Objective To study the set-up errors by CBCT in IMRT with two different immobilization techniques for thoracic and abdominal tumors.Methods Sixty patients with thoracic and abdominal tumor were included in this study and separated into study group and the control group.The study group were immobilized with carbon fiber holder,vacuum bag and thermoplastic mask.The control group were immobilized with carbon fiber holder and thermoplastic mask.CBCT scan and auto-match online were regularly performed before the treatment.The setup of left-right(x),superior-inferior(y),anterior-posterior (z) were received.The value of the Mptv was calculated,meanwhile.The grouped t-test of was carried out between these two methods.Results The shift errors in x-,y-,z-dimension of the study group were (0.32 ± 2.58) mm,(-0.40 ± 3.89) mm,(-0.75 ± 2.43) mm.The Mrrv were 5.60 mm,6.08 mm,6.32 mm.The translation set-up errors in x-,y-,z-dimension of the control group were(0.62 ±3.60),(2.44 ± 4.93),(0.66 ±2.85) mm,respectively.The MPrv were 8.07,10.63,6.90 mm,respectively.The t-test value were t =-0.78,-5.11,-4.22,P =0.440,0.000,0.000,respectively.Conclusions The immobilization techniques with carbon fiber holder,vacuum bag and thermoplastic mask would be better than the techniques without the vacuum bag in reducing the setup errors.

Objective To analyze setup errors for irradiation of pelvic carcinoma by online conebeam CT (CBCT) scanning and to calculate the external margins from clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) in treatment planning. Methods Twelve patients with rectal or prostate cancer were enrolled in this study. Translational errors (x,y,z) and rotational errors (u,v,w) were obtained by using CBCT in radiotherapy. Results The set-up errors were gathered from 229 sets of CBCT in 12patients. The systemic ± random errors on x,y,z, u,v and w axes were (0.49 ± 1.18) mm, (-0. 11 ±3.45) mm, (-2. 00 ± 1.59) mm, 1.14°±0. 67°, 0. 42°±O. 94°and -0. 32°±±0. 68°, respectively. Setup errors in the left-right, anterior-posterior, and superior-inferior directions were 4. 6 mm, 12. 5 mm, and 6. 2 mm, respectively. Conclusions Set-up errors were unavoidable in pelvic carcinoma irradiation. To minimize the influence of set-up errors, we suggest a PTV margin of 5 mm, 15 mm and 10 mm in the leftright, anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively.

Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of fixed field intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT),volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients.Methods Eighteen NPC patients previously treated with VMAT were retrospectively included and re-planned using HT and IMRT (7 fields) techniques utilizing the same dose prescription and optimization objectives.The following parameters were compared across the three types of plans:homogeneity index (HI),conformity index (CI),maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) of targets ; the Dmax and Dmean of organs at risk (OARs) ; the doses and volumes of volume of interest; the treatment delivery time and monitor units (MU).Results Clinically acceptable target coverage could be achieved by IMRT,VMAT and HT plans.The HT plans were the best yet IMRT plans were the worst in HI and CI of targets.IMRT imposed highest doses to OARs while HT deposited least doses to the spinal cord,brainstem and parotid.However,the VMAT plans displayed the lowest doses on optic nerves,chiasma and lens while highest doses were found in IMRT plans.The average delivery time per fraction of IMRT (8.0±0.5) min were more than that of HT (7.4 ±0.9) min and VMAT (3.9 ±0.1) min plans.The MUs of IMRT plans (711.4 ±78.7) were larger than that of VMAT plans (596.4 ±33.7).Conclusions Three types of plans can all achieve the clinical dosimetric demands,but HT has the best performance on CI and HI.VMAT is most efficient regarding the delivery time and total MUs.

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) of Elekta can be used to analyze the setup errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy. A total of 240 patients with head and neck cancer were chosen in the period from October, 2009 to October, 2010. Their CBCT images were obtained after initial setup, and registered to the planning CT images, and then the setup errors on translational directions (X, Y, Z) and on rotational directions (U, V, W) were obtained and analyzed. The results showed that the setup errors on translational directions in Y-axis and Z-axis were larger than in X-axis, and the setup errors on rotational directions in Y-axis was much more obvious than those on the other two directions, which should be taken care during the patient daily setup. It may be concluded that the CBCT system can improve the precision for radiotherapy.
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; methods ; Head and Neck Neoplasms ; diagnostic imaging ; radiotherapy ; Humans ; Radiotherapy Setup Errors ; prevention & control ; statistics & numerical data ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated