Objective To analyse the pathogenesis,diagnosis and therapy for severe lung contusion.Methods 38 cases of severe lung contusion were observed.On the basis of lung contusion,the patients suffered from mltiple organs trauma,or abdomino-thoracic combinative trauma all of the patients were comprehansive treated with assited ventilation,antishock,high dasage hormone in short-time,dehydrating agent and diuretics therapy etc.Simultaneously,all of concurrent trauma were also reasonably managed timely which including closed thoracic drainage,open chest hemostasis,scavenging hematoma with craniotomy laparosplenotomy,hepatospleno-repair,gastroenterostomy,lower or upper extremity open reduction and extration etc.Results By oxygen inhalation comprehensive treatment did not improve the dyspnea symptom of severe lung contusion when the blood oxygen saturation was lower than 85% and further fall,the severe lung contusion patients were obviously improved by assited ventilation with respirator.Conclusions Using assited ventilation could raise the cure rate for the severe lung contusion,and simultaneously,early diagnosis and comprehansive treatment in time have identical importance.

Objective:To analyze the modifiable risk factors for early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD), and provide evidence for primary prevention of EOAD.Methods:Forty patients with EOAD, admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to April 2020, were selected as EOAD group, and 120 healthy controls accepted physical examination and matched with EOAD patients in age, gender and education level were selected. Demographic characteristics and clinical data of patients from the EOAD group and subjects from the control group were compared retrospectively, and multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent risk factors for onset of EOAD.Results:As compared with the control group, the EOAD group had significantly higher proportion of patients with hypertension, non-traumatic tooth loosening or loss, history of traumatic brain injury, hearing impairment, chronic stress and/or anxiety, and sleep disorder ( P<0.05). The results of multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension ( OR=4.559, 95%CI=1.523-13.643, P=0.007), non-traumatic loss or loosing of tooth ( OR=5.345, 95%CI=1.989-14.346, P=0.001), hearing impairment ( OR=9.336, 95%CI=2.033-27.850, P=0.000), chronic stress and/or anxiety ( OR=7.375, 95%CI=2.612-20.822, P=0.000), and sleep disorder ( OR=4.875, 95%CI=1.520-15.625, P=0.002) were independent risk factors for onset of EOAD. Conclusion:Hypertension, non-traumatic loss or loosing of tooth, hearing impairment, chronic stress and/or anxiety, and sleep disorders are risk factors for onset of EOAD; the screening and intervention of these risk factors can be used as a primary prevention strategy for EOAD.

To compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab biweekly regimen with those of standard weekly regimen as a first-line therapy of KRAS/RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients who received weekly or biweekly administra-tion of cetuximab plus FOLFOX/XELOX as a first-line therapy from July 2010 to December 2017 in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and frequencies of adverse events (AEs) between the two groups were compared. Results: Of 152 eligible patients, 55 were in the biweekly group and 43 were in the weekly group. The biweekly group had significantly higher ORR than the weekly group (76.3% vs. 54.8%, P=0.025). Median PFS in the biweekly and weekly groups were 10.3 and 8.8 months, respectively (P=0.288), and the median OS were 33.5 and 27.4 months, respectively (P=0.563). The two groups showed no significant difference in PFS and OS. For overall AEs, the biweekly group presented significantly more stomatitis (32.7% vs. 14.0% , P=0.032) and tended to show substantially more acne-like rash (80.0% vs. 62.8%, P=0.058) and leukopenia and/or neutropenia (72.7% vs. 55.8%, P=0.081). The frequency of 3/4 grade acne-like rash in the biweekly and weekly groups were 18.2% and 7.0%, respectively (P=0.105). The frequency of all grade 3/4 AEs between the two groups showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusions: Biweekly regimen of cetuximab plus FOLFOX/XE-LOX had similar efficacy and higher ORR compared with those of standard weekly regimen. Cetuximab administered biweekly may be an optional choice in clinical practice, with close attention paid to increased frequency of certain AEs.

Objective:Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with dual effects of anti-proliferation and anti-angiogenesis. Phase Ⅰ clinical trials showed anlotinib was well tolerated and had therapeutic effects on a variety of tumors. The aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Methods:Between January 2014 and November 2015, a single-center data was obtained from a phase Ⅱ clinical study of anlotinib versus sunitinib on advanced renal cell carcinoma and a phase Ⅱ clinical study of anlotinib on advanced renal cell carcinoma which failed to respond to TKI treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, while Log-rank test was used to compare the survival rates.Results:A total of 36 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study, including 19 patients without any target drug treatment, 12 patients with sunitinib treatment and 5 patients with sorafenib treatment. The median number of treatment cycle was 16. Partial response (PR) was obtained in 11 patients (30.6%) and stable disease (SD) was obtained in 24 patients (66.7%). The disease control rate (DCR) was 97.2%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.6 months, the 1-year survival rate was 80.6%, and the median survival time was 22.2 months. Up to the follow-up deadline, 3 patients still received treatment, the PFSs were 52.6 months, 65.0 months, and 66.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included hypertension (19.4%), hand-foot skin reaction (11.1%), proteinuria (5.6%) and anemia (5.6%).Conclusions:Anlotinib shows good anti-tumor activity and is generally well-tolerated in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. The adverse reactions of anlotinib are milder than sunitinib or pazopanib.

Objective Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor?tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR?TKIs) are widely used for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment?related hypertension and the therapeutic efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs. Methods Clinical data of 155 mRCC patients treated with VEGFR?TKIs at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received first?line TKI therapy. Among them, 69 patients were treated with sunitinib, 14 cases with pazopanib, and 51 cases with fazotinib. Kaplan?Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival of the patients. Results The median survival for the whole group ( n=155) was 36. 2 months. Among the 98 (63.2%) patients who developed hypertension, 9 patients (5.8%) were evaluated as gradeⅠ, 54 (34.8%) as grade Ⅱ and 35 (22.6%) as gradeⅢ, and there was no patient with gradeⅣhypertension. The occurrence of TKI?related hypertension was correlated with age and MSKCC score (P<0.05), while not significantly correlated with gender, nephrectomy, T stage, number of metastases, lung metastasis or sunitinib treatment (P>0.05 for all). For the whole group (n=155), the therapeutic efficacy rate was 43.2% (67/155), the median progression?free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 36.2 months. The response rate (RR) was 26.3% (15/57) in patients with normal blood pressure and 53.1%(52/98) in patients with hypertension (P=0.001). The median PFS was 7.1 months in the cases with normal blood pressure and 13.8 months in patients with hypertension (P=0.032). The response rates were 33.3% (3/9), 51.9% (28/54) and 60.0% (21/35) in patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension (P=0.006). The median PFS was 7.1, 9.7, and 12.0 and 19.5 months in patients with normal blood pressure, and patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension, respectively (P=0.039). Both univariant and multivariant analyses indicated that treatment?related hypertension is an important predictive factor for the efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs therapy. Conclusions Hypertension might be an effective predictive factor for efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs therapy in mRCC patients. Large?sample studies are warranted to further prove these results.

Objective:Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with dual effects of anti-proliferation and anti-angiogenesis. Phase Ⅰ clinical trials showed anlotinib was well tolerated and had therapeutic effects on a variety of tumors. The aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Methods:Between January 2014 and November 2015, a single-center data was obtained from a phase Ⅱ clinical study of anlotinib versus sunitinib on advanced renal cell carcinoma and a phase Ⅱ clinical study of anlotinib on advanced renal cell carcinoma which failed to respond to TKI treatment. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, while Log-rank test was used to compare the survival rates.Results:A total of 36 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled in this study, including 19 patients without any target drug treatment, 12 patients with sunitinib treatment and 5 patients with sorafenib treatment. The median number of treatment cycle was 16. Partial response (PR) was obtained in 11 patients (30.6%) and stable disease (SD) was obtained in 24 patients (66.7%). The disease control rate (DCR) was 97.2%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 12.6 months, the 1-year survival rate was 80.6%, and the median survival time was 22.2 months. Up to the follow-up deadline, 3 patients still received treatment, the PFSs were 52.6 months, 65.0 months, and 66.7 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included hypertension (19.4%), hand-foot skin reaction (11.1%), proteinuria (5.6%) and anemia (5.6%).Conclusions:Anlotinib shows good anti-tumor activity and is generally well-tolerated in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. The adverse reactions of anlotinib are milder than sunitinib or pazopanib.

Objective Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor?tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR?TKIs) are widely used for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between treatment?related hypertension and the therapeutic efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs. Methods Clinical data of 155 mRCC patients treated with VEGFR?TKIs at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from 2006 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received first?line TKI therapy. Among them, 69 patients were treated with sunitinib, 14 cases with pazopanib, and 51 cases with fazotinib. Kaplan?Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival of the patients. Results The median survival for the whole group ( n=155) was 36. 2 months. Among the 98 (63.2%) patients who developed hypertension, 9 patients (5.8%) were evaluated as gradeⅠ, 54 (34.8%) as grade Ⅱ and 35 (22.6%) as gradeⅢ, and there was no patient with gradeⅣhypertension. The occurrence of TKI?related hypertension was correlated with age and MSKCC score (P<0.05), while not significantly correlated with gender, nephrectomy, T stage, number of metastases, lung metastasis or sunitinib treatment (P>0.05 for all). For the whole group (n=155), the therapeutic efficacy rate was 43.2% (67/155), the median progression?free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 36.2 months. The response rate (RR) was 26.3% (15/57) in patients with normal blood pressure and 53.1%(52/98) in patients with hypertension (P=0.001). The median PFS was 7.1 months in the cases with normal blood pressure and 13.8 months in patients with hypertension (P=0.032). The response rates were 33.3% (3/9), 51.9% (28/54) and 60.0% (21/35) in patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension (P=0.006). The median PFS was 7.1, 9.7, and 12.0 and 19.5 months in patients with normal blood pressure, and patients with grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ hypertension, respectively (P=0.039). Both univariant and multivariant analyses indicated that treatment?related hypertension is an important predictive factor for the efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs therapy. Conclusions Hypertension might be an effective predictive factor for efficacy of VEGFR?TKIs therapy in mRCC patients. Large?sample studies are warranted to further prove these results.

Cardiomyopathy, Dilated/metabolism* ; Humans ; Microfilament Proteins/metabolism* ; Models, Cardiovascular ; Mutation ; Myocytes, Cardiac ; Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism* ; Transcription Factors/metabolism* ; Troponin T/metabolism*