05),while the rest indicators tested by the former were higher than that of the latter.It took about 5 minutes to complete a blood sample analysis with QBC Star,while about 1 min was needed for Sysmex XP-100.Conclusion The test results of QBC Star and Sysmex XP-100 hematology analyzers couldn′t exchanged except for that of HCT and HGB.Under the condition of field(emergency),QBC Star hematology analyzer is suitable for individual medical examination,and Sysmex XP-100 hematology an-alyzer can be used for the batch medical examination.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptordelta (PPARdelta), as a downstream target of adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) signaling pathway, has been presumed to play some roles in colorectal carcinogenesis. However, the exact role of PPARdelta in colorectal cancer remains unclear. An HIV-1-based lentivirus packaging system was used for the construction of a lentiviral vector (lentivector) mediating RNA interference against PPARB. The direct sequencing demonstrated that the resulting lentivector containing the short-hairpin RNA expression cassette specifically targeting PPARdelta (sh-PPARdelta) was successfully constructed, and designated as pLVshPPARdelta. The control vector was designated as pLVControl. After the transduction, we observed highly efficient transduction (> 90%) of lentivirus in KM12C cells by fluorescent microscopy and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Quantitative RT-PCR showed that pLVshPPARdelta lentivirus reduced PPARdelta mRNA expression by about 70.0% in KM12C cells as compared with that of the untreated cells (P < 0.05), while pLVControl had no significant effect on the PPARdelta mRNA level (P > 0.05). Western blot revealed an obvious reduction of PPARdelta protein expression in pLVshPPARdelta treated cells and showed no obvious difference between the control group and the untreated group. The results demonstrated that the lentivector mediating RNAi against PPARdelta was successfully constructed, which could stably knock down the PPARdelta expression in KM12C cells. This study finally provided a new cell model for the study of PPARdelta's function in colorectal cancer.
Cell Line, Tumor ; Colonic Neoplasms ; genetics ; pathology ; Gene Knockdown Techniques ; Genetic Vectors ; genetics ; Humans ; Lentivirus ; genetics ; metabolism ; PPAR delta ; biosynthesis ; genetics ; RNA Interference ; RNA, Messenger ; biosynthesis ; genetics ; RNA, Small Interfering ; genetics