20ng/ml.The total three-year survival rate is 87%(33/35).Conclusion The effect and prognosis of ?-knife on prostate cancer treatment can be evaluated by the value of PSA before and after the treatment.

mRNA in ARE and GW9662 group were 2.276 ±0.534 and 0.362 ±0.026,respectively.Compared with control group,PPARγmRNA level in both of ARE and GW9662 group reached statistical significance (t =4.785,P =0.001 ;t =2.395,P =0.044).PPARγprotein expression in ARE group,GW9662 +ARE group and control group were 27 688.33 ±3 593.06,21 816.00 ±1 644.07,17 716.33 ±2 273.95,respectively,which was higher in ARE group than that in control and GW+ARE group (t =5.159,P =0.001 ;t =3.038,P =0.016). NF-κB p65 mRNA expression in GW9662 +ARE group was 0.346 ±0.149,which in ARE group and GW9662 group were 0.392 ±0.1 87 and 1 .720 ±0.338,respec-tively.The differences of NF-κB p65 mRNA expression level between ARE,and control or GW9662 group were statistically significant (t =3.592,P =0.007;t =7.851 ,P =0.000).While,the differences of Caspase-3 mRNA and protein expression levels among the four groups were not statistically significant (F =1 .1 81 ,P =0.376;F =0.647,P >0.05).Conclusion ARE may restrain NF-κB through up-regulating PPARγto inhibit the proliferation and invasive potential of LLC in vitro, which suggests that PPAR-γmay be a novel therapeutic target for lung cancer.

Objective To investigate the probability of verifying the X-knife treatment plan by the radiotherapy simulator,and to analyze and report the errors of the X-knife treatment plan for reference.Methods The radiation fields of the X-knife treatment plan were observed in the whole simulating treatment process by the radiotherapy simulator.Results The error rate of X-knife treatment plan were in the simulating treatment process was 5.9%(22/372).Among the errors,3 cases of X-knife plans were found in the simulating treatment process,and the errors of isocenter in Z direction were 10cm.Conclusion This is a special error of X-knife TPS,which deserves more attention in stereotactic radiotherapy.

Objective To investigate the impact of different treatment options on lumbar function, pain intensity, and anterior vertebral height in elderly patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. Methods The clinical data of 102 elderly patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures who completed 1-year follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into conservative group (32 cases), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) group (35 cases), and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) group (35 cases) based on different treatment options. One year after treatment, the clinical efficacy and complications of the three groups were evaluated. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Cobb angle, and anterior vertebral height were compared before and 1 year after treatment among the three groups. Results The excellent and good rates of the PKP group and PVP group were higher than those of the conservative group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rates between the PKP group and PVP group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in occurrence of complications among the three groups (P>0.05). One year after treatment, the VAS scores of the three groups were lower than before treatment, and the JOA scores were higher than before treatment, and the VAS scores of the PKP group and PVP group were lower than those of the conservative group, and the JOA scores were higher than those of the conservative group (P < 0.05). The VAS score of the PKP group was lower than that of the PVP group, and the JOA score was higher than that of the PVP group (P < 0.05). One year after treatment, the Cobb angles of the three groups were smaller than before treatment, and the anterior vertebral heights were higher than before treatment, and the Cobb angles of the PKP group and PVP group were smaller than those of the conservative group, and the anterior vertebral heights were higher than those of the conservative group (P < 0.05). The Cobb angle of the PKP group was smaller than that of the PVP group, and the anterior vertebral height was higher than that of the PVP group, the difference in anterior vertebral height was greater than that of the PVP group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conservative treatment, surgery can improve the clinical efficacy of elderly patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. PKP is superior to PVP in reducing pain of patients, improving lumbar function and Cobb angle, and anterior vertebral height. Moreover, it has better safety.

Objective To evaluate whether the thalamic paraventricular nucleus mediates orexiner-gic ( orexin ) neurons-induced promotion of emergence from general anesthesia by using the optogenetics method in mice. Methods Twenty healthy male Hcrt-cre mice, aged 8-10 weeks, weighing 20-25 g, were divided into 4 groups ( n=5 each) using a random number table method: retrograde labeled viruses channelrhodopsin group ( R group) , anterograde labeled viruses channelrhodopsin group ( A group) , retro-grade labeled viruses control group ( RC group ) , and anterograde labeled viruses control group ( AC group) . The optogenetics technique was used in each group. Anesthesia was induced and maintained through inhaling 1％ isoflurane and pure oxygen 1. 0 L∕min. Electroencephalogram was monitored througout the procedure with the PowerLab monitoring system. The burst suppression ratio ( BSR) was recorded at 1 min before light stimulation and during light stimulation. Results Compared with RC group or the baseline at 1 min before light stimulation, the BSR was significantly decreased during light stimulation in R group ( P<0. 05) . Compared with AC group or the baseline at 1 min before light stimulation, the BSR was signifi-cantly decreased during light stimulation in group A ( P<0. 05) . Conclusion Optogenetics technique ap-plication once again confirms that orexin neurons can promote emergence from general anesthesia through thalamic paraventricular nucleus in mice.

Objective:To evaluate the accuracy and safety of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement under orthopaedic robot navigation system guidance.Methods:From March 2019 to February 2021, the data of 33 patients (19 males and 14 females, aged from 26 to 75 years, with an average age of 50.5 years) treated with pedicle screw fixation with the assistance of orthopaedic surgery robot through the posterior cervical spine were retrospectively analyzed. In clinical diagnosis, there was upper cervical fracture with instability in 14 patients (fracture nonunion in 2 patients), upper & subaxial cervical fracture in 1 patient, cervical spinal cord injury with spinal stenosis in 2 patients, cervical spinal stenosis in 9 patients, occipitocervical deformity in 2 patients, post-operative revision of cervical spondylosis in 2 patients, cervical intraspinal tumor in 3 patients. A total of 151 CPSs were inserted in C 1-C 7 using robot navigation system based on intraoperative three-dimensional C-arm fluoroscopy to assist in screw placement in posterior cervical surgery. Among them, 74 screws were implanted into upper cervical spine; 77 screws were implanted in the lower cervical spine. CT was used to obtain image data within 7 days after operation, and Neo classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. The patients were followed up for 2 weeks to observe the clinical symptoms and signs, and to determine whether there were surgical complications such as nerve and blood vessel injury and incision infection. Results:According to Neo classification, 91.4% (138/151) screws were completely contained in the pedicle without breaking through the pedicle cortex (grade 0). Among them, the accuracy of C 1 screws was 97.1% (34/35), C 2 screws was 92.3% (36/39), C 3 screws was 88.2% (15/17), C 4 screws was 71.4% (10/14), C 5 screws was 85.7% (12/14), C 6 screws was 93.3% (14/15), C 7 screws was 100.0% (17/17). The screw accuracy was highest in C 7, the lowest in C 4. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed on the accuracy of screw placement in different cervical level, and the results showed that there was no statistical difference (χ 2=1.31, P=0.971). However, a total of 13 screws were found to perforate the cortex of pedicle, although any neural or vascular complications associated with CPS placement were not encountered. Among them, 9 screws were found to perforate laterally, and 4 screws were found to perforate medially. No postoperative incision infection occurred in all cases. Conclusion:The safety of CPS placement can be effectively guaranteed with the assistance of the orthopaedic robot system.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted and fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods:A total of 27 patients with lumbar degenerative disease receiving robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (robot-assisted group) treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from May 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 9 males and 18 females, aged 61.00±9.11 years (range, 41-71 years). Twenty-seven patients who received fluoroscopic-assisted MIS-TLIF (fluoroscopic-assisted group) during the same period were selected as controls, including 16 males and 11 females, aged 56.70±11.97 years (range, 32-76 years). Operation time, intraoperative bleeding, radiation exposure time, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and postoperative complications were recorded. The learning curve of the robot-assisted group was drawn based on the amount of surgery and the operation time by fitting the logarithmic curve.Results:All patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 15.44±3.89 months (range, 12-24 months). The operation time, drainage volume, and hospitalization time in the robot-assisted group were 181.44±36.43 min, 43.70±22.04 ml, and 5.04±1.40 d, respectively, which were smaller than 223.22±59.40 min, 74.63±71.86 ml, 6.59±3.04 d in the fluoroscopy-assisted group, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The radiation exposure time in robot-assisted group was 77.78±9.81 s, which was larger than fluoroscopy-assisted group (63.78±17.70 s). There were statistically significant differences in lumbar VAS scores between the two groups before and after surgery ( P<0.05), 3 days after operation and the last follow-up was smaller than those before operation. The VAS score on postoperative day 3 in the robot-assisted group was 2.52±0.98, which was less than 3.07±0.87 in the fluoroscopically-assisted group ( t=0.294, P=0.032). In both groups, 108 pedicle screws were placed, and the accuracy of nail placement in the robot-assisted group was 93.5% (101/108), which was greater than that in the fluoroscopically-assisted group 77.8% (84/108), and the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=11.821, P=0.008). By fitting a logarithmic curve to describe the relationship between the number of operations and the operation time of the robotic-assisted group of operators, the results showed that the operation time decreased with the increase of the number of operations, and the operation time fluctuated greatly in the first 10 cases, and then gradually shortened and stabilized after 10 operations. Conclusion:Robot-assisted MIS-TLIF can improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, improve the early postoperative pain and shorten the learning curve.

Objective:To evaluate the impact of orthopedic robotic assistance and conventional freehand methods on surgical strategies, the safety of pedicle screw placement, and clinical efficacy in patients with upper cervical spine diseases.Methods:From January 2017 to March 2023, a total of 63 cases with upper cervical spine disease, were divided into two groups based on the screw placement technique: the robot-assisted pedicle screw placement (RA) group (41 cases) and the conventional freehand pedicle screw placement (CF) group (22 cases), were retrospectively included. These patients in the RA and CF groups underwent two types of posterior cervical surgery, including occipitocervical fusion (9 cases and 8 cases) and fixation and fusion of atlantoaxial and distal vertebrae (32 cases and 14 cases). The outcome parameters, including the disease course, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy frequency, radiation dose, hospital stay, treatment costs, complications, the rate of the pedicle screw placement, accuracy of upper cervical pedicle screw placement, and the risk factors that possibly affected the accuracy were recorded and analyzed. Postoperative follow-up was conducted for at least 6 months, and the efficacy of patients was assessed using imaging parameters, ASIS classification, VAS, and JOA scores.Results:Both groups had no screw-related complications and no spinal cord or vertebral artery injuries. In the RA group, the pedicle screw placement rates for the patients with occipitocervical fusion, and fixation and fusion of atlantoaxial and distal vertebrae were 100% (48/48) and 89.6% (138/154), respectively, far exceeding the placement rate in the CF group 42.9% (18/42) and 78.3% (54/69) (χ 2=37.403, P<0.001; χ 2=5.128, P=0.024). The fluoroscopic exposure dose and operation time of the two types of surgical patients in the RA group were both higher than those in the CF group ( P<0.05). Compared with the CF group, the accuracy of C 1 screws in the RA group increased from 42% (11/26) to 80% (51/64), with statistical significance (χ 2=13.342, P=0.004); while the accuracy of C 2 screws improved from 77% (33/43) to 88% (63/72) with no statistical difference (χ 2=2.863, P=0.413). Non-parametric correlation analysis found a significant correlation between the accuracy of C 1 and C 2 pedicle screw placement and the order of guide wire insertion in the RA group ( r=0.580, P<0.001; r=0.369, P=0.001). Postoperatively, both groups showed significant differences in cervicomedullary angle (CMA), Chamberlain angle (CL), McGregor angle, Boogard angle, Bull angle, clivus-canal angle (CCA), occipitocervical (C 0-C 2) angle, posterior occipitocervical angle (POCA), C 2-C 7 angle, and anterior atlantodental interval (ADI) ( P<0.05). The ASIA classification improved to varying degrees for both groups postoperatively, but there were no statistically significant differences between preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up evaluations. VAS and JOA scores significantly improved for both groups postoperatively and at the last follow-up ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Both orthopedic robotic-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement techniques achieved satisfactory therapeutic effects in the treatment of upper cervical spine diseases. The orthopedic robot can effectively ensure the accuracy of upper cervical pedicle screw placement, the increase placement rate of pedicle screws in the upper cervical spine, and reduce fluoroscopy exposure. However, it is necessary to avoid the vertebral displacement caused by the priority insertion of the guide needle, which may affect the accuracy of subsequent planning.

Osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture in the elderly will seriously reduce their quality of life and life expectancy. For osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture in the elderly, spinal reconstruction is necessary, which should comprehensively consider factors such as the physical condition, fracture type, clinical characteristics and osteoporosis degree. While there lacks relevant clinical norms or guidelines on selection of spinal reconstruction strategies. In order to standardize the concept of spinal reconstruction for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture in the elderly, based on the principles of scientificity, practicality and progressiveness, the authors formulated the Clinical guideline for spinal reconstruction of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture in elderly patients ( version 2022), in which suggestions based on evidence of evidence-based medicine were put forward upon 10 important issues related to the fracture classification, non-operative treatment strategies and surgical treatment strategies in spinal reconstruction after osteoporosis thoracolumbar fracture in the elderly, hoping to provide a reference for clinical treatment.

The incidence of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture (OTLVF) in the elderly is gradually increasing. The kyphotic deformity caused by various factors has become an important characteristic of OTLVF and has received increasing attention. Its clinical manifestations include pain, delayed nerve damage, sagittal imbalance, etc. Currently, the definition and diagnosis of OTLVF with kyphotic deformity in the elderly are still unclear. Although there are many treatment options, they are controversial. Existing guidelines or consensuses pay little attention to this type of fracture with kyphotic deformity. To this end, the Lumbar Education Working Group of the Spine Branch of the Chinese Medicine Education Association and Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Trauma organized the experts in the relevant fields to jointly develop Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures with kyphotic deformity in the elderly ( version 2024), based on evidence-based medical advancements and the principles of scientificity, practicality, and advanced nature, which provided 18 recommendations to standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment.